What is the philosophical view that everything in the world is nothing but a composite of sensations

Philosophy is the essence of things, you don't care what your point of view is, the essence of a thing and a thing will not change. As soon as you recognize the essence of things, your mind will change with it!

The revival of all things is just a law of nature! Only when there is a law can all things be suitable for survival.

Empirical criticism is also called Machism.

An idealist view is certainly admitted.

It's obviously empiricism!

I seem to have seen it in **, and there is another one that says that everything in the world is a combination of atoms, and human sensation is also the effect of hormones.

Could it be naïve idealism that you're talking about?

Let's not simply categorize, but think deeply and carefully. All things are the compound of sensations, the composite of ideas, which is the basis of all philosophy. Both materialistic and idealistic.

As long as we calm down and think carefully, we will understand that this is a scientific statement. Materialism and idealism are two ideological systems derived from this basis. These two ideologies are luxuries in our lives.

From the perspective of enlightenment, it is very important to understand that all things are a composite of sensations and concepts, which is a golden key to enlightenment. For example, Buddhism has the concept of ten thousand laws and only knowledge; For example, Lao Tzu's world is a knowledge, and knowledge is the flower of the Tao; For example, Gongsun Long's judgment of detachment from Jianbai; Wait a minute. This is all to tell us that everything, in a demonstrable sense, is the mind and the mind.

Nothing else. In fact, any practice is to cultivate the mind, to bring all things into one's own mind, and to get rid of all ideological systems and all conceptual entanglements. This is the so-called oneness of all laws.

This, in the end, is not a thing, nor a mind, but a way.

From a philosophical point of view, everything in the world boils down to two categories of phenomena: () aThe phenomenon of giving and taking.

b.Material phenomena and spiritual phenomena.

c.The phenomenon of rights and obligations.

d.Paid phenomena and gratuitous trembling and delaying phenomena.

Correct answer: B

Materialism can be divided into naïve materialism (the philosophical doctrine of using one or several specific material forms to explain the origin of the world, such as the ancient Greek philosopher Thales believed that water is the source of all things), mechanical materialism (that everything in the world can be explained by mechanical principles, and looks at the whole world from an isolated and static point of view, such as the famous phrase "man is a machine" by the French materialist Ramette in the 18th century), and finally dialectical materialism, which believes that the material world is always in motion and change. They are mutually influencing and interrelated.

Idealism can be divided into subjective idealism and objective idealism, subjective idealism regards a certain subjective spirit of an individual such as feelings, experiences, minds, consciousness, concepts, will, etc. as the root and basis of the generation and existence of all things in the world, and everything in the world is derived from these subjective spirits, and is the manifestation of these subjective spirits, such as Berkeley's famous saying "existence is perception". Objective idealism holds that an objective spirit or principle is an ontology that precedes and exists independently of the material world, and that the material world (or phenomenal world) is nothing more than the externalization or manifestation of this objective spirit or principle, such as Hegel's "absolute spirit."

It also answers the second question, whether the mind can recognize existence, which can be divided into agnosticism and agnosticism. Agnostics believe that the world itself cannot be known except for sensations or phenomena, such as Kant, who believes that we can only know the phenomenal world, and that we cannot know the object itself (the thing in itself). Agnostics believe that the world can be known by people, that there are only things in the world that have not yet been known, and that there are no things that cannot be known.

This is a logical explanation. Someone asked, I was beaten and robbed while walking on the road, is this reasonable?

But if we understand it this way, we can understand that the robber and the victim are present at a certain place, at a certain time, and so on, which are all the conditions for the victim to be robbed and the robber to commit the crime, and when these conditions are met, the "robbery" occurs, and conversely, if the above conditions are lacking, it is impossible for the robbery to occur. Therefore, if a robbery happens, there must be a reasonable explanation for its occurrence.

Here, reasonableness is the cause and effect of the formation of things, not a judgment of right and wrong, good and evil.

Therefore, everything that exists is reasonable and correct. As for "can this philosophical thought really know the whole of everything"? Here's how it's understood:

Because "everything that exists is reasonable", we know the truth of all kinds of things according to this "existence". For example, if someone is robbed, the police will judge, recognize, and finally solve the case based on the existence of various things at the scene. The same is true for other things, people can always deduce from the things that actually exist, and know some things that cannot be known for the time being, and the deeper the study, the deeper the understanding, then according to this "logical deduction", people can finally understand the whole of all things.

But logical inferences are logical inferences, and reality is reality. We know that we know a thing, especially the material aspect, such as "water", which is a matter made of H2O, but what are the components of H and O? Although our science is constantly advancing, we can never know what the "infinite dichotomy" matter is made of, so from a practical point of view, we cannot know the truth of all things.

In short, inference is inference, reality is reality, philosophy guides science, and science verifies philosophy, both of which are indispensable. As for human beings, we can only study hard and practice, and it is not important whether we can know the whole thing at the end of our lives, but what is important is that we have no regrets in this life.

This can only be used as an explanation of the cognitive aspect of things, which can be compared to the "life" that the people of our country often say, this explanation can open up a way for you to know things, but it can also become an obstacle for you to recognize things, and realize that existence is reasonable, and it is far from knowing the samadhi of all things.

There is no one-size-fits-all thing. Philosophy is never for the sake of opportunism.

Reasonableness corresponds, and this problem is a chicken-and-egg problem. Hehe.

The saying of "Lixue Broken Arm" is not mentioned in Tang Zun Xuanfei's continued biography of the high monk in Volume 16 "Dharma Turn", although the same book "Hui Ke Biography" mentions the "broken arm", but it is because Zhou Wu destroyed the Buddha, Hui Ke and Tan Lin were cut by the helmet when they supported the scripture image. Therefore, Hui Ke's theory of "standing up and breaking his arm" to seek the Dharma may have been made up by later Zen practitioners, and it is not necessarily the truth.

Philosophy is a systematic, conceptual worldview. Everyone has a worldview, but only the ideological system that is systematized and theorized to form a worldview is philosophy.