Does love belong to the superstructure? In love, is it still applicable that the economic base deter

Of course not.

When did love get involved with the superstructure? Is it because they all need an economic base to sustain themselves?

If you simply talk about love, then it has nothing to do with the economy, love is actually very simple, from the other party itself contains some characteristics, take love at first sight as an example (although the probability of occurrence is very small, but it is a classic of love), it may be because of a certain expression of the other party, or a certain action.

At this time, love will not happen because of whether the other party has three bedrooms and two living rooms, or whether they have a BMW.

However, the relationship between love and bread from the past to the present, there is an unclear relationship, in the old hungry era, if you have bread, then the other party is just hungry, at this time, love may arise from bread, however, at this time, it is not clear whether the bread is working, or the other party's behavior to the bread has an effect.

In today's world, materialism is rampant, people can't have the possibility of being hungry, but there is a desire to wear good clothes and drive a good car, so someone can provide such conditions, and love is also very likely to happen at this time, but at this time, it is not clear whether love is produced in the other party, or in the car or house provided by the other party.

Therefore, if you want to ask what is the basis of love, then you have to ask what basis you need to produce love, everyone is different.

Superstructure refers to the sum of social ideologies and corresponding political and legal systems, organizations, and facilities built on a certain economic basis.

The superstructure includes both the political superstructure and the ideological superstructure.

So theoretically, love can't be considered a superstructure.

Love definitely belongs to the superstructure.

Any love is built on an economic basis, and this economic foundation naturally has many differences - poverty, food and clothing, wealth...

Love is an ideological concept - different people pursue it differently.

The economic base determines the superstructure, and while it is very realistic, it is true

Love is a must-have decoration equipment for buildings.

What is the specific view of love? I don't know.

Love and economics say that the connection is very subtle.

It's a bit hard to tell. (Love is unspeakable, and if you say it, you will be wrong.) Go with the feeling.

If you can't eat and clothe now, then are you in the mood to find love, love is very realistic, and it needs material foundation, I know that many people will scold me for replying like this, but the advice is against the ear, hehe, consider it.

Economic foundation, it is impossible for you and your lover to go shopping without spending money, and it is impossible for you and your lover to live without spending money, so love needs an economic foundation.

Look at spiritual issues from a material perspective. It was originally a mistake.

I think that the economic base can determine the superstructure of love, why? In love or marriage, people often quarrel or even break up for a variety of reasons, which may be a series of reasons such as economic conflicts, a third party interfering in the relationship between the two people, and a series of reasons such as personality incompatibility. Economic conflicts account for the vast majority of these cases, which may lead to other reasons that accelerate the breakdown of the relationship between men and women.

The reality is like this, without a material foundation, there is no strong love.

I once saw a case where the husband and wife were not married, in college, the relationship was very good, often went out to play, after graduation, the two got married for a few years, because of the economic crisis, the husband lost his job, and the family's economic situation suddenly entered a crisis, and he couldn't make ends meet. The husband blames himself for this, and he wants to help his wife, but he doesn't know how to do it, and at the same time, there are some unheard voices from the neighborhood behind his back, which can be said to be under huge pressure. In order to improve the economic situation, the husband went to gambling, at first won a few games, which made him more and more addicted to gambling, and then began to lose money, but because he was unwilling, he continued to gamble, and the family's economic situation was even more dilapidated, so the wife quarreled with her husband, and the man gradually became irritable and suspicious, suspicious that his wife had other people outside, and the conflict was further intensified, and finally the marriage of the couple came to an end.

In fact, there is something more direct than this, the man or the woman's family goes bankrupt, and the other half immediately chooses to break up, and from then on become a passerby.

In love, a happy love is indispensable to the economic foundation, and without it, there will be a lack of security and comfort. After all, everyone wants to pursue a safe and comfortable life. Of course, there are lovers who break up for other reasons, but this is a rare occurrence.

In fact, except for the intervention of a third party, the rest of the relationship between men and women can be repaired, and even remarriage is possible.

Anyone who has seen your childhood knows that the sentence in your face is very classic, and love without material is a plate of loose sand, I think this sentence is right to say to you. Because everything is not absolute, does the economic base determine the superstructure in love? In fact, the economic foundation is the fundamental dignity that determines a person's life in the current society.

But you must know that feelings and money cannot be compared, I believe that every woman has the determination to share the ups and downs with you, and in the end they will eventually give up because they don't know it. So in love, sometimes we are not defeated by materiality. But she was defeated by heartache, if there was no substance, if she was a gold worshipper, maybe she would have left you in the morning.

You don't have to wait that long. The reason why it leaves you completely. It's because of some of your actions that make him a real companion.

Material things can indeed determine part of the relationship, especially after marriage, if you don't have a house, will your life be happy, if you accumulate unpleasant emotions all day long, over time you will quarrel because of this, if you use a little thing and have a dispute, because of the lack of money and some unnecessary conflicts, we will attribute this matter to us because we have no money, even if there is no money is only one aspect, the most important aspect is that you can't make the other party's heart ache.