Will a person who is famous, wealthy, wealthy, and powerful lose his nature? 10

Steel magnate Andrew Carnegie (1835-1919) was an American-Scottish businessman, founder of the Carnegie Steel Company (later renamed American Steel Corporation), and a prominent philanthropist. He is known for founding one of the most powerful and influential companies in American history and for giving up most of his wealth in his later years to fund several libraries and schools in Scotland, the United States, and around the world. From a poor boy to a billionaire, the legend of a big philanthropist.

Bill Gates, whose full name is William Henry Gates (October 28, 1955), is the chairman of the American Microsoft Corporation. Together with Paul Allen, he founded Microsoft Corporation, served as Microsoft's CEO and Chief Software Designer, and holds more than 8% of the company's common stock, making it the company's largest individual shareholder. From 1995 to 2007, Bill Gates was the richest man in the world for 13 consecutive years.

On June 27, 2008, he officially withdrew from Microsoft and donated all his $58 billion personal wealth to the Bill and Melinda Gates** meeting. In March 2012, the Forbes list of the world's richest people was released, and Bill Gates ranked second with $61 billion.

Warren Buffett (born August 30, 1930) was born in Omaha, Nebraska, USA. In 2008, he surpassed Bill Gates in wealth and became the richest man in the world on the Forbes list. In the 11th charity fundraiser, Buffett's lunch auction reached a record $2.63 million.

In July 2010, Warren Buffett made another donation to five charities**, equivalent to $100 million in current market capitalization. This is the third-largest donation since Warren Buffett began giving 99% of his assets in 2006.

Excuse me, will a person who is famous, wealthy, and powerful lose his nature?

I think it is necessary to analyze the specific situation, keeping the heart is the most important, people living in the real society, are pursuing fame, fortune and wealth, but I want to pursue these things not because of the world, but because I just want to live better, and the reason why I want to be better or because I hope to enjoy a happy life process, because the living people are born without bringing death and not taking away, so if you maintain the original intention of enjoying a happy life, how can you lose your essence.

Of course, some people will get lost in fame and fortune, but they will eventually find their way back.

If he had been like this since he was a child, he would not normally. If it's a phoenix male type, it depends on his concentration.

As long as you don't forget your roots. No amount of external matter is useless.

Man lives to know himself. It has to do with what you said about losing nature, and a lot of people are never aware of it, so they don't know themselves, they don't know their nature, they don't know that they're lost in nature. Always pushed by social favors, never lived out of himself.

But it's hard to jump out, so you have to be yourself. Have your own goals and beliefs, be kind to others, be less calculating, and have less material desires.

It won't be so serious, look at the Buddhist scriptures to dissolve, but don't look at the monks

First of all, I don't disagree with you, but I don't affirm your point either! The cruelty of reality is a fact, but there are still good and upright people in life! Maybe in the chaotic life, the people we see only have interests in their eyes, but the good people are always unknown, so gradually we will forget about them!

In fact, I am also afraid of the cruelty of reality, once I walked on the street and saw two people fighting for one yuan, I really don't understand them? This made me cherish the friendship between my classmates even more! Since you have stepped into society, since you hate the cruelty of reality, then you should be brave to face the reality, no matter what the reality is, as long as we stick to our principles and have a clear conscience!

When the judicial organs determine a crime, it is a very serious and rigorous activity. "All the evidence shows that he killed his wife", these are not enough to prove a person's guilt, all the evidence needs to form a complete chain of evidence to prove that the suspect has committed a crime before he can be found guilty, and the evidence in any link is missing or incomplete cannot be finally determined. According to the principle of "no guilt in doubt", the criminal responsibility of the parties concerned cannot be pursued.

Relevant provisions: Article 195 of the Criminal Procedure Law: After the defendant's final statement, the chief judge announces an adjournment, and the collegial panel conducts deliberations and makes the following judgments on the basis of the ascertained facts, evidence, and relevant legal provisions:

1) Where the facts of the case are clear, the evidence is credible and sufficient, and the defendant is found guilty on the basis of law, a guilty verdict shall be made;

2) Where the defendant is found not guilty in accordance with law, a not-guilty verdict shall be made;

3) Where the evidence is insufficient and the defendant cannot be found guilty, a not-guilty verdict shall be made that the evidence is insufficient and the alleged crime cannot be established.

The Simpson Wife Murder Case.

Simpson, a retired black football star in the United States, killed his white ex-wife and his ex-wife's boyfriend, and everyone knew he was responsible, but the jury found him not guilty.

There were many suspicious points in the case, and there were irregularities in the procedure.

Moreover, because the case was handled at that time, there were racist words and deeds (there is evidence to prove it), and the jury was black and so on.

Everything shows that procedural justice is above judicial justice!

Because one piece of the prosecutor's evidence was false, all the previous testimony was overturned.

The Simpson Wife Murder Case.

Mainly because of procedural problems in the United States. The white cop who testified was guilty of lying. So the evidence was not admitted by the jury. The jury at the time was mostly black.

It is obvious that there is no conviction if there is insufficient evidence, and the jury must also decide on the basis of the evidence, and of course cannot convict.

The best way to deal with this scoundrel is to assassinate him!

1. Don't take evil as small, don't take good as small. Romance of the Three Kingdoms" Liu Beiyu.

Don't do anything because it's a small, inconspicuous bad thing; On the contrary, for some tiny. But do a good thing that is good for others, and don't stop doing it because it doesn't mean much.

2. Seeing the good is like not being good, and seeing the bad is like exploring the soup. The Analects

When you see a good person, you are afraid that you will not have time to learn from him, and when you see a good thing, you are afraid that you will not be able to do it if you are late. When you see wicked people and bad things, it is like touching hot water, so you should leave immediately and stay away.

3. Don't forget the past, the teacher of the future.

From "Warring States Policy: Zhao Ceyi".

Lessons learned from the past can be used as a reference for future work.

4. Lost in the east, harvested mulberry.

From the Book of the Later Han Dynasty

書之東隅, 稭之三榆 is a Chinese idiom, pinyin is shī zhī dōng yú, shōu zhī sāng yú, which originally means to lose first in one place and eventually gain in another. The parable begins to fail on one side and triumphs on the other.

Now it is verified that the east corner is Zhengzhou, and Sangyu is Kaifeng. EAST also means morning, and mulberry also refers to dusk.

5. Zi said: "When you learn it, don't you also say it?" Have friends come from afar, are you happy? People don't know and are not ashamed, and they are not gentlemen? ”

From the Analects

Confucius said:"Isn't it fun to study and review on time? Isn't it nice to have like-minded people from afar? Others don't understand me, but I'm not angry, isn't it also a morally cultivated person? "

Go to the bookstore and buy a copy of "Arguments and Arguments".

He asked who had.

I didn't ask you to write that I have.

Whoever has self-esteem will be respected - Balzac.

Yes. Someday it will suffer.

It depends on what you say! Right, no.