For these two referee misjudgments, let s talk about my views.

England's misjudgment is the impact of human reaction limits on the game situation...

That ball if it counts. Then the morale and performance of the two teams will have different effects. It is precisely because of this influence that fans of different forces will have different opinions about the misjudgment of England.

As a neutral fan, it is precisely because football is full of this fickleness that it highlights its beauty.

Mexico's miscalculation was inferior to England's in all respects and in terms of impact.

These two misjudgments have made FIFA prepare to install a "hawkeye" similar device at the goal line to reduce the referee's misjudgment, which could be an upgrade for football!

It doesn't mean that the referee is biased, but it would be nice if it was like basketball.

England had a bad position on the linesman, so it was misjudged, and it had little to do with the referee, and the linesman was not very deliberate. It was clearly a black whistle in Mexico, as the referee refused to change the decision after a replay on the spot, and there was a lot of deliberate human invention.

I like England and Germany, so I'm just expressing my opinion. In my personal opinion, England's style of play is chaotic and lacking in morale, and even if they equalize, Germany will still have the lion's share of the win – and of course England will not necessarily lose. Mexico's previous offense and defense were okay, and then the collapse was obviously affected by the offside goal, just look at the first yellow card and the second goal conceded, so it is obvious that Mexico is more wronged.

What else to say ? Harm others and yourself.

There is darkness in society everywhere...

In the basketball ruler Sakura Tomb game.

Reversal is allowed, but not all penalties will be reversed, only the following: 1, no penalty is awarded.

2. Awarded the penalty kick that Bu Songxiang deserves.

3. Players who should not make free throws are allowed to take free throws.

4. Incorrectly awarded a score or cancelled a score.

However, according to your question, the misjudgment was discovered after the game, so the result of the game could not be changed, but the corresponding responsible person, such as the referee on duty, the recorder.

etc., will be punished.

The referee's misjudgment cannot be changed, that is, what was judged at the time was what it was, and the most that was done afterwards was clarification, apology, punishment, etc., how to say it In fact, it should be judged according to the actual situation in the game Now FIFA also has a referee association.

Generally speaking, the referee does not need to give an explanation to the outside world when making a decision, he only needs to give a written report of all the decisions made in the game at the end of each match.

In addition, this report is also not leaked Brother Huai Brother FIFA is often forced by the pressure of the outside world, such as **, to make a judgment on the referee on duty and give a certain amount of punishment, and the amount will not be very much. It will only reduce the number of appearances in future big matches (this is called a big penalty). Because I don't have the opportunity to continue my career!

For example, the referee who refereed the 1 8 finals between Italy and South Korea in '02 is said to have not appeared in international competitions again.

In fact, now that electronic monitoring has been perfected, soccer matches are forced by a concept and humanitarian problems and are reluctant to use electronic referees. Therefore, the weight of the referee or the referee as the 13th man (12 for the bishop) on the football field will still not be reduced. However, like the referee who officiated in the match between Portugal and England a few days ago, he said before the game that he expressed his support for Portugal, which I really rarely heard, which only shows that the referee is too stupid.

I guess it's going to be a few trips.