Help analyze the lens, I don t know which one to choose from 1 out of 2.

Sigma lenses are quite expensive in China. The characteristics of these two lenses are very different.

The Sigma 18-200 is a long zoom sub-factory dog head, with a long focal length, but the imaging quality is low, not much stronger than the high-end DC, and the aperture is limited. Low cost performance, and at the same time pay attention to the problem of out of focus. But the long zoom is very convenient, there is a wide angle and a telephoto, you can shoot birds and shoot wide-angle landscapes.

The Canon 50 is the most cost-effective lens in Canon's prime head. No matter how bad the image quality of the prime lens is, it will not be lower than the quality of the zoom bull, and the large aperture is very playable, and it is also very suitable for portraits. However, if you fix the focus, you can only zoom by walking ......

If you're a newbie, neither is very recommended. On the one hand, although the Sigma 18-200 is convenient for novices to get started, this head is really too bad, and soon you will feel that it has no advantages other than convenience; On the other hand, although the prime head of the 50 is very powerful, novices must be very uncomfortable with the prime head, because you don't know what to shoot yourself, and the 50 is a full-frame head, which is a bit wasteful on the early 500d.

Neither of these lenses is cheap, so it's better to consider a bullish combination like 18-55+50. If you have to choose from these two, the personal preference is 50

Choose 18-200, and the single camera will be equipped with a fixed focus, and the shooting will be limited.

The focal length of 18-200 is sufficient, which can fully meet the needs of daily shooting.

Since I'm a student, I don't have much money, so I'll give it 1000, just to take a sapp, please give me advice. Also, what should I pay attention to when choosing a camera? .Parameters to pay attention to when buying: Buy digital at this time.

1.On the D700, the 24-70 is good, there is a wide angle, and the ultra-wide can be ignored for now.

Imaging is not compatible with 24-70, it is recommended to go to AF 135DC, or AF 180, the imaging is first-class, and in general, the longer the telephoto, the better.

24-70 copes with daily landscape shooting is enough. The second lens needs to be used, if it is a telephoto, it is a telephoto, and the image quality of 70 300 cannot be compared with 70 200, so it is not recommended; If you like to shoot people, go to 85; A fixed focus of 50 should also be owned, and it is generally used as the first prime head to enter. If you only shoot landscapes, then 14-24 ultra-wide is recommended, and 16-35 f4 is a step back.

The choice of SLR lens mainly depends on two aspects:

1. What is your budget.

2. What is the content you often shoot?

I think you can understand what I mean, no, in fact, all the old photographers will ask you this question.

The Canon 600D is APS-C non-full-frame, and the EFS 18-135 is recommended for the more economical one, taking care of both the wide-angle and telephoto ends.

The quality of EFS 15-85 should be the best, ** is also the most expensive, but the focal length is shorter 18-200, the range is larger, the use is wider, the image quality and workmanship are not very good, and several zoom lenses that are not recommended for Tamron Sigma can also be considered, and the cost performance is higher.

It's best to play first.,600D is not worth investing again.,Change the full-frame body if the environment is good.。

Seeing your question added, I will also add it.

If you are filming a wedding, because you can stand relatively close as a videographer, there is no need to use too much telephoto, the normal telephoto end will do.

If you want to do it as a career or a long-term hobby, according to your situation, I would like to recommend a red-circled, EF 24-70, sharp imaging, the best of Canon lenses, it looks more professional on your 600D, and the image quality is good. In the future, if you change to a full-frame body, you can continue to use it.

I highly recommend and hope you consider it.

Choose a second DSLR lens based on your photographic preferences.

The fun of SLR is tossed and tossed, the more functions that can be achieved and the better shooting effect is the reason why many people choose SLR, and the interchangeable lens design of SLR also makes many people hesitate. The ** lens is relatively expensive and has a specialization in the industry, so there are many scruples in choosing, and it is recommended to choose the second lens (except for the set lens) according to the photography preference.

For portrait photography, a large-aperture prime lens is recommended, 35 lenses are selected for indoor portraits with a half-frame body, 50 lenses are used for outdoor portraits, and the maximum aperture f lens can be selected for high budgets; You can choose 50 for indoor portraits of the full fuselage, 85 for outdoor portraits, and you can also choose the highest level of lenses. If you need a visual impact, you can try a wide-angle lens.

It is generally recommended to choose 18-200 or 18-140 focal length lens for tourist scenery, the so-called one-shot world refers to this, and some of the 18-55 and full-frame 24-120 are also available.

Macro flowers and plants, this kind of lens is the first to recommend a 100 micro lens (about 100 mm focal length with macro function), ordinary zoom lens longer focal length is also possible, but not as good as professional macro lens.

Long-range shooting birds, such lenses generally have a focal length of more than 500 mm at the far end, but they are more expensive, after all, they can be called gun barrels, and if the budget is insufficient, you can try the switchback lens of the sub-factory.

Humanistic landscape, this kind of lens is the most commonly used, the general set of lenses belong to this category, in terms of quality, the first 24-70 focal length lens of each manufacturer, the focal length lens is generally of good quality.

Wide-angle lens, this kind of lens is different from the conventional field of view due to the large distortion, giving people a different visual impact, generally recommended 10-24 zoom ultra-wide-angle lens.

The above is a little recommendation about the lens for friends who have just entered the pit, and it is not suitable for people who use more than full frame and experienced photographers.

Choose based on your needs and existing lens systems.

It's really cumbersome and meaningless to list them one by one, and it can be too long and cumbersome.

You can ask me questions or chat with me privately.

Choose a second lens based on your focal length, or don't duplicate focal lengths depending on what you're shooting.

One of the 70 Canon Big Ternary, absolutely bright, maximum Kai number aperture, ultrasonic focus motor, highly recommended, and has no drawbacks on non-full machines other than the loss of a part of the wide angle! Seepage!!

And 100mm is a macro lens, as the saying goes: macro has no weak brigade, Canon this red circle is even more so, sharpness and color are excellent, if you have a hobby for macro photography, it is highly recommended to enter this one, but if you shoot mm, you have to be careful, this head is too sharp, it is easy to expose the flaws of the human face!!

Don't know what footage you have in your hands right now? If you want to talk about cost performance, these two are good value for money, and you will know if you use them.

The zoom lens is convenient, and the fixed focus lens liquid Sun spine head exercise technique, if you want to shoot some humanistic landscapes 2470 is just right, the equivalent focal length of 36-105 is an excellent focal length, because 35mm is the eye of humanity, a must-have for masters.

The red circle is very cool to use, and the probability of being good is very large.

Shun one door has a hundred blessings, the word peace is worth a thousand gold, and Vientiane is updated.

How can there be such a choice, the focal length of the lens is so different, and there are two zooms and one prime focus.

Seeing how you choose, I think it's better to buy 17-50. Stretch to 50 ends for portraits, and around 17 ends for daily life, landscapes, etc.

I really don't understand, picking a lens is only meaningful if it is similar to the focal length and the same zoom (or the same fixed focus), how to use this comparison? The fixed focus must be better than the zoom, and the zoom must be more convenient than the fixed focus, so you first determine what focal length you buy and then ask.

This looks at whether your machine is full-frame or APS, and full-frame 90-bit is definitely the first (and only) choice

APS can consider B005, followed by 70-300, again 90 micro, and finally 16-85

The first lens, the focal length is more commonly used Large aperture The telephoto end can get an excellent background blur effect Shrinking the aperture a few stops is good for shooting portraits.