How to do four debates, how to do four debates in a debate tournament How to do four debates in a de

To the pure ostrich Lu foundation.

The free debate session is also an opportunity for the four debates to be brought into play, but it is generally placed in the first half, and when the time for the summary of the four debates is approaching, it is time to prepare to speak.

In general, no matter which position you have, you must first clarify your own thinking, have a framework, and then pay attention to the opportunity to focus on the scene, and the most important thing is to rely on the usual accumulation.

Recommended answer 2: I am to write down the opponent's arguments when the opponent is in the first debate, and then form a system in the brain, use your own framework and arguments to refute, and then lead the opponent to your own battlefield when you are free to argue, which is what you prepare in the fourth debate draft, when summarizing, refute the opponent's framework, pick out their most fundamental mistakes, refute with their own framework, consolidate their own views while refutating, and at the end, break the opponent's framework and argument, and use it to improve their own theme, that is, sublimation, such a system, it is easy to express, and as far as the four debates are concerned, it is also a more rigorous four debates, when it comes to the four debates, it is a flow chart that roughly notes an argument, often argues in the mirror, and it can be easily argued on the field, and don't bring the manuscript when you go on the field, according to the above way, it is easy to give people a feeling of full presence, in fact, you are only semi-present.

Can't get things done the first time :

I am to write down the opponent's arguments when the opponent is a debate, and then form a system in the brain, refute with your own framework and arguments, and then lead the opponent to your own battlefield when you are free to argue, which is what you prepare for the fourth debate, when summarizing, refute the opponent's framework, pick out their most fundamental mistakes, refute with their own framework, consolidate their own views while refuting, and at the end, break the opponent's framework and argument, and use it to improve their own theme, that is, sublimationWhen it comes to the four debates, it is a flow chart that roughly notes an argument, often argues in the mirror, and it is easy to argue on the field, and don't bring the manuscript when you go on the field, according to the above way, it is easy to give people a feeling of full presence, in fact, you are only semi-present. Then read more philosophical books in ordinary words, so that you can easily find the loopholes in what the other party said, in fact, to put it bluntly, debate is sophistry to sophistry, only clear thinking and sufficient accumulation will quickly find the loopholes in the other party's argument].

It can never be done. Because there is no self-confidence. Not being able to do things well the first time: Everyone is the first time, and if you are given a chance to do things well, the pressure will increase dramatically, and some people will even develop a sense of fear. On the contrary, it is counterproductive. ]

The task of the four debates is to end, summarize, and fill in the gaps.

The four debates are to clean up the battlefield. Specifically, there are three main tasks: what are the wounded on the other side, quickly pounce on them and stab them to death; Which of his brothers were injured, and he quickly brought them back to save them; Grab all the loot and put up the flag.

As the last spokesperson of the team, Si Wei is responsible for the important work of sweeping the tail for the whole team. If you don't have the initiative in the game, then the closing arguments of the four debates will be your last chance.

A good fourth debater will not think about the previous defeat, and will seize every second in the last time to score for his side. At this time, a calm, concise, and powerful speech may even impress the judges and turn defeat into victory.

Format of the four arguments in the debate competition:

1. Comprehensively analyze and discuss the debate topic with other contestants to understand the views of other debaters.

2. All debaters formulate an overall defense strategy according to the debate topic and discussion, and each person is responsible for one or several key issues.

3. On the premise of taking into account the overall situation, the four debates should take into account their own viewpoints and sublimate them at the same time.

4. The summary statement of the four debates can be written in advance according to the situation of the debate topic before the competition, but in the competition, it should be modified according to the actual debate situation of the opponent, and strive to achieve that in the final statement: not only take into account and reiterate the views of the other side, but also make up for the opponent's attack on the other side in the process of re-debate, and at the same time can also play a role in attacking the opponent's weaknesses and revealing the opponent's defects again.

Get ready in all directions! The four arguments of the square are very critical, and you rush forward at the critical moment!

It is necessary to connect the previous and the next, undertake the content of the three debates, and lay the foundation for the four debates.

1 (blank press) some of the four debates stand up and pause for a few seconds, and the same thing is that I have seen a debater, every time he stands up, he seems to be very casual about the collar of his suit, and clears his throat without a trace, coupled with his relatively pressed body shape and mature face that is slightly vicissitudes, it feels like the children have finished speaking, and the leader is going to make the final criticism.

2 (Hanging appetite contrast) There is a conclusion in our school, I have been studying professional cross talk for more than ten years, and as soon as he finished the debate, everyone laughed and ......At this time, the debater on the other side stood up and said, "The other party's conclusion just now reminded me of Huang Zhizhong's ......So I succeeded in gathering everyone's laughter. (Using the previous debate and Uncle Huang Zhizhong's completely different style, make an unrelated association, plus most of the audience are debaters, successfully attract attention and arouse everyone's appetite) But it is not always suitable to say this sentence, it is very important for different audience groups, it is this "contrast of hanging appetite" can be used as a reference as a second debate I think, the fourth debate must be discussed with the one, two, three debates before the game, and a brief summary of the one, two, three debates will be put forward in the arena, At the same time, think about what problems the other party will have that is unfavorable to you, discuss the countermeasures with the one, two, and three debates, and re-propose the countermeasures at the conclusion of the debate competition. I feel that you should be the opponent of your debate, and it is not bad to be the opponent.

What needs to be done in the four debates in the debate competition is based on the three aspects of understanding, selection, and response, as follows:

1. Understanding. In the debate competition, the four debates should be based on the opponent's argument and the opponent's standards, fully understand the attack and defense points, and judge from a macro perspective.

2. Select. The four debates should have a big picture, according to what is the most threatening on the field, what is the solution argument that the judges want to hear, and the offensive and defensive games, and then choose the corresponding debate.

3. Response. In order to be convincing enough to solve the problem, it is necessary to make adequate preparations for the offensive and defensive predictions in advance.

As the last spokesperson of the team, in addition to remembering the points of the game between the two teams, we must also remember the loopholes of the other party, when the opponent tampered with their own speeches, and after sorting them out, they should be put forward in the summary statement, and the time of the summary statement should be arranged properly, as concise and clear as possible, and the points with bigger problems should be selected to "hit" the other party.

1. The scope of influence of the arguments of the four arguments is relatively small, but it is also due to the time gap, and any of your remarks will not be refuted by the opponent.

2. The four debates are the team's final image project, part of the task is to make the team stand on the commanding heights, and the other part of the task is to pour dirty water on the opponent. Remember, a debate is a competition, not a debate on the truth, and the real debate for the truth is a moderator who defines specific practical issues, not this kind of free debate where time is tight. Therefore, the format and proposition undoubtedly encourage players to use various techniques, including discrediting their opponents.

3. Rendering enhances the atmosphere, and sublimation requires atmosphere. The biggest thing in the four debates is time, and the most important significance of rendering is to let the audience be driven by emotions to a certain extent in the mixed feeling of reason and emotion. We can say something vague and unrealistic, but people expect it, empty means beautiful, unrealistic because time constraints cannot be refuted, and the expectation of Sun is to close the identity and moral or other commanding heights of others.

But pay attention to the degree, not too much.