Who do you think will win between Britain and Germany?

Actually, it's pretty much the same, but I'm rooting for England, and although they didn't play very well, I'm sure the winner will go to the final.

I support Germany!

When it comes to Germany, the English must have mixed feelings, both a faint worry and an urge to kill it as soon as possible. In continental competitions such as the World Cup and the European Championship, the Germans have left England with several gnashing hatreds.

The last time the two teams met at the World Cup was in 1990, when Robson Sr. led England to West Germany side of Beckenbauer in a 1-1 draw after 120 minutes, before the Germans won on penalties and won the tournament.

One of the most regrettable defeats for England was in the semi-finals of Euro 1996, when hosts England had a strong momentum but met a different rival, Shearer's goal gave England the lead, but the tenacious Germans equalised through Kuntz, and the final plot was the same: on England's doorstep, the Germans once again won on penalties.

In contrast, England's victories were either too long ago (4-2 in the 1966 final) or in qualifiers, group stages, the most exciting of which was a 5-1 victory in Munich in 2001 and a 1-0 win in the group stage of the 2000 European Championships.

The two teams met again in the knockout stages of the tournament, with the Germans winning the first two times, and for the English, there was one spell that scared them: penalties. England and Germany are almost polar in front of the penalty spot, the Germans are the best team in the world to take penalties, and England are almost certain to lose in penalty shootouts (1990 World Cup, Euro 1996, 1998 World Cup, Euro 2004, 2006 World Cup all lost on penalties) It can even be said that England need to settle the battle in 120 minutes if they want to eliminate Germany, otherwise once they stand on the penalty spot, the winner will almost certainly be the Germans.

Germany could not beat Britain because Britain's "resources" far exceeded those of Germany. Britain had the most powerful navy and the largest colonies in the world at the time, and it firmly controlled the sea and the Suez Canal. Germany's attempt to force Britain to surrender quickly could not be achieved, and the European homeland he had defeated was only a loose alliance that was forced to attack the Soviet Union.

First, the justice of the war, the German fascists were the aggressor side. The second geographical reason, all the German outlets to the sea are surrounded by the British Isles, and they are strategically in a passive situation, which is why Germany is going to attack Norway and France, in order to obtain ports for foreign contact, the Tirpitz hiding in the Norwegian fjords and the U-boat hiding on the Atlantic coast of France are the lingering nightmare of the allied ships. Third, the gap in military equipment, Britain's accumulation in the aviation industry is still better, all kinds of fighters and bombers, more importantly, radar equipment is the key to turning the tide of the war, the end of the British air war also means that Germany has lost the British strategy, the British in the later period through the strategic bombing of Germany constantly wear down the will of the Germans, the German war machine, the bombing of the Ruhr Dam, the bombing of Hamburg and other large cities in Germany almost leveled the German cities, in the navy, Britain's advantage is even greater than anything to add.

Fourth, there is the support of the United States and other allies.

It's not that he can't fight, but he thinks that the Germans and the Anglo-Saxons are one and the same, so he didn't fight hard, but after beating the British away, he went to fight on the Eastern Front and fought with the Slavs.

Because during World War II, Britain received the support of the United States' massive productive forces, **, and army. And Germany was short of supplies.

It's not that Germany really can't beat Britain, but that Germany had a very long front at that time, and Germany actually didn't really fight with the British, whether it was Dunkirk retreating, it was fighting with the British and French forces at that time, and the most important thing was the French, the British air war, and at that time it was only in the army with the air force to fight with the British, but the war was still not realized.

During World War II, Germany defeated Britain in a complete and overwhelming manner. It's just that later, by mistake, the front was stretched by mistake and suffered a crushing defeat when attacking the Soviet Union, so that it was defeated and retreated.

The British army was inferior to the German army, so there was a great defeat in Dunkirk and North Africa. The navy Germany was weak, relying on submarines to block the transport line, causing great losses to the British army, but still failed to block the North African route, and was successfully counterattacked by the British army. On the contrary, the German army in North Africa was not logistically good, and Rommel was eventually defeated.

The Air Force is evenly matched in Britain and Germany, so the Sea Lion program runs aground.

In World War II, Germany did not have enough sea supremacy, air supremacy was lost in the Battle of Britain, and Germany could not defeat Britain.

During World War II, Britain was separated by the English Channel, otherwise Germany would have destroyed it long ago. Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union defeated Germany, and Britain alone could not defeat Germany.

I can't beat it, it's just that the stall is too big and it's pulling.

Too much investment and too much consumption on the Eastern Front.

If the eastern front is not opened, only the west is fought, and Britain will be long gone.

Germany offended the Jews and turned all the European and American powers that could be bought off by money against them.

Germany fought on multiple fronts, and Germany's population and resources could not support a multi-front offensive.

With too many troops in the world and the English Channel across the trenches, it will be difficult to win.

Germany fought on two fronts, and its main opponent was the Soviet Union and the United States, and if Britain fought against Germany alone, I am afraid that three Britains would not be enough.

How so? Suppose A's combat ability is 9 points, but there are no allies who work, and the HP is only 5 points, there is a possibility of one turn game over; Although B's combat ability is only 5 points, B has allies who are better than himself, and his health is 30, so there is no possibility of one turn game over.

Who will win in this situation, you say? Most likely it is b. This A is about Germany, and B is about the United Kingdom.

If you know about the Dunkirk retreat and the Sea Lion plan, you will know how badly Britain was defeated, and it was beaten and could not raise its head.

There is no head-to-head confrontation between the Yin Kingdom.

Extremely unlikely!

Hitler actually gave up hope for the Sea Lion project only at the last minute in the midst of repeated trade-offs. The German army had an assessment of the invasion of Britain (mainly the naval opinion represented by Raeder) that Germany did not have a navy that could compete with the British, so it was impossible to choose the landing site arbitrarily (like the Normandy landing), and the more realistic plan was to open a safe enough passage in the Calais Strait, which was closest to the British, to allow the landing force to go ashore, which was also the basic point of the Sea Lion plan, (which even influenced the defensive combat concept of the later Normandy landing).

Even such a small project required Germany to build a large number of landing craft and aircraft, which would have taken several years at the German production capacity at that time. Combined with the situation of the Normandy landings, even taking into account the superiority of the German Army, victory in air battles (this possibility is possible), and the non-invasion of the Soviet Union, etc., the gap in force between Germany and Britain is much smaller than the gap between Britain and Germany (west) in 1944; The Normandy landings were occupied by the time (due to the influence of the climate, it was difficult for Germany to obtain accurate weather forecasts, and this was a necessary condition for air superiority, etc.), geographical advantages (the United States and Britain could choose the landing site at will, etc.), people (the French Mainland Resistance Group, etc.), and even intelligence advantages, but the victory or defeat was also on the front line, so the possibility of success if the German army adopted a landing operation was extremely small.

Of course, it would be a different matter if Germany took measures in the Middle East, but then a conflict with the Soviet Union would be even more inevitable.

The path to German victory, which I envisioned as a layman, was: stop after the annexation of Czechoslovakia! Stop the invasion of Poland, and even France and the Soviet Union, at most take similar measures in the Middle East for greater benefits.

The invasion of Poland swallowed the chronic poison, the invasion of France swallowed the strong poison, and the invasion of the Soviet Union was bound to fail. Or that Hitler had already won, but the Versailles complex, the eastern living space complex, led him to his demise.

It is impossible, because the British navy is too strong, and the German air force cannot defeat the British, and the army is useless if it cannot land on the British mainland, so Hitler is stunned that there is nothing to do with the British.

Under normal circumstances, it can't be beaten, Britain is very strong and can't take it, otherwise he wouldn't have fought the Soviet Union, because the Soviet-Finnish war was actually Finland's strength, which made European countries at that time underestimate the Soviet Union. During World War II, Britain's air force was actually very strong, Chamberlain vigorously developed the air force during his administration, and Britain is a global maritime country. It was simply impossible for Germany to land on British soil.

Coupled with the relationship between the leaders of Britain and the United States at that time, there was also general sympathy for Britain and France in the United States, and it was only a matter of time before the United States entered the war. Dunkirk If the British Army is completely annihilated, it should be said that it will not be able to force the royal family and ** to Canada.

Of course it's possible ... Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, stretched the front too long, made a strategic mistake and dealt a devastating blow to the German army... All this has become history and cannot be repeated, and if we make an assumption, of course we don't want the fascists to win from a psychological level, hehe.

If Germany can destroy or severely damage the encircled Anglo-French forces in Dunkirk, and then have an aircraft carrier fleet and airborne radar, and win the air battle of Great Britain and have absolute air supremacy, then with the wolf pack tactics of the German Navy's U-boats and the cover of the aircraft carrier fleet, the German Army's steel torrent can land in Britain, hehe, the German Army is comparable to Britain, at this time, Churchill should think about how to retreat, and after Germany obtains Britain, it can use this as a springboard, and the United States will prepare for a home war, All this is based on the fact that little Japan launched the Pacific War, contained the United States, the Soviet Union didn't care, and the mustache didn't mess with the Soviet Union, and then Germany and Japan joined forces to fight the United States, does the old United States still have to play?

It is very likely, leaving aside other countries, London would have fallen long ago if it had been for Britain alone.

After Germany occupied France, Britain and other vital forces had been basically destroyed, important strategic materials and equipment had been lost in France, and Germany's morale and other aspects had the basis for defeating Britain, and many people in Britain had lost confidence and courage. But instead of taking Britain in one fell swoop, Germany provoked the sleeping polar bear.

Without the English Channel, the German Army was capable of defeating the British. The main thing is that the Navy is not competitive.

Yes, Hitler and Napoleon made a mistake at the same time, fighting on two fronts, which was dangerous.

100% 1!! At that time, the German bombing was about to make Britain surrender, but the British held out for a few days, and the Germans were so good that they couldn't fight it, so they didn't fight... Gou UK.

If Germany had fought against Britain in World War II, it would have won.

Britain could have been defeated by Germany without the support of the United States. During World War II, the United States provided Britain with a large amount of equipment through Lend-Lease.

The key role is the Soviet Union, or without the Soviet Union, Britain will hang first, and then the United States will also be finished. It can be said that the allies have played a role.

Germany opened a multi-faceted front, the front was too long, resulting in transportation, ** could not keep up, if the unilateral battle, Britain would be destroyed sooner or later.

If he doesn't mess with the USSR, then Britain will be abolished.

What would have happened to the world if Germany had won World War II? It's hard to believe after reading it.

In that case, Europe would become one and fight together against the Bolsheviks, that is, the Soviet Union.

Perhaps Hitler would have wiped out France and other European countries that were weaker in World War II. (^

Western Europe would be completely ruled by Germany, and Germany would attack the USSR.

Hit. Britain was one of the main anti-fascist forces in Europe during World War II, and it was also one of the few countries in Western Europe that had not been occupied by the German army.

Of course, Germany bombed Britain in order to force Britain to surrender, and the air force fought. Anglo-French forces and Germany - the Great Retreat from Dunkirk. Later, a second front was opened, and the Anglo-American forces and Germany were at war.

Montgomery and Rommel were at war, wasn't it Britain and Germany fighting!

The Battle of Britain was a large-scale air battle waged by Nazi Germany against Britain during World War II (1940–1941).

Satellite map to see Germany, Britain, France, why did Germany never defeat Britain in World War II?