Some people say that ruthlessness is the most readable, and righteousness is mostly for dog slaughte

In fact, I think this statement is wrong, not all scholars are ruthless, and reckless people are not all righteous, and everything must be looked at separately.

Say that you are very right, because you read too many books, are scheming, think too much, and are more unkind. I haven't read any books, but I have dealt with people a lot, I know how to be sophisticated, and I am righteous.

There are thousands of things in the world, and you can't generalize. Among the scholars, even after seeing through the hypocrisy of the world, they can still treat others in the world with their original intentions, and there are many people; For the sake of fame and fortune, there are not a few people who cannot adhere to the bottom line of intellectuals. As for the peddlers and pawns, the old way is full of hot intestines; Succumb to the pressure of life, take care of everything, take advantage of any cheapness, and sleek and snobbish villains can be seen everywhere.

The level of education will have an impact on the formation of each person's three views, but the most basic concept of good and evil in human nature only exists in everyone's nature, and will not be easily changed by how much they read. The road knows the horsepower, and the people will see it for a long time.

It's too absolute, and it's also very one-sided, I don't think it's correct, people who read books are actually generally of high quality, not like what is said here.

I don't think it's right to say this, it's not comprehensive, and some people who read books still have feelings, so they can't be so one-sided.

Nothing is absolute, it depends on what kind of person a person is, what kind of person he is.

There are some things that you still don't always have to make such conclusions about the reader because of this.

We can't let go of a certain relationship because in this relationship, we really give, we invest a lot of emotion, time, money, energy, etc., etc., in this relationship, but in the end we can't get the results we want.

Nothing can be said to be absolute, because everything in our natural world is opposite.

As the saying goes, "Every time you slaughter dogs, you are a reader"?

Most of the righteous people are slaughtering dogs, and the most ruthless reader means that most of the people who are righteous are ordinary people who are engaged in menial occupations, while knowledgeable people often do things that violate their conscience, betray them, or leak their feelings.

If you are poor, you will be left alone.

This is the highest personality ideal of ancient scholars. However, under the oppression of real life, it was difficult for a considerable number of talents in ancient times to be alone, so in the face of some small favors and small profits, they would lose their personality ideals. If such a well-known personality declaration as "the poor and the lowly cannot be moved, and the mighty cannot be bowed" is delayed, it will be difficult for them to manifest it in their actual actions.

Of course, "every righteous slaughter dog."

The saying "negative hearts are all readers" was summed up by the ancients based on their own life experience, just to take an example.

Speaking of things, there is a suspicion of generalization, which does not mean that all readers and butchers are like this. After all, every industry is a black sheep, and it has always been that way from ancient times to the present day.

This sentence is about another aspect of human nature, which is to warn people not to be deceived by appearances, but to pay attention to inner qualities and values.

"Righteousness is mostly dog slaughtering" means that some people who seem to be very righteous and righteous on the surface, but in fact they are not kind in their hearts and misbehave. And "slaughtering dogs" also means killing animals unnecessarily, which is itself an immoral act. The "dog slaughterers" here refer to these people who are very type and promising on the surface, but in fact they are hypocritical and righteous, and their inner morality is worse than that of poisonous dogs.

And "the most ruthless reader" wants people to pay attention to the comparison with the other extreme of Hu Shenqi - those who seem cold and ruthless, but have good hearts and are very knowledgeable. The "ruthless reader" here refers to people who are calm, rational and not emotional, usually because they are very self-disciplined, devote all their time to their professional studies, and are considered to be cold and ruthless human beings.

To sum up, the meaning of this statement is that benevolent people are often not as good as they appear on the surface, and sometimes they may even be hypocritical, and truly kind-hearted and learned people do not necessarily behave mildly and lovingly. Therefore, when we choose friends to make friends or evaluate a person's qualities, we should not be deceived by appearances, but carefully analyze and evaluate a person's internal situation and situation.

Every time you slaughter more dogs, you are more likely to be a reader." It means that most of the people who are righteous are ordinary people who are engaged in lowly occupations, while knowledgeable people often do things that go against conscience, blindness, and betrayal of feelings.

This is not a sentence from a poem, but a couplet. "Every time you slaughter the dogs, you are a reader." This is a famous couplet by the Ming Dynasty poet Cao Xuejiao, which means that most of the people who preach righteousness are ordinary people who are engaged in menial occupations, while knowledgeable people often do things that violate their conscience and betray their feelings.

In the same way, there are also words such as "literati have no line", "literati are light", "literati have no bones" and other forms of cultivation words, and even "cynical".

The meaning extends to the literati who are as flattering as dogs, and it can be regarded as extremely contemptuous of scholars.

Cao Xuegao is a native of Hongtang Township, Houguan Pai County, Fuzhou Prefecture, Fujian Province, and has studied literature, poetry, geography, astronomy, Zen theory, music and rhythm, and hundreds of schools of thought, especially poetry. In the twenty-third year of Wanli, the 21-year-old Cao Xuegao was a high school jinshi, and successively served as the head of the household department, the Langzhong of the household department in Nanjing, and the right political participation in Sichuan and the envoy according to the inspection.

Guangxi Right Senator and other positions. The couplet "Every time you slaughter more dogs, you are more likely to be a scholar" was created during his tenure in Guangxi.

At that time, the royal family of the Ming Dynasty was mostly scattered all over the country, and the emperor of the sky was far away, and they were often arrogant and lawless, and they were good at raising fighting dogs.

The house slaves also relied on themselves to be the royal family slaves and arrogant, not only oppressing the people, but even the government in their eyes! Cao Xueyan is an upright official and does not enforce the law. Before he arrived in Guangxi, he learned that the Guilin clan had always been arrogant and often engaged in illegal behavior.

After taking office, he secretly decided to kill the prestige of these villains.

Probably said that in a case under Cao Xuega's rule, a rich man's dog bit a Xiucai, and a butcher killed the dog out of righteousness, and the rich man in turn bought Xiucai and asked the butcher to pay for the dog's life. Cao Xuegan saw through the trick.

dealt with the matter fairly, and was therefore angry at Xiucai's ingratitude, so there was this couplet.

Cao Xuegan's heavy sentence:

The butcher is not guilty; Xiucai, get along with dogs, recognize dogs as friends, take revenge, remove fame, and be a dog to the emperor!

and angrily wrote on the case file: "Every time you slaughter more dogs, you are more likely to be a reader".

Let's talk about the source of this sentence first. There was a person named Cao Xuege in the Ming Dynasty, who was an official in Guilin at that time, and there was a house slave in the local Ming clan who let the dog bite a Xiucai, and was saved by a butcher who killed the dog, and when the case was judged, Xiucai was afraid of power, and took the money to frame the butcher, and Cao Xuege saw through it, and finally the butcher was not guilty, and the person involved and Xiucai were sentenced. Afterwards, Cao Xueyan wrote this sentence.

Such stories are still happening to this day. "Everything is inferior, only reading is high", it seems to be in awe of readers, but there is really friction, we are not talking about reason, but fists, fists may be violence, or power. Therefore, it doesn't matter whether the righteousness of the dog slaughterers is justified or not, what matters is the dog slaughtering knife he is carrying.

First, first of all, Cao Xueyan wrote in a state of anger, which is inevitably a little prejudiced. Righteousness or not has little to do with the level of education. What he meant should be that Xiucai should understand the importance of faith and righteousness after reading books, so readers should be a little more righteous than the dog slaughterers.

Second, we usually seem to have relatively low moral requirements for the "dog slaughterer", so once he does a "righteous" thing, he seems to have a special sense of justice. As for the talent of scholars, the moral expectations are relatively high, and once one is not righteous, he will be sprayed immediately: "Look, there are still intellectuals, and they are not righteous at all."

3. Whether a person can "fight for righteousness" is usually related to his own conditions. The "dog slaughterer" is relatively at the bottom of the society, and has fewer concerns, and the "scholar" has many concerns after years of education, and he will weigh the pros and cons.

You don't see the people who slaughter dogs are ungrateful, but reading and educating people makes people upright.

Every time he slaughters dogs, most of them are scholars." This is a famous couplet by the Ming Dynasty poet Cao Xuejiao.

Cao Xuejiao (1574-1646) was a scholar and bibliophile in the Ming Dynasty, and the first of the ten sons of Fujian.

Righteousness slaughters more dogs, and ruthlessness is the most reader" means that most of the people who are righteous are ordinary people who are engaged in lowly professions, while knowledgeable people often do things that violate their conscience and betray their feelings.

This sentence contains two pairs of antonyms, one pair of antonyms is "righteousness" and "negative heart", and the other pair is "dog slaughterer" and "reader". This sentence of confrontation shows that people who have a huge contrast in origin and status do things that are even more contrasting, to highlight that scholars are often treacherous and unwilling; And the ignorant and ignorant people in the market attach importance to love and righteousness, loyalty and courage.

1. "Every time you slaughter more dogs, ruthlessness is the most reader" means: most of the people who are righteous are ordinary people who are engaged in menial occupations, while knowledgeable people often do things that violate their conscience and betray their feelings. Righteousness means upholding justice and having righteousness.

2. "Righteousness" example sentence: The fourth fold of "Debt in the Afterlife": "It is for me to save the poor and help the needy, to squander wealth and righteousness, and to do blessings and sorrows." ”