Why, is there a person without limitations?

Definitely not, everyone has limitations, because many things in this world are originally opposed to each other, and if you have the advantage of one side, then you must lack the advantage of the other, and from the point of view of the lack of one, people have limitations.

Therefore, the most fundamental reason is not that people themselves are not good enough, but that the relationship between the surrounding environment.

No. But human beings are developing towards no limitations, but in the process of pursuing and developing, people will always have limitations, and the deadline for this goal without limits may be forever.

1.The material composition of human beings is carbohydrates, which determines that the living environment of human beings must be limited. This limitation may be surpassable in the distant future.

2.Man, the composition of wisdom is knowledge and thinking, can the knowledge of the universe be exhausted, maybe forever.

From this point of view, can one transcend one's own limitations? Of course, if there are no limitations, there is absolutely non-existent.

Feel like you're asking, "Is there a Superman?" Sorry, just talking.

But can it be understood that --- person who exists infinitely? , that is, absolutely non-existent, because people, as individuals, are limited by various objective conditions, such as "the heart has more than enough power to comply", there are often examples in life. But within the scope of the conditions, you can be proficient in everything, limit you to do addition and subtraction within 100, you are guaranteed a full score, at this time, for you, relative to this field, is not limited.

Non-existent! People are social, they must exist in certain social relations, and they belong to a certain class, and any class has its own class limitations, so people also have limitations.

No, you will be limited in society, even if you are out of society, you will be limited in survival.

It can't exist, it's easy to imagine if one doesn't have any limitations, is that possible, because everything has a boundary.

Absolutely nothing. Limitations are absolute, and freedom is relative.

Depending on how you look at it, limitations are relative, but I personally think there are none, so how can people not be limited.

From a phenomenological point of view, man is both finite and infinite.

But each person has limitations for himself, of course.

But the infinity of human beings is also a manifestation of limitations.

If a person has no limitations, he is no longer a man, but a god.

No, no one is perfect.

No is absolute.

To say that there is is also relative.

Nothing in the world is absolute!

In a person's opinion, whether there is or is not depends on what you think?

There is no certainty!

Whoever says it is not necessarily right.

No, you can do whatever your mind wants, but what about your body?

You know what everyone knows.

Well, it's relative, it's absolute.

Dude, haven't heard of it"The Tao is very good, and it is very good"Is it? As long as things exist, nothing can be without limitations.

Even top! The theory of relativity! People are not limited! Look at your own limitations.

People's thinking consciousness has certain limitations. Limited to the environment and practical experience, the understanding is not high, and it is difficult to break through.

Human understanding is the product of the combination of learning and practical experience. If there is not enough knowledge and practical experience, it is difficult to improve people's understanding.

Human society is complex and changeable, and people's understanding is not high, and it is difficult to cope with the rapidly changing situation. The core issue of society is embodied in the return of public and private interests to society.

The moral and material interests of society are attributed to the public as the foundation of society, and the attribution of private individuals is the goal pursued by individuals or small groups.

Selfishness is the main source of people's limitations, and they don't want to do things that harm their own interests. If you have interests and can't do what you can't do, you can't do it. Things that are both beneficial and harmful to oneself, do not do what you want to do, want to do it in your heart, and do it with trepidation.

Normal social people cannot do things that violate national laws and rules, social moral norms, industry regulations and systems, and humanistic common sense. You can't do things that hurt yourself, others, or the public.

People are also bound by certain limitations of the natural environment, social environment, living environment, and personal conditions. There are some limitations and constraints that are normal and reasonable, and cannot be broken through.

Some limitations and constraints can be gradually revised and changed through the collective efforts of the public. It makes it more convenient for human survival and life, and human society is more scientific and progressive.

Some of the shackles of decadent and backward stereotypes must be broken and eliminated with one mind. Break free from the shackles of the ban, feel comfortable and do what you should do with confidence.

People live in society and are subject to many limitations. How to shake off the shackles of limitations is to constantly strive to eliminate the constraints and shackles that should not exist at present, to free some of the shackles of confinement, to boldly reform and innovate, and to open up a new social situation.

Only by studying new knowledge, enhancing our awareness of scientific and advanced thinking, resolutely fighting against decadent and backward outdated laws, and creating new standards of social behavior. Only by abiding by the duties that you should pursue can you make people feel comfortable, speak their minds freely, and throw off their arms without scruples to do what they should do.

August 9, 2020.

I'm often stuck in relationships, and the idea that other people's actions make me feel hurt limits my thinking space.

I found the answer in a book I recently finished reading, "The Shackles of Human Nature":

Everyone has limitations, and the reason why he does this is due to his experience, his family, and other reasons, and everyone has a different experience, so they will behave differently.

Angering others for doing this is just a meaningless act.

I often feel that a friend who is often with me is too arrogant, disrespectful, and selfish, but I don't like disputes, so I don't stir up trouble.

But recently, I gradually feel that the reason why she has such a character is because she has no mother since she was a child, and she has less compassion that maternal love can teach her, she grew up with her father, and her father is such a character, and it also affects her a little bit, so it is difficult for her to empathize with other people's feelings, which is also something she can't do.

So why be unhappy because of someone else's limitations? They may not realize that it is bad to do so.

Last night, my boyfriend told me that he met a troll while playing a game, and he was very angry and wanted to spray him with him.

I told him that in this person's eyes, only by scolding others can he feel a little better, he actually has no way to deal with his emotions and time normally, he does not have the most basic control ability, and he is not aware of this when he scolds him.

So isn't it pitiful for such trolls? Scolding him is like playing the harp to a cow, wasting your time.

Focus more on yourself and worry less about other people's affairs.

Human limitations: the limitations of space, time, self-structure, methods of understanding, etc., all these limitations let us know that what we know is just a drop in the ocean for the whole universe, too small. So we follow our true understanding:

We are ignorant and ignorant compared to what we do not know. The more we learn about the world, the deeper we will discover our ignorance. Science can explore and discover the mysteries of the universe, it can discover what the world looks like, but science cannot explain why the world is the way it is.

Therefore, we must have a correct understanding of science, which cannot explain all the mysteries of human beings, but can only explore how the world is, but cannot explain why the world is.