About the advantages and disadvantages of win98, win2000, winxp, linux

98 is relatively old, the stability is not very good, fortunately, the compatibility is good, 2000 is based on NT technology, the stability has been greatly improved, XP uses the same kernel as 2000, except that the interface is more gorgeous, and the hardware requirements are higher, there are no characteristics. The Linux system has now been greatly improved, it is not very difficult for novices to operate, the security is good, and at this stage, the threat to viruses is negligible. The disadvantage is that there are many versions, there are incompatibilities between each other, and the common software in the family is a little lacking compared with Windows, but as a server, there are many powerful, simple to operate, free and free application software, at this stage, Linux is more suitable for servers, desktop applications, and there has been a great breakthrough.

The system is relatively stable. It is the first choice for machines with low configurations. But it's easy to crash.。。

Stable than 98. It's better to use this for 128 memory.

XP is the most stable system available. Very easy to use. Suitable for personal use. Can't be a server. 256 RAM will run just fine. Good compatibility with the game.

Can be used as a server. Not suitable for personal use. It's more difficult to operate. It's hard to get started for beginners. Do server stability. It is relatively safe compared to Windows.

98 simple. The 2000 system is not very demanding. XP is powerful.

Linux is stable.

98 is safe but not good.

2000 is not good.

XP is not secure but fast.

Linux is stable.

Apples are good.

2000 is better for networking (LAN), and 2003 can also be used

As far as the current mainstream configuration is concerned, 98 and me have almost no advantages other than good support for 16-bit programs.

In terms of system stability, functions, and core, WinXP is far beyond the others, but the configuration requirements of XP have also been improved a lot.

98 system is suitable for computers with low computer configuration, and the minimum configuration requirements of 2000 are 256 memory, and the minimum requirements of XP are also 256 memory but it is best to be more than 512 (including 512), the compatibility of the 98 operating system is not very good, and it does not support other language input, 2000 has more vulnerabilities, and 2000 and XP support other language input. At present, XP is relatively stable, so XP is generally used in PCs.

It's just some of the systems that Microsoft came out with

Win98 is 98 out of Windows 98 98 Win2000 is 00 out of Windows 2000 WinXP is 2002 out of XP experience of the system!!

You'll know the difference if you've used it

The difference is that the functionality has been added a bit.

Win2003, Linux, Unix, Solaris Leak Distributor Sun, Vista, HP-UX (HP Land Search and Early Staring), Mac OS X Developer Apple, etc.

In addition to the poor sharing of the 98 system, sometimes you can't find your neighbors in the network. And you won't be able to access the shared data on the NTFS partition in the 2000 and XP systems!

XP's Group Policy has contradictory settings, and by default, XP's shared resources may not be accessible, but you can adjust it.

A typical problem is that 98 and XPH have a possible problem with mutual access to open guest users in XP.

When there are win98 and win2000 in the same network, the server should be win98. There will be nothing going on.

WinXP is universal, generally used for personal work or usually on the Internet, Win2000 is used as a server, compared with the two, the former loads some commonly used drivers, such as 3D acceleration when playing games, etc. Win2000 startup won't load these, which will cause you to not be able to play some 3D games. And it will load some services that are not used by individual users to make servers.

XP is stable, 2000 performance is acceptable, or XP is good, and it can avoid unnecessary problems.

Once, 2000 suddenly reported that the virtual memory was insufficient, and as a result, Lao Tzu's machine was paralyzed, and another time when using XP, the virtual memory was also insufficient, but in the end, it also lasted until I modified the virtual memory, so well! Of course, XP is good, and the compatibility is also good!

2000 is three letters, and the disadvantage is to press three times. But it's easy to write, three strokes.

XP is two letters, press it twice. But it's cumbersome to write, and it takes four strokes.

Haha dizzy! This year's most humorous answer award! Dude: It's awarded to you! ~

XP performance is better, 2000 times! It's best to use XP !!

Follow these steps:

Open the disk where the XP system is located, usually the C disk, point"tools"--"Folder options"---"Check"and put one of them inside"Hide protected operating system files"The front hook removes the ---"OK", and then look at the root directory of the C drive, and find one.

file,After opening,Delete win98,win2000,Ghost line,Leave only something like the following:

boot loader]

timeout=0

default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\windows

operating systems]

multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\windows="microsoft windows xp professional" /noexecute=optin /fastdetect

The landlord had better refer to the content of this file on someone else's machine, there may be slight differences, or search for the content of the file on the Internet, because if you delete the mistake, it is very likely that the system will not start!

Remember! Good luck to the landlord!

One of the most solitary ways is to modify the file and remove the other items.

Here's how: Right-click on my computer --- Properties--- Advanced ---"Boot and failback"below the settings and then select in the dialog box that pops up""In the open file, place 98. All of the 2000's are removed, leaving only the following:

boot loader]

timeout=5

default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\windows

operating systems]

multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\windows="microsoft windows xp professional" /noexecute=optin /fastdetect

This is only your XP, not even Ghost.

Of course, you can also leave the ghost line behind, and that's it.

There are a lot of problems with Windows, so bear with me.

In fact, there are no very strict requirements between memory and operating system, just like 64M memory can run win2000 (I once installed the system for an old gentleman is really tried), but it is very slow. But in general, the bigger the memory, the better. For the three Windows operating systems mentioned in your question, the use of 256M memory modules can basically meet the needs.

Of course, there are some system compatibility issues here, for example, the graphics card you use can't be too bad, otherwise it will be very stuck even if you use 1G memory. Therefore, we must consider the compatibility of the CPU with the operating system, including memory, graphics card, network card, and even the motherboard, so that it can achieve the optimal configuration, so that you can get a better experience!

512 is better, and it's no problem to play 3D games, but the most commonly used is 256