In the current NBA, is there really a league that intervenes in a team s win loss game?

In fact, it is normal to interfere in the game for the sake of conflict of interest.

There will definitely be conflicts of interest in all kinds of competitions, and it is normal for someone to interfere in the game for the sake of conflict of interest.

Yes. Anything can happen in a game, so you have to be very strong and strong enough to overcome these unexpected situations.

Of course there will be a game, there will be failures and successes, this is inevitable, not accidental.

Maybe it will exist, anything is possible now, interfering in the game of winning or losing, it may be in the future.

In fact, now both the NBA and the CBA will be more or less interfered with by the league, because the league considers income!

It will really happen, after all, the stadium is also very dark at times, and there is match-fixing.

This shouldn't be the case in the regular season, it's really hard to talk about in the playoffs, and there should be.

A lot of people use NBA referees to achieve what they want.

It's also normal for someone to interfere in a game for a conflict of interest.

In fact, it is normal to interfere in the game for the sake of conflict of interest.

If such interference does exist, it will definitely violate the law and will definitely be sentenced if caught. So it's not a joke for the league to interfere in the game, but there are almost no factors for this kind of intervention in the NBA today, because the league's systems in all aspects are gradually improving, and it should be unlikely that this kind of thing will happen.

After all, this is a business league, and maximizing profit is a major appeal of the NBA league, and if the trend of the game starts to deviate from that appealIt is absolutely understandable that the alliance will influence within a certain range, and of course the alliance will never admit it. However, if this kind of behavior is exposed, it will have a serious impact on the image of the entire NBA league, and will also lead to the loss of a large number of fans and market interests.

A similar situation appeared in the 15-16 season, when the Warriors were in full swing, met the Cavaliers in the Finals again, and the leading Warriors thought they would win the championship again, but the situation arose, Green was suddenly suspended, and the Cavaliers also took this opportunity to pull back a game, and since then the Cavaliers have been out of control, and the 73-win runner-up pair was also born. In this game, although the Cavaliers have the strength and their reversal is indeed epic, but if you say that the league has no control, it really can't be justifiedYou know, the victory in that series made James a god in the city of Cleveland, bringing them their first trophy.

Business alliances are all about interestsTherefore, a certain degree of operation of the game is inevitable, but the league does not dare to be too blatant, after all, this will be unfair and fair, and hurt the reputation of the league. For this, it's good to look at it yourself, watch it if you like it, don't watch it if you don't like it, and just be happy.

In today's NBA, there is no league factor that interferes with a team's victory or defeat.

If such interference exists, it is certainly a violation of the law.

A lot of people are watching the NBA now, and there won't be such an element.

In the current NBA, it is not purely a factor that interferes with the victory or defeat of a team in the league.

First of all, as a professional game, you don't deliberately lose.

There could be several reasons for this:

1. The difference in strength between the teams in the NBA league is not particularly large, there is a saying that if any NBA player is given a chance to shoot 20+ in a single game, the score will not be less;

2. For the teams at the bottom of the rankings, there is less research on tactics and players, because there are many players who may not even see each other, so everyone naturally will not pay much attention to and analyze in detail;

3. The top-ranked team will also despise the lower-ranked team in terms of mentality, but when there is a state of anxiety in the game, the mentality may be affected;

4. The weaker team is not slaughtered, and it also hopes to prove itself in front of the strong team, so it will play harder;

5. The league broadcast will have a lot of emphasis on the top teams, so the players of the weaker teams do not want to be vulnerable in front of more, and at the same time hope to play a good game and sign a better contract in the future.

It may not be accurate or comprehensive, but I hope it helps.

1. The strong team, especially the old players, will arrange them to rest appropriately. For example, the Spurs are the most obvious, and they are accumulating energy for the playoffs. The team is disciplined, the main force is not on the side, and the game is very disciplined, but it can also be lost.

2 NBA no weak team, quote. Every player in the NBA is not bad, give them a chance, and they can play at a level, such as Jeremy Lin's Lin Crazy. The weak team is only relatively speaking, the strength is not bad, and it can play a wonderful game, but there are more young people who are not disciplined, and they play very casually.

3 may be due to the schedule is too dense, such as back-to-back, etc. Strong teams will also be tired, make mistakes, etc., and make losses 4 The playoff positions are fiercely competitive Especially in the West This year, 678, the slightest carelessness will fall out of the top eight, and the teams in front of them are also fighting for home advantage in the playoffs and will not relax. Basically, they don't lose deliberately.

I think the possibility of deliberately releasing water as you mentioned is relatively small, which is related to the attendance rate of the NBA owner, if the attendance rate is not good, the team's income is not good, it directly affects the development of the team, and it is not very beneficial to the team.

Weak teams play strong teams, the NBA itself is not a very bad team, relatively speaking, the difference in strength is not very great, and there are some uncertain factors, such as someone broke out, the bench, or limited someone's play, climate, environment, etc. The disparity between the CBA teams is relatively large, and they can basically be abused.

That's a high level, even though I don't know basketball. No, I don't know it's impossible to play match-fixing, the ball game is a group event. There is a question of overall coordination and strategy.

In fact, the individual strength of the NBA is very average, and the top is often just a few people. The strength of the team has a lot to do with the chemistry of the team (that is, the cohesion we call the cohesion, the degree of run-in between the players, etc.), and it also has a lot to do with the coach's personal charm and tactical arrangement. Of course, there is still a gap in absolute strength.

There are times in the NBA when there is a lot of abuse. However, the poor teams often play unexpected games against strong teams, and they are holding their breath. The strong teams tend to be careless.

The NBA is relatively mature and has a good balance, and in order to make the game more enjoyable, most of them will not differ by many points, and sometimes the referees will also help, while the CBA is relatively young, and many places are not as good as the NBA

The U.S. Basketball League does not play match-fixing, as for the problem you mentioned, I personally think that the difference in strength between the NBA teams is not very large, and there are many factors that determine the outcome of the game on the court, such as luck, tactics, and venues.

There are no weak teams in the NBA, the strength is equal, and there is almost no difference.