Ask for a translation, if you can help analyze the grammar, it is also excellent, thank you, friends

I see the sparkle in your bright eyes.

That's where our dreams begin.

Nothing is impossible.

The world is right before our eyes.

We're going to be together, unstoppable.

Although there is still a long road under your feet.

A thousand miles per hour.

Free fall from the sky.

I don't want to pull away, pull open this umbrella line.

I am not afraid of death.

I just want this moment to be more cheerful.

Treat each day as if it were your last.

Because there may not be tomorrow.

Everything you dream of.

I'll give it all to you.

Leave no regrets.

Nothing is impossible.

The world is right before our eyes.

The end of the world is at hand. Hehe, it took a lot of effort.

I see intelligence in your eyes, I know this is where we started, because nothing is impossible, and there is no place in the world that cannot be reached, in order to be together, we persevere, although the road to the end is long, free falling from a thousand miles in the sky, don't think about opening the umbrella lock, I am not afraid of death, I just want to live this moment that makes people feel like showing off, before I open the umbrella lock, I make today the last day of my life, that is, to prevent tomorrow from coming, I want to give you what you dream of getting, and I know that there will be no regrets, because nothing is impossible, and there is no place in the world that cannot be reached

There lived in London a girlthere lived a girl in London is a deformation of the Baithere Be structure. Using other du verbs instead of be, the sentence zhi is more vivid. Similar:

daothere stood a man under a tree.Under the tree stood a version of the individual.

there flows a river around our city.Flowing around the city.

Right a river.

First bai

sentence, who leads the definite du

From the sentence, to the end of for six months, modify women

The second sentence zhi: The comma dao is preceded by the main clause, followed by the comma is the clause guided by the affecting non-predicate aplomodic verb, and is a coordinating conjunction, followed by an omitted (affecting) one

The third sentence, because leads the reason adverbial clause, the main clause is two simple sentences connected by and they may not consume ......and (they) are liable to experience a deficiency.

The meaning of the first sentence is that some background information is needed to understand the differences between Italian brands. A little of background is the subject, needed to understand is the predicate, what contrasting Italian brands set one another is the object clause, in the object clause contrasting Italian brands as the subject, set as the predicate.

Regarding the grammatical problems of 1 and 2, in fact, that he needed in 1 can also be placed in front of to him, and that i met yesterday in 2 can also be placed at the end of the sentence. As far as these two sentences are concerned, there is no difference because they are both relatively simple sentences. If you encounter a particularly complex sentence, the definite clause should follow the antecedent, that is, the word it modifies, otherwise it will cause ambiguity.

That christnas should be christina'S right?

If so, the sentence means:

Then you can see for yourself all the good things I've tried to tell you in Christina's window.

P.S. See for Yourself VISee for yourself (see with your own eyes) example sentence:

see for yourself: a precision mechanical device slices a flap in your cornea, see?

See for yourself: a delicate mechanical device cuts a small slice of your cornea, see?

that i've been trying to tel you about is a nod to all the nice things, to qualify these things as "I tried to tell you".

Hope it helps.

Translation: Then you can see for yourself all the good things in the windows of christna that I have been trying to tell you.

Analysis: This sentence contains a definite clause, which starts from that after windows to about, which is used as a definite clause to modify windows.

Scientists studied baleen whales living in near-surface waters, especially one of the gray whale calves, as well as free-water right whales and humpback whales in the waters of Argentina and Hawaii, and found that they apparently track underwater objects visually, apparently with good eyesight in the water and in the air.

A one-year monitoring study of baleen whale species, particularly grey whales, was carried out in close proximity underwater. The study found that free-range spine whales and humpback whales have obvious visual tracking subjects underwater in Argentina and Hawaii, and they apparently have good eyesight both underwater and at the surface.