Do you think it s really remarkable to have a high degree of education?

I think it's amazing, and it's also a skill to be able to study all the way to a high degree, so I feel that I can't stand such a boring study life. But if people with high academic qualifications think that they are great, then there is a problem, after all, high education only means that the ability to learn is high, and it cannot reflect anything else, and character is still very important.

It is indeed remarkable, a high degree of education means that they have endured hardship, or have suffered more than you, such people have their own standards in terms of dealing with the world, and they will think more thoroughly than you, which is inevitable, so a high degree is destined to be higher than you.

I think it's really remarkable that I have a high degree of education. Because of too high a degree of education, after all, only a few people have a degree like a doctorate. A high degree of education means that the person's IQ is high, which means that the person has no obstacle to learning anything, and he is a scholar at any stage.

Such talents are very welcome by any institution. So it's easy to find a job. No matter what kind of research work he does, it will produce results.

Isn't that a great person?

I don't think it's that a high degree is great, but that the process of others getting a high degree is amazing and worthy of admiration. Learning can be boring sometimes, but it's really amazing to be able to stick with it and succeed.

I think that the higher the education, the more amazing it will definitely be, because the higher the education, the higher the IQ, and it will definitely be easy to be worshipped.

Although it can't be said that a high degree of education can represent how a person is, but a high degree is a good thing after all, a high degree of education proves that the learning ability is strong, and can persevere in learning, with patience, these are valuable qualities, but if the education is used as the only criterion for judging a person, this is obviously a one-sided high education, but there are many people who are morally corrupt and live a messy life.

It is not that a high degree of education is great, but that a high degree of education is generally of high quality, good character, and strong ability, and many people with low education do not even have the most basic quality and education.

Not necessarily, because only those who are gentle and polite in their manners will make me feel great, and I only feel disgusted with those who are of low quality or who are spoiled by their parents, imbeciles, or even more arrogant and look down on people.

I think it's really amazing, there is a specialization in the art industry, which shows that people really have their own attainments in learning. I have also read books myself, and I know that reading is not an easy thing, especially people who can always insist on reading and use a high degree of education, I really think that this kind of person is very powerful, and I admire it in my heart.

It's really amazing, I suffered the loss of no education, obviously strong, but because I don't have a degree, the leader doesn't consider my appreciation and salary increase, so I have the conditions to improve my education, and I must redouble my efforts.

High education is not high ability, now there are more people with high education, good looks and good family background, this is not a great thing, if you really feel great because of this, it can only show that you are short-sighted.

I don't think that a high degree is absolutely amazing.

Because you also need to prove your own abilities in life, adapting to real life, is more important. Therefore, academic qualifications can only be one aspect, not even more important.

What are the awesome criteria?

I think how great a person is, not by his academic qualifications, but by his contribution to society, do you say yes.

If a highly educated returnee has done something that violates morality or even the law, then what is so great about him, and is there anything else worth looking at?

In fact, it's not that high education looks down on low education, it's just that the cognition of high education and low education is different, so they think differently on some things, which causes disagreement, giving people the feeling that high education looks down on low education.

Because common sense is that a high degree of education is matched by a high salary, a high salary, and it is easy to be employed.

Because he feels that his high education is his hard work, and the low education does not have his experience, this is human nature, a proud mentality, but some jobs or things are indeed better than those with low education, but not all.

A high degree can look down on a low degree, but a degree is not a culture.

With a high degree of education, we feel that we have superiority and feel superior, in fact, we should keep a low profile, and it is not necessary to be surpassed by others in the future.

Some people feel that they are amazing when they have a high degree of education. The most important thing to be a person is character.

People with high educational qualifications usually have a richer material life and spiritual world, and they receive much more ideological education than those with low educational backgrounds.

That's human nature. It's the same as the rich who look down on the poor.

It may be because people with high education are more educated, so they are more arrogant, and people in the crypt are educated, and there will always be a little less than those with high education, but not all people with high education look down on those with low education.

Now the social selection standards are actually constantly adjusting and changing, the influencing factors of academic qualifications are gradually declining, and the trend of diversified standards is rising, that is, it is difficult to find one or several key indicators, but it is undeniable that academic qualifications are still the threshold line of rotten oak. Because if there is no such threshold, then the recruiter will not be able to control the number of people fairly. But after working, when promoted, it is also helpful, the size of its role depends on the leader's understanding or experience of academic qualifications, if the leader is a doctorate, then it is easy to do, and the doctorate must be high in his weight.

On the contrary, it is relatively low. So it can't be generalized. People with the same experience are more likely to be recognized and appreciated, and people with the same background are more likely to understand each other.

Employing standards, from scores, age, education, and background, these relatively clear things to abstract things such as ability, quality, and emotional intelligence actually change, but it is undeniable that the clearer the standard, the easier it is to be fair, and the more abstract things are, the easier it is to be used.

Everyone knows that academic qualifications are not only helpful in themselves, but the resources of teachers and classmates hidden behind can sometimes play a huge role. This point must not be underestimated, maybe you think that this is a matter of our understanding, then I will give you an example, you will definitely understand more deeply and thoroughly. In the cross talk world, famous teachers are extremely influential, many actors are not famous, not because of their ability, but because they have no chance, why some can do it, the key is that one teacher is not good, so worship the second one, some big famous teachers do not accept other people's apprentices, but many teachers are not famous, so those who are smart will apprentice, a few more teachers, and there is not much cost, but they can bring themselves a lot of unexpected resources.

Of course, it is enough for a famous teacher to meet one, and a teacher to meet one. It is really not easy to meet good Bole and famous teachers. Be sure to cherish it.

Academic qualifications will definitely affect the search for a job, and this effect does not mean that you can't find it, but that it will be more difficult and the road will be narrower. For example, it affects the type of work and the salary.

Some jobs themselves have academic requirements, although academic qualifications do not represent ability, but employers can be the most direct to the academic qualifications, may not regard academic qualifications as the only standard, but must be because of academic qualifications to filter out some people.

Academic qualifications are a threshold and a stepping stone. With a higher degree of education, Duan will be more scored, but the reality will also depend on the individual's ability. Education doesn't mean everything, but if the education can be higher, then a little higher, at least a higher education is not a bad thing, right?

And for the recruiter, recruitment has a time cost. In terms of probability, the proportion of outstanding talents among those with high educational qualifications will be higher.

So you have to combine your own characteristics and the characteristics of the company you are going to to find a way to prove that you are a different person. Instead of complaining about why there must be a diploma limit. If you go to the interview, you can tell the boss, I'm sorry, although I don't have a degree, but I have high ability!

There must be certain standards for judging a certain aspect of a person. Otherwise, if you say so, the workplace will be out of action or chaotic!

And a high degree can at least show that you were once very good, you were good at learning, and you stood out when thousands of people crossed the single-plank bridge. Although having a degree does not necessarily mean that you have the ability, but there are very few people without a degree who have high ability, at least in the selection of excellent talents among the highly educated candidates, the probability of success will be much greater.

If you are looking for a job, under the same conditions, it will be easier for Hu quietly to get the favor of employing people who are just doing Zen positions. Therefore, a high degree of education is still very useful.

Essentially, as long as I like this person, then I am willing to accept the culture, and people who are lower than me fall in love.

The level of education is only one degree of universality. The level of education of your other half does not mean anything, but more importantly, it depends on the essence of this person. Many excellent people have not had a high degree of education, and there are many reasons, such as family economic problems and so on.

Moreover, the level of education can be caught up and made up for later.

If the communication is unhindered, the ideas have always been the same, what does it matter if there is so much high level of education; On the contrary, if the other party has a high level of education, but you can't communicate and communicate, then what's the use?

Of course, if you don't understand each other and have no emotional foundation, it's like choosing a mate in the form of blind dates. Then let's take a look at the other party's academic qualifications, after all, the general view is that high education also represents high personal quality. In the absence of other hardware to compare and reference, it is better to choose a higher education or equivalent than yourself, so that you can have considerable topics and ideas, and there will not be too much gap.

One person reads books every day, and the other chases soap operas every day, and it is difficult for the two to have a common language.

On the contrary, if the two themselves know each other very well, the emotional foundation is also deep. Then it doesn't matter if the level of education or whether it is a match or not. It's good to love each other, and it's good to understand each other.

Although some people are not highly educated, they are very cultivated, very emotionally intelligent, and very considerate of each other, so such people are also very attractive and must be very likable.