Would you rather take your parents pension to serve the elderly, or would you rather have nothing t

It is said that raising children to prevent old age is a very traditional concept, for parents, raising children is to hope that the child can support themselves when they are firm, but in real life, there are several children born in a family. Because all children are not given equal love, and there are no good material conditions, many people are not able to have a very close relationship with their parents. When I get old, I will not choose to support my parents because of their pension, and they will not completely ignore the pension because they do not have a pension, which is the obligation of every child.

1. They should fulfill their obligations. For every child, they have the obligation to support their parents, and when they enjoy the power at the same time, they naturally need to fulfill their obligations, and it is a natural thing to take care of their parents, regardless of whether the other party has a pension or not, they should take care of their parents. If you take care of your parents just for the sake of retirement, then such a life loses its meaning, and the relationship between parents and children loses its meaning.

2. Everyone needs to repay their parents. When parents gave us a lot of care when they were young, parents would always selflessly dedicate themselves to their children, and they were never willing to cause more trouble to their children. Supporting one's parents is a responsibility, an obligation, but he should be more of a kind of love, everyone needs to repay the love of their parents, when parents have never cared, why do children have to worry too much when they repay their parents.

3. Money is not everything. There are not many retired elites of parents, if it is a qualified child, it is the parents who should take care of themselves, even if they can't really do it themselves, they should also contribute. Money is not everything, and family affection is not measured by money, if it is just for a retirement to take care of their own parents and nannies.

In contrast, I prefer the former, because I think that with my parents' pension, my parents will be more at ease in the future, and they will not feel that they are a burden to their children.

I am willing to take my parents' pension to serve the elderly, because the elderly have worked hard to raise us, and we should be filial.

Willing to take the pension to serve the elderly, even if their parents do not have a pension, their parents should serve themselves when they are old, not to mention that they have a pension to take, because this is the obligation of children.

Of course, we must serve the elderly, whether we give money or not, it is our duty to support the elderly, and we cannot shirk our responsibility.

Willing to take the parents' pension to serve the elderly, respecting the old and loving the young is a traditional virtue, our parents raised us young, we should have raised them old, even if they do not have a pension, I will not sit idly by. The crow knows how to feed, let alone people?

Regardless of whether parents have a pension or not, as children, when they are old, we should serve them, the pension belongs to them, they can spend it as they like, and the children have no right to spend their pension, after all, this is a guarantee for them when they are old.

If you can, who wants to take that dropout money to serve the elderly, no matter how comfortable it is? But this is the task of children, they raise you young, you raise them old, in fact, they work harder than you, they have brought you up since childhood, you study, marry a wife and have children, and you are not willing to raise him for ten years?

Regardless of whether my parents' pension is given to me or not, I have to serve the elderly, so I think it has nothing to do with the pension, it is my obligation.

If you don't have money, you have to take care of your own parents!

The only child does not have this kind of trouble, the family property is mine, and the parents are also mine alone, and I never want to make a mess.

Jumping out of the crack in the stone, only to write such a title! Honoring one's parents is a legal obligation, what does it have to do with whether the parents have money or not? Even if your parents have money, it's not yours! The social atmosphere has been led astray by people like you.

An old man has a pension of 8,000 yuan per month, but his children are still unwilling to serve the elderly, probably because the elderly are sick. If the condition of the elderly is more serious, even if there is a pension of more than 8,000, the children are not willing to support it. On the Internet, I also saw some children saying that their father was very strict, and they were very afraid of their father when they were young, so they didn't have much affection for their father when they grew up.

It was found that many people were indeed short-tempered when they were young. I learned on the Internet that there is an old man in his 90s who has a pension of 8,000 yuan per month, which is already a lot. If the child is able to support the elderly, he can also get a part of the money every month.

But the old man's son said the reason why he was unwilling to serve the old man, when he was very young, his father often beat and scolded him, especially when the family was reunited, the father would always drink, and the phenomenon of beating and scolding became more and more serious after drinking. And when the mother died, the family no longer got together often, the father lived alone, and the neighbors were also offended by the father.

When the father received such a high pension, the child did not blush, and the pension paid chose to spend half of the money to send the father to a nursing home, hoping to make the father's life better. In fact, when people are old, they must hope that their children can be by their side.

Because this father is very calculating, and he has high requirements for life. Even in the nursing home, no one was able to take good care of the old man, so the problems that arose later, and the director of the nursing home was reluctant to take care of his father. I still hope that everyone can take care of their father, after all, this is their biological father, even if the father is very strict with himself, but he also raised us.

It may be that the elderly are irresponsible to the family and did not pay their attention and energy to take care of them when they were young, so they show an unsatisfactory attitude towards this, coupled with the poor physical ability and self-care ability of the elderly, some diseases may appear, which has a lot to do with the elderly in their education.

It is because in the process of taking care of the elderly, it may affect their normal life, and it may affect the normal operation of the small family.

Because their children are already busy enough at work, they don't want to take out their entertainment time to take care of the elderly, which is really ruthless.

This is absolutely true, most elderly people are now willing to give most of their pension money to their children, and only keep a small part for themselves. When people are old, everything is not very convenient, that is, no matter how much money you have, you may not be satisfied with using it yourself, even if you ask someone to take care of yourself, the purpose of others is also to get your money, how can you have children more assured and caring.

Now the vast majority of the elderly pension is borne by the children, it can be said that the children are not running for the property of their parents, except for a very small number of ill-intentioned people, everyone is for you to raise me to grow up, I share the purpose of your pension.

Some elderly people have more concerns, afraid that their children will cheat the pension money and don't care about themselves, this idea has a certain truth, as the saying goes, the upper beam is not right and the lower beam is crooked.

People who are afraid that their children will embezzle their pension money, how do you educate your children, and how do you treat your parents, the reason why you have such an idea is because of the upward and downward effects, karma!

It can be said that a family with good children, the parents' pension money is given to their children, and they may not want it, they will remember what you said to them at the beginning, don't fight at home, it's your ability to fight outside.

All the old people in a happy family are very open-minded, they will not worry about their children not supporting themselves, they will leave a little money, the rest will be handed over to their children to make overall arrangements, this is the family and everything is prosperous.

For the old man who is too selfish, he is afraid that his children will not support him and cover the pension money to death, he closes his heart, and the children can't go into his heart.

If the elderly want to live a happy old age, the key lies in their own cultivation of their children, your pension money can not buy family affection and filial piety, reasonable children, better than anything else. What should never be handed over to your children for the elderly, which may have a negative impact on the contemporary pension and is not worth publicizing.

I think it's reasonable, because I think it's better for the elderly to keep some money around them, which is more secure, because you don't know what kind of people your children are.

Of course, it is reasonable, because when the elderly are old, they have no labor force and can only rely on their own pension money, and if they give this money to their children, they will feel particularly difficult when they want to use it.

It is very reasonable, because the old man has to save some money in his own hands, so that he can buy some things, and it is better to keep them in his own hands.

Summary. Hello dear! The following answers to your question "The elderly have a pension, but the nanny fee must be borne by the children":

The elderly have a pension, but they have to pay for the babysitter. In fact, regardless of whether the elderly have a pension or not, the support of children is a legal parent.

The elderly have a pension, but the children must pay for the babysitter.

Hello dear! The following answer to the question asked by Senbi [The elderly have a pension, but the children must bear the nanny fee]: The old man has a pension in this family, but the children must bear the nanny fee.

In fact, regardless of whether the elderly have a pension or not, the support of children is a legal parent.

The most selfless love in the world is the love given by parents, so as children, we must honor our parents, because parents are very willing to pay for their children, no matter what their children need, parents will try their best to meet, so when parents reach their old age, children must not let their parents down, no matter how to repay them, so that they are a qualified child. Every parent loves their children very much, and what they do will not harm their children, but will only help their children, so I hope that children must understand their parents' good intentions, and also repay them well, and don't let them be sad, so that the old man Chunqiao can spend his old age with peace of mind.

You don't have to give it to your children, everyone is an independent individual, you can control your own money, and you can take the pension money by yourself and be less bound by your children and more free.

In family life, who doesn't want to be filial to their mothers and children, but it often backfires, and many parents have to take out pension money to help their children when they are old.

The pressure of life brought about by high prices has made modern people work diligently every day to support their families, and there has even been a phenomenon of two generations supporting a house and a baby.

Xiao Chen entered the marriage with his girlfriend in his early 30s, and the biggest obstacle was the marriage room.

The family is a rural child, and it is not easy to buy a city house.

Xiao Chen has worked in the industrial park for ten years, and he has just saved enough for a down payment, but he still has a little bit to go to the house, which has not included the decoration, and the monthly payment exceeds his salary, but the years are not forgiving, and he is very anxious when he sees that he has passed the age of 30.

These things are all in the eyes of Xiao Chen's father, and he also understands that his son is filial, and he has never opened his mouth to his parents, and he doesn't want his parents to work for him anymore.

But pity the hearts of parents all over the world, Xiao Chen's father took out all his savings for many years and the pension insurance he bought in his early years, handed them over to Xiao Chen, and promised Xiao Chen that he could help Xiao Chen every month to repay the monthly payment.

Regardless of whether Xiao Chen's parents complain in their hearts, but as parents, taking care of children is a lifelong job.

2.Parents should leave a way out for themselves.

But since his retirement, the three daughters-in-law have been in trouble because of their pension distribution.

Uncle Zhang is an employee of a state-owned enterprise, with a pension of about 10,000 yuan, and the three children all think that Uncle Zhang can't use so much money, so it is better to distribute it from now on.

In fact, Uncle Zhang has his own arrangements, in addition to leaving enough living expenses with his wife, the rest wants to be used as tuition fees for his three grandchildren, on the one hand, he can reduce the financial pressure of the children, and on the other hand, he wants to maintain contact with the children through this form.

In the end, Uncle Zhang divided the pension into three parts in order for the families of several children to coexist peacefully, and then the three sons shared the living expenses of Uncle Zhang's two sons every month.

Uncle Zhang's later life can be imagined, and the father's love that does not ask for anything in return is exchanged for the child's endless demand.

Written at the end: If the elderly don't give the pension money to their children, is it really just to prevent old age?

The lack of education for women is the root cause of this contradiction, in this context, do the elderly really have the ability to keep the money for the elderly?