Do you think that education is really directly proportional to quality?

Migrant workers generally have low educational qualifications, but the quality of some people is higher than that of highly educated people, and the environment is also the determining factor, so it is slightly worse, but it is still the majority of simple ones.

Academic qualifications are just a manifestation of school grades, and they are not necessarily proportional to quality, otherwise there would be no such thing as a crime with high education and high IQ.

The two are different, most people look at it, the average quality of people with high education will be higher, but it cannot be generalized, high education is high quality.

Not at all! I have seen a group of so-called highly educated and high-quality talents, doing all the dirty and dirty things, and a disgusting paper with a sanctimonious appearance, and I still want to vomit when I think about it, it's too dirty!

Quality is related to money, people with high education have relatively more money, so the quality is naturally high, of course, I think the quality has nothing to do with morality, quality is sometimes a very superficial thing.

High education does not mean high quality, quality and family education has a close relationship, some people have a high degree of education but the quality is very low, some people have little education, but his quality is very good, but most of the quality of high education will be higher than the quality of no education.

The ratio is not high, but most of the highly educated people do have higher quality than the low education, and there are a few people with high education and low quality, which is not as good as those who have not gone to school.

Quality is inseparable from the living environment since childhood, as well as family education, even if the education is high, the habits developed since childhood, or bad problems, this is not next to the academic qualifications, no matter how high the education, there should be no quality in the place where there is no quality.

It should be that a certain degree of education is directly proportional to the basic quality, and most of the people who have not graduated from primary school have a lower quality than a high school education, but the quality of people with a high degree may not necessarily be the best.

It depends on which aspect of the quality it refers to, if it is character, it doesn't matter, but if it is a little bit related to other aspects, it is still proportional.

Personally, I think to learnCalendar and quality are not directly proportional. And the higher the education, the better the quality.

Many people will think that people with higher education will have better qualities. But in real life, this view is wrong. Because many people with relatively high educational qualifications are not as high as the quality of ordinary people. <>

Education and quality are not directly proportional.

Everyone will think that after a person has a relatively high academic qualification, the quality of the person is also directly proportional to the academic qualification. But this is wrong. Although there are many people whose education and quality are basically at the same level.

But because many people have always paid more attention to their academic performance in the process of reading. As a result, they ignore the cultivation of their own quality, resulting in even if they have a relatively high degree of education, they still cannot have a relatively high quality. <>

Higher quality education is not always better.

First of all, most people with higher education may be better than ordinary people in terms of quality. However, there will also be many people who have relatively high academic qualifications, but their qualities are not much different from ordinary people. Even some people who are not highly educated will exceed the qualities possessed by those with higher educational qualifications.

So in general, it is not that the higher the academic qualifications, the better. Because a person's academic qualifications and qualities are evaluated separately. And there is no inextricable relationship between the two.

It is hoped that every person with high education can have a relatively high quality.

Finally, I personally hope that in real life, every person with a relatively high degree of education can make himself have a relatively high quality state. Because only in this way can the people around you feel that they are better. And it will also make the people around you feel that they can improve their personal quality through learning.

Education and quality are not necessarily proportional, the higher the quality of education, the better, this still has to divide people, some people's quality is naturally low.

Not proportional. It is not that the higher the academic qualifications, the better, but some academic qualifications are very low, and they are not as good as ordinary people.

It is not proportional, and there are many people with high academic qualifications who are very poor in quality and will do a lot of bad things.

No, there is a positive correlation between academic qualifications and quality.

I think that education and quality are not proportional, high education does not mean good quality, I think the main thing is to look at the tutor, even if the education is not high-quality, it is also very good.

Although the level of quality cannot depend on the level of academic qualifications, it is still related to academic qualifications in general. After all, people with high academic qualifications, what they experience is still different, because they are hereHigher educationSome of the theoretical knowledge learned, and in terms of what is cultivated in school, is much more than that of people who have not read books, just to see if they will apply it to people.

1.In fact, most of the people who come out of the higher education environment are quality people. <>

If education cannot produce some quality people, then education should not have such an important position now. After all, if education does not produce useful talents, then the country will not put education above our top priority. Nowadays, education has become something that every child must experience, because there is a lot of knowledge to be learned in school, and it can develop their personal qualities.

After more than 20 years of study, the way they have formed a way of thinking and dealing with people is still different from those who have not read books. But this is not absolute, after all, there are some people who find it difficult to change what is in their essence even through learning.

2.In fact, only through continuous learning can a person's quality and character be improved. <>

Of course, quality and character need to be acquired through learning, and of course, learning does not necessarily refer to what is learned in school, and many people learn much more in society than in school after they leave society. Because they have experienced things that they can't have in school, they look at events differently. Because they have experienced a lot, they have been treated by others with a different kind of eyes, and they will also treat those who used to be like themselves in some better ways.

After all, no one wants to see people who were once similar to themselves in the same realm as they once were. <>

Therefore, whether a person has quality or not, although it is not particularly related to academic qualifications. But in general, only after continuous learning and summarizing in the experience, will there be a better quality and a lot to do with the environment in which I grew up. If he has lived in a particularly bad environment since he was a child, then his attitude towards others is also very different, so if you want to have a very good quality and character, you still need to have a good educational environment.

Of course, there is a little bit of a relationship, if the quality is very low, most of them are people with no academic qualifications, and many people with higher academic qualifications also know that they can't perform such a quality.

I don't think the level of quality has anything to do with the level of education. But I think it has a lot to do with a person's family environment.

Because of the backwardness and failure of education, studies are often linked to family conditions, and learning resources are obtained with money status, and bad money eliminates good money, and many kind and introverted students will be stepped on by others, and Marxism-Leninism is compulsory in school, so a large number of so-called good students without independent personality and thought have been cultivated, and Marxism-Leninism and traditional culture are completely incompatible, so the children of traditional families generally can't go to school, and students who are indifferent to fame and fortune and have no quarrel with the world generally don't like to study. This is also a tragedy caused by the ideology of the state, Marxism-Leninism can only be said to be refined egoists, people with low academic qualifications still have conscience and integrity, and people with high academic qualifications have no courtesy, righteousness and shame. Of course, things are not absolute, but it should be said that more than ninety percent of them are like this, so the higher the education, the lower the quality.

I don't think it's a completely proportional relationship, but relatively speaking, people with high educational qualifications are generally higher than those with low educational qualifications.

I think there is no direct relationship between the level of quality and the level of education, many people have high education, but the quality is very low.

Temperament, literacy, and taste are all related to a person's experience. What kind of books you read, what kind of people you see, and what kind of people you see in the world directly determine the level of a person's overall quality.

Compared with those children who drop out of school early, college students obviously read more and see more than them in the world, don't think that college students don't read much now, in fact, chatting with classmates from all over the world can also gain a lot of knowledge.

Some people were not happy and said: Although I dropped out of school early, I also started working as a teenager, and I also met people from all over the world, and my knowledge is not low, okay.

How to put it, your knowledge can only say a lot, but you can't say that it is not low. Just like you can criticize college students: the four bodies are not diligent, and the five grains are not divided.

But it cannot be denied that in the three or four years when they have no pressure in life at all, they will definitely not be exposed to the knowledge of how difficult it is to crawl at the bottom of society.

Of course, all college students will eventually go to the society, but the starting point of having a degree is definitely different from that of not having a degree.

I believe that every boy wants to have a happier and better life, so we see that many people are very positive and very hard-working. They hope that through their own enthusiasm and hard work, they can create a happier and better life.

So we see that many people are studying hard and working hard, because they know that in this way, they can make themselves better. It is also through the continuous efforts of many people that they have finally achieved better results, and even some people have obtained higher academic qualifications.

I believe that after obtaining a higher education. They're going to work hard and do what they love or do best, and that's it. Make better use of their academic qualifications and abilities.

However, we have seen that there are many colleges and universities or very good talents, and we may have some academic qualifications, upside down. Let them hang up to some other disciplines. Or some other institutions, so some people just want to know if you think the inversion of academic qualifications is a waste of talent.

Maybe for a small number of people, they don't think that academic qualifications are upside down is a waste of talents, even if they are upside down in other schools or other majors, they don't think it's a waste of talents, because they think that since they are talents, they should try to be all-round talents. Not only should you be proficient in the knowledge related to your own field, but you should also know the knowledge in other related fields, so even if you are upside down in other academic qualifications and disciplines. It's not a waste, it's about making them learn again.

But we know that for a lot of very sophisticated people, they have what they are best at. They can do very well in a field they are familiar with, and if we turn their academic qualifications upside down and let them work in something that they are not familiar with. It is believed that it is difficult for them to make breakthroughs, and they may even do very poorly, so this is indeed a waste of talent.

Refers to the shed. So, in fact, for everyone, once they have obtained a high degree of education, then they want to be able to work in the disciplines and fields that they are familiar with as much as possible. Therefore, some people may think that this is indeed a waste of talents, because we cannot engage in the field that we are best at, but some people think that this can allow children to learn more knowledge.

But no matter what the end result is, we still hope that for different talents, we should try to give different ways and methods, because only by choosing the most suitable method, our method, so that everyone can give full play to their abilities. In the end, each of us can get better learning and progress, so that we can really play the role of talents.

In the first year of work after graduation, the salary was very low, and I felt that my academic qualifications had been trampled on, and my academic qualifications were high but the salary was not the highest.

I feel that high education and high salary are no longer equated.

Many people may still look at this issue with old ideas. Because in the past, there were indeed some units that divided the salary grade according to academic qualifications, how much was the basic salary of graduate students, how much was the basic salary of undergraduates, and how much was the basic salary of junior colleges, and there was a strict salary grading system. Even now, there are some companies that do this.

So what is it that causes this situation of dividing wages according to academic qualifications?

Lack of high education. In the past, due to the intermittent level of education and the college entrance examination system, the overall level of academic qualifications in our country was not high. In order to attract highly educated talents, many companies will naturally use the most obvious division of academic qualifications to distinguish salary grades.

At that time, it was indeed highly educated and high-salary. This is also the reason why many people who have a college student in the past will feel that their life has been settled in this life. Especially in rural areas, college students are generally labeled as "golden phoenixes", and there is a feeling of glory to their ancestors.

I remember when I was in school, after graduating from elementary school, there were a group of classmates who couldn't go to junior high school, so they went to work after graduation, and when I graduated from junior high school, another group of classmates couldn't continue to go to high school, so they also went to work. By the time I graduated from high school, a large number of my classmates could no longer continue to college. Among this large number of students, there is not a single elementary school classmate in my impression, and there are only a few junior high school students.

I remember one time very clearly, that is, when I was waiting for the bus to go to the county high school, I met a primary school classmate who asked directly, are you still studying!

They will think that you have been reading for so long and reading so high, for what, just for that high salary. Otherwise, you're a joke in their mouths. For many children, especially those in rural areas, reading is to give them more choices in life, or to make choices more relaxed.

For those who are studying, academic qualifications represent a person's educational background, professional knowledge and learning attitude, and are not naturally equated with high salaries. However, for those who do not choose to study, they may feel that a high degree without a high salary is a failure.