Seek help from legal experts, kneel down and beg legal experts

In China, only the state and collectives have land ownership. Urban land and suburban land that is not collectively owned are owned by the State; Rural land is collectively owned.

Ordinary natural and legal persons only enjoy the right to use land in accordance with the law. The land use right is a usufructuary right, and the buildings on the land enjoy ownership in accordance with the law. When the state expropriates and expropriates your land use rights and ownership of the attachments on the ground, you can ask the state to give you appropriate compensation.

First of all, landowners have the right to rent, buy and sell their land.

Secondly, the owner has the right to build buildings on the land at will (in the absence of expropriation by the State).

Again, if the state expropriates the land, and you don't give it, you have to deal with it, because all the land belongs to the state.

Since it is inconvenient to say, then refer to the following answer, which is very standard.

The land is only owned by the right to use, and the attachments to the land have ownership.

1. The owner has the right to occupy, use and benefit from the land. In general, to put it simply, the rights of the landowner to the land are the same as the rights of the owner of the commercial house.

2. As for the rights of the buildings on the land, it depends on the agreement between the owner of the building and the owner of the land. The installation of any above-ground structure on or below the land shall be subject to the consent of the landowner, unless it is necessary for the public interest. No one has the right to build on land owned by others without an agreement.

Supplementary question: From your supplementary question, it should be the right to use the land. If this is the case, the relevant rights of the land-use right holder to the buildings on the land depend on the agreement between the land-use right holder and the building owner.

The consent of the landowner and then the consent of the land-use right holder shall be obtained for the buildings to be built on the land. If a building can be built on the land on which you have the right to use the land, then the owner of the building should obtain your consent when constructing it, and if the construction is carried out without consent, the user has the right to request the other party to demolish it and compensate for it.

1.The land is owned by the state or collective, and you have the right to occupy, use, and benefit;

2.You build the building, and you own it.

I guess you should have the disability appraisal report in your hand, right?

See which agency is authenticating? You can go to the appraisal agency to check the low grade of the appraisal record, according to the cases I have done before, you must submit the inpatient medical record for disability evaluation, and there are records of the appraisal process of the appraisal personnel, as well as the expert assessment records, you can go to the appraisal agency to view. So, so that you can find a breakthrough in this case.

If the appraisal agency determines that there is evidence of 4 rib fractures, then you can claim compensation from the insurance company.

If the accreditation agency does not have one, then you should sue the accreditation agency

First, first of all, be deeply sympathetic to your experience, be open-minded and gladly face it;

Second, now manufacturers, merchants are uneven, the attitude towards consumers before and after buying is completely different, in the case of two bad repairs for merchants, it should be incumbent on consumers to replace.

3. Continue to negotiate with the merchant, you are a newly bought mobile phone, and the inside is old, isn't that fraud?

Fourth, if the merchant ignores it, you should explain the stakes to him face to face, and if he does not give you a change, you will be held accountable according to law.

Fifth, keep the purchase invoices, as well as maintenance documents, to the consumer association, can also be reported to the industrial and commercial bureau, the store has obvious fraud, really not can also sue the court, not on dozens of yuan of litigation fees, we also call him troublesome.

1.About the determination of work-related injuries:

You were injured while catching a thief outside of work, so it cannot be regarded as a work-related injury, and the employer does not have the problem of determining a work-related injury as long as it proves that you were not injured while at work.

2.About insults, slander.

Your case does not fall under the category of insult and defamation.

Insult, defamation requires the use of violence or other means to "blatantly" insult another person or fabricate facts to slander another person, and the circumstances are serious.

Pay attention to whether the employer insults you in public, and whether the circumstances are serious, which needs to be considered.

3.If you catch a thief, it is an act of twisting, but the protection of the person who is being twisted in our country's laws is very weak, and the relevant system is not perfect.

4.It is advisable to recognize that your actions are not a work injury. You can ask the police to help you issue a certificate to prove that you were injured because you caught a thief, so as to reconcile with the unit.

If you have to file a lawsuit, you can only file a lawsuit for moral damages on the grounds that your personal dignity has been damaged, but if the employer does not go too far, it will be difficult for you to win the lawsuit.

Thank you and hope it helps.