Recommend a game for FIFA or Pro Evolution Soccer!

Updated on Game 2024-04-12
19 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    1. FIFA2006WC or Live 8 can be selected in two versions: medium-rough) beautiful).

    2. FIFA's goals are simple, the speed is particularly smooth, and it is very refreshing. Live 8 is lower than BT, but slightly more realistic than FIFA.

    3. FIFA In order to take care of PC players, textures are more suitable for low configuration. Live 8 can be adjusted a lot.

    4. Live Chinese commentary, Chinese players have names. FIFA's commentary is all in English, but the names are all in place.

    This is a more mature version of the live. Compared with the speed and long-range shooting of the live 8bt, PES6 is more stable, and it is not as good as PES2008 R2 (when protecting the ball, it is almost impossible to break off the good technique).

    The original left and right. There is an up-to-date archive.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The fully live Chinese PES6, called China Storm, joined the team of the Chinese Super League (although few people use it). This version is the most comfortable version I have ever played, with two-person Chinese commentary (a small number of Chinese players can't read their names). According to your requirements, it should be fine (adjust the image quality to medium or low).

    As for keyboard operation, it is not a problem, because many people use keyboards. The system is also good, you can create new players, adjust their stats, age, growth trends, appearances, etc.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    I personally think Live 8 is fun, as for the Chinese commentary, you can go to search for the Chinese commentary of Live 8, Wang Tao's, more.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    That's the one that WCN got completely live, haha, not bad.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Depending on the stage, Pro Evolution Soccer has a slight upper hand.

    The first stage: from the 90s to around the new millennium - during this period, "FIFA" was stronger than "Pro Evolution Soccer" in terms of the game's environmental effects and atmosphere rendering, at that time, "Pro Evolution Soccer" was limited by the hardware of the game console, and the picture was relatively rough, while the computer only had good graphics card hardware acceleration, and the picture was a grade higher; But from the operational point of view, Pro Evolution Soccer beats FIFA completely, and the details of the players' movements and some small actions in the game are more realistic.

    Phase 2: 2002 2013, arguably the most controversial period between FIFA and Pro Evolution Soccer, some people like the real and comfortable feel of Pro Evolution Soccer Sakura, while others like FIFA's more realistic graphics and more player authorization data, and there is also the online mode after that.

    In particular, during this period, "Pro Evolution Soccer 8" and the subsequent "PES2013" were well received by many players, and "Real Evolution Soccer 8" is a must-install game in most Internet cafes, with a good reputation and a wide audience, "FIFA" seems to be slightly less popular during this period, but it has not lost resistance.

    The third stage: 2014 stupid debate So far, perhaps "FIFA" has been suppressed by the popularity of "Pro Evolution Soccer" before, "FIFA15" with the beginning of the next generation of football games, but also updated the picture engine, from this generation "FIFA" in addition to maintaining a certain level in the picture, in the details of player action, weather and other aspects have also begun to invest more energy in development and production, coupled with the advantages of previous generations of online mode and copyright, now has slowly occupied most of the market for football games.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    If you ask FIFA98 FIFA2007 to compete with WE3 WE10 and PES3 PES6 PES2007 series, then I will not hesitate to tell you: KONAMI beats EA!

    But! From what I've learned recently - PES2008 is the worst-rated "PES" or "We" in the series; FIFA 2008 is the highest-rated "FIFA" in the series. Note:

    I said that it is from the information I have, but I did not say that it is an objective fact!

    Of course, whether the highest-rated FIFA is more fun than the worst-rated "live" can vary from person to person. Therefore, it is recommended that the landlord experience both works if possible, after all, we think it is good, you may not like it, and vice versa!

    But I have a feeling that PES2009 is going to be exceptional! Because as long as Konami is scolded, he will work hard! Let's look forward to the next work.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    One is made by Konami and the other is made by EA;

    One is made by the Japanese, and the other is made by the Europeans and Americans;

    Live has the copyright of the Champions League and AFC Champions League, while FIFA does not;

    The live broadcast is mainly aimed at players from some countries in Asia, and FIFA is aimed at players from all over the world.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Pro Evolution Soccer is no different from FIFA in that it's all about kicking ball.

    It's just that the live was developed by the Japanese company Konami and FIFA was developed by the American company Electronic Arts.

    Personally, I think FIFA is more fun.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    There are still fewer bugs in Pro Evolution Football compared to FIFA.,Especially in recent years.,But to be honest, it's a different game developed by two companies.,Carrot greens have their own loves.,There's no way to say which one is good and which is bad.,At the beginning, I also played FIFA.,03 years,But then I came into contact with Live 8 and went directly to the live without hesitation.,In terms of authenticity,The live situation at that time was still much better than FIFA.。 Now I can't judge if I don't play FIFA, but I often see FIFA's bug highlights, and I think it's funny if I break my arm and leg at every turn.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    In any case, each has its own characteristics, and all of them are very popular. I played the live first.,Later, I also played FIFA.,I feel that the live is more ball-like.,I always feel like FIFA is fluttering.,Maybe I'm preconceived.,The above is just my personal opinion for reference only.,Don't spray if you don't like it.。 You can feel it all.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Pro Evolution Soccer moves are all combos, and you have to press several keys at the same time, while FIFA Soccer can be set by itself. For example, in Pro Evolution Soccer, press Q and X at the same time and then press W at the same time, while FIFA Soccer can press space. So, Pro Evolution Soccer is harder than FIFA Soccer.

    And true.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Both are well-known soccer games, specifically, FIFA is more realistic and the live is more entertaining, but the gap between the two generations is narrowing.

    In addition, FIFA has the official authorization of national football associations, but there is no live situation, only the five major leagues (except the Bundesliga) leagues, FIFA basically has leagues all over the world, including the K League, etc.

    The feel of the two is also different, and the live rate is slower.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    As a live player for 16 years, and a FIFA player for 5 years, let me tell you.

    For now, there is almost no big difference between the two games, FIFA has international competitions, and online on PC is more accessible to the people, while live performance is better in PS4 consoles, and the optimization on PC is more average.

    In terms of operation, it's really nothing bad, the buttons can be customized, and the production teams of both parties are in and out, in fact, they can be regarded as two games made by a wave of people.

    Historically, live football is closer to real football, while FIFA is more game-oriented and fancy.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Live is very different from FIFA, live operations are more complex and close to reality, and FIFA is more entertaining. But FIFA is now gradually getting closer to reality, and EA's human and material resources are incomparable to Konami's. In addition, many clubs and countries are unauthorized, and the effect is not as good as FIFA, which is still a WCG competition, and the live situation cannot be ranked.

    Anyway, it's up to you to choose which is better or worse.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Japan develops Pro Evolution Soccer and the United States develops FIFA Soccer.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Pro Evolution Soccer is real. It's hard to play some FIFA soccer leave.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    I don't think FIFA is any better than live.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Live can speed up by itself, FIFA can't!

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Live is more about realism, and FIFA is more about gameplay.

Related questions
23 answers2024-04-12

Let's buy a set of mud mills.

Recently, it has become more popular and has no chemical components. >>>More

18 answers2024-04-12

World of Warcraft! The best game of the year.

Or go karting. >>>More

14 answers2024-04-12

In fact, high sound quality is contradictory to **, the so-called price of a penny. There are not many pure tones on the market now, iAudio E2, Philips S28, Samsung U5, Sony's E042, you can take a look first. >>>More

10 answers2024-04-12

What about the A780?

But personally, I think Nokia is better. >>>More

4 answers2024-04-12

1.Huawei Mate 40 Pro+:

Advantages: leading camera technology, super performance, 90Hz refresh rate screen, 5G network, support 55W super fast charging. >>>More