EB 5 Investment Immigration Risk Analysis and Avoidance

The first is whether you can successfully get a permanent green card;

The second is whether the investment of 500,000 or 1 million US dollars can be returned to the applicant's account safely and on time.

Risk aversion can be measured from the following perspectives:

1. See whether the project has the direct capital contribution.

Many project parties will play a "background" signboard when launching an investment project, however, all investment immigration programs are approved and supported, but the United States will not provide guarantees for any project. All projects are operated by the project operating company independently and are self-financed. Therefore, whether there is a "background" is meaningless, and the key depends on "whether there is direct investment", such as whether it provides low-interest loans, interest-free development, or direct investment.

2. See whether the project has begun substantial progress.

Whether there is a project implementation plan, whether there is any upfront investment, whether the developer invests, and the proportion of investment in investment immigration applicants (generally about 30% is safer).

3. See if there are other financing methods.

In addition to the company's own capital and the investment of the immigrant applicant, the investment immigration program generally has loans, ** issuance of bonds or partial bank financing. If the project can withstand the bank's review and qualify for the loan, it can also indirectly prove that the project is low-risk.

4. See if the project is legal and whether it belongs to the EB-5 Regional Center project.

Whether or not there is a ** approval document and does not comply with the U.S. EB-5 investment immigration regulations.

5. Look at the relevant guarantee certificates.

Whether the EB-5 investor's funds are placed in the first priority for repayment, whether the developer's collateral is prioritized for repayment of the EB-5 investor's principal and dividend income, whether the EB-5 investor has a completion security agreement, etc.

6. Look at the type of investment.

Whether it is "borrowing" or "investing", generally speaking, "borrowing" is less risky than "investing".

7. Look at the reputation of the developer and the company.

EB-5 Program for U.S. Immigrant InvestorsIn the event of bankruptcy, there are three main areas to deal with. First, timely asset liquidation and debt disposal are carried out to minimize losses. Second, actively communicate and negotiate with relevant stakeholders to seek solutions and try our best to protect the rights and interests of investors.

Finally, we should summarize the lessons learned and improve risk management and due diligence to avoid similar problems from happening again. In the process of response, it is necessary to clarify responsibilities, strengthen supervision and supervision, and ensure that the legitimate rights and interests of investors are protected. In general, it is important to respond to the bankruptcy of EB-5 investment projects in a timely and effective manner to minimize losses, learn lessons from them, and improve the risk management of investment projects.

1.Reasons for the bankruptcy of an EB-5 investment project

The reasons for the bankruptcy of an EB-5 investment project can be analyzed in a number of ways. First, some EB-5 projects can go bankrupt due to poor management. The management team's expertise, experience, and knowledge of the market are all important factors in the success of a project.

Second, market risk is also one of the reasons for the bankruptcy of the EB-5 program. If the market in which the project operates is highly volatile and the return on investment does not meet expectations, it may be in trouble. In addition, policy risk is also one of the reasons for the bankruptcy of the EB-5 program.

Changes in laws and regulations may result in investors not being able to meet immigration conditions, resulting in the failure of the project. In short, for EB-5 investment projects, reasonable management, accurate judgment of market risks, and effective response to policy risks are the keys to avoiding bankruptcy.

2.Lessons and Lessons from the Bankruptcy of EB-5 Investment Projects

Dealing with the bankruptcy of an EB-5 investment project requires lessons to be learned. First, investors should conduct sufficient due diligence when selecting a project, including an assessment of the project's background, developer experience, and market conditions. Second, the terms of the contract should clearly stipulate the remedies after the bankruptcy of the project, including financial safeguards and legal proceedings.

In addition, investors should be vigilant during the investment process, regularly check the progress of the project, and maintain close communication with the developer to keep abreast of the project risks and take action. Finally, regulators should strengthen their oversight of the EB-5 program to ensure transparency and compliance to protect investors.

3.Measures to deal with the bankruptcy of EB-5 investment projects

First, investors can negotiate with creditors and project developers to explore the possibility of renegotiation or restructuring of debt. Second, investors can seek legal assistance to protect their rights and interests through litigation. In addition, investors may also consider switching to other EB-5 projects to minimize losses.

However, to avoid the recurrence of similar situations, investors need to be more careful in choosing their investment projects and carefully analyzing their commercial viability and risks to reduce the likelihood of future bankruptcies.

In 2017, another 930 If you still want to invest in EB5, please wait for the priority to be resolved and the policy will be implemented before investing.

930 lived up to expectations in 2017 again, everything has not changed, and the schedule has no intention of solving it at all, just like that, it has been postponed again. Since 2015, 930, 930, 1209, 428, 930, at least 5 times the wolf came, is this the monkey invited to tease?

I have always believed that there are still many investors who want to invest in EB-5 today, which is like a wall, the people inside are suffering from the schedule, and the people outside are in a hurry to come in.

To be fair, there are a lot of frauds in EB5, and there are many illegal speculators who have been caught by the SEC, but there are also some projects and regional centers in this industry that have done word-of-mouth, and there are many successful refund records and cases. I'm not advertising, I'm not mentioning specific names. It's just an objective and fair evaluation.

But at this juncture, the policy uncertainty is too great, if the new investor feels that 500,000 US dollars is very casual, which is equivalent to eating McDonald's, you can squander it at will, then you can invest as you like. I believe that no matter how local tyrants are, they also hope that the value of the money is spent, not just a splash and a sound, regardless of the result.

1.Possibility of queue cutting in rural and urban priority areas.

If the policy is determined to cut the queue, then you can choose projects in reliable rural and urban priority areas. But these projects are definitely riskier than cities. Which one do you vote for, after the actual adoption of the policy, whether it is allowed to cut the queue and decide whether to take this risk.

2.Shut down the regional center project.

Although everyone thinks that this is not a high probability event, there are indeed lawmakers in the United States who propose to shut down, once it is shut down, those who get on the bus will have to get down, are you willing to take this risk?

3.The backlog is not solved at all, and the visa quota remains unchanged for 10,000 years.

This possibility is the most terrifying, if the scheduling is not resolved, more and more foreigners will cut the queue in the later stage, you have to wait 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, can you wait? Even if you can wait, are you willing to bear the risk of funds and the loss of your money card caused by the schedule? When I waited for 10 or 20 years to apply for a permanent green card, I found that there was a problem with the project, the money was misappropriated, and not enough jobs were created as required, can I still have a permanent green card?

10 Anything can happen in 20 years.

4.It rose to 1.35 million.

To be honest, if it rises to 135, the industry will also die, is there still a need to invest.

There is no need for Chinese investors to fall prey to the game of interests. All roads lead to Rome, so there's no hurry.