Having defeated India, it is true that it does not want its own territory, and if it is said that it

It seems that the landlord is still childish. If you say that any place is your own, everyone wants to do so, then the whole world should not be a pot of porridge every day. For example, India thinks that Aksai Chin is his, does it want to fight to the death with China?

Japan considers the Diaoyu Islands to be its own, Vietnam to consider the Paracels to be his, China to consider Vladivostok to be its own, and the Russian Far East to be its own .........You first understand what is controversial and what is indisputable in order to understand the strategic decision at that time.

When there is a dispute, you have an absolute advantage in strength, then you can take more, the two sides are about the same, according to the equal consultation, each takes the most useful for itself China and India belong to the latter situation. Southern Tibet is very important for India's national defense and security, and Aksai Chin is very important to China, so the status quo is that we occupy the disputed area in the west and India occupies the disputed area in the east.

Material scarcity with the policy of preferential treatment of prisoners inverted The Indians, knowing that our army was too merciful, deliberately surrendered en masse.

Why did India refuse the corresponding medical supplies provided by the United Nations, because stubbornness is as simple as that, anyway, judging from the information it has received from all sidesThe United Nations has provided some of the supplies, but it is a drop in the bucket for India, which has nearly 500 million people now infected. <>

The infected population in India has almost reached 1 3 of the total population, and half of the infected population is not able to withstand ordinary medical supplies at all, and there has been a shortage of oxygen in various parts of India, not to mention ventilators and the like, these auxiliary equipment are not enough oxygen, do you think ventilators can? Even a private hospital in New Delhi, the capital of India, died of 20 critically ill patients due to lack of oxygen, which means that it can still hold on for a period of time when there is oxygen, but because of insufficient oxygenAnd now the oxygen in India has reached the level of the salary of an ordinary Indian working for half a year. <>

Now it is still so stubborn, refusing the materials provided by the United Nations, rejecting the materials provided by China, why? Because he knows that there is no way to return to heaven, the infection of nearly 500 million people, how many medical supplies do you think can be sustained, so now these rich class leaders in India have gradually given up, of course, you can't say that on the surface, but you choose to flee India from the rich people in India, you know that the domestic environment is definitely not good, it is almost a purgatory on earth, because the rich man can choose to run,Ordinary people who don't have money have no choice but to suffer in this land. <>

And India is now a bit similar to the previous UK, it seems to be engaging in herd immunity, what does herd immunity mean? It means that let the virus spread wantonly, and see who can survive in the end, and those who can survive will not have the ability to resist the virus? Then what do you think about the price of this, how many people will have to be killed and injured to achieve such an effect, and it is very likely that a super virus will be generated, and the countries around India will be affected, and places like Nepal and Bangladesh will almost not be able to runTherefore, we must now strengthen the control of the border, and import internal defense from the outside.

He thinks he has what it takes to solve it. Unfortunately, India is too blindly confident in its own capabilities, and the situation is now out of control.

They just don't like to be helped, and India thinks that they are very powerful and don't need others to do anything to them. That's what it is, it's a special difference.

Ring. Ball. 2018-08-24** Road.

More than 400 people have died and many villages have been completely wiped out by the once-in-a-century floods in the southern Indian state of Kerala. In the face of such a catastrophe, the UAE has offered huge amounts of aid to help repair and rebuild, and India** has reacted unusually: "Thank you, but you don't need it." ”

This unusual statement has attracted a lot of attention from the outside world. The New York Times said that some analysts, while applauding Modi's quick rescue operation, believe that its rescue efforts may not be sufficient. In addition, some analysts said that India's insistence on not accepting foreign aid may be related to "self-esteem".

According to the New York Times on August 23, the United Arab Emirates has offered $100 million in aid for reconstruction in the face of the catastrophic floods in India. Although the affected areas have welcomed this, India has politely refused. India said later on the 22nd that the country's long-standing policy was to rely on domestic resources to carry out the rescue, and insisted that this was enough.

India's approach has also caused a lot of controversy. While many critics praise India** for its rapid response to Kerala, they are concerned that it has not invested enough money to help the devastated state rebuild. India has pledged $85 million this month for reconstruction.

But this figure is not only far less than the amount of relief proposed by the UAE, but it is also only a fraction of the state's estimated flood losses. According to reports, the state's finance minister, Thomas ? Isaac believes the floods caused $3 billion in damage.

Although foreign official rescue is not accepted, civilian channels are acceptable. India has indicated that individuals and international associations who want to assist in disaster relief can make contributions through Prime Minister Relief of India or Relief of the Chief Minister of Kerala so that India can control the use of funds. The New York Times reported that Modi is "deeply skeptical" of non-governmental organizations, believing that they are likely to be carriers of foreign forces that want to harm India's development.

However, Modi's approach has not been understood in the affected areas. As India rejected aid from the UAE, some in Kerala said they should compensate for the damage caused by the disaster and promised more aid.

In addition, some people see India's rejection of the UAE's aid as a matter of self-esteem, as an attempt by India to shake off old stereotypes about India. The so-called stereotype is that India suffers from extreme poverty, is unable to take care of its own citizens, and always benefits from the selflessness of foreign countries.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has always wanted to turn India into the next world power, and he has worked to make India more self-sufficient in many ways, including in industry.

The research institute of the Observer Research Society, a research institute located in New Delhi? "India wants to change its status from being a recipient of aid to a recipient of aid, or at least moving towards it," Pant said. ”

To tell the truth, India's national strength is good, and the middle class is very rich and rich. However, it does not pay attention to the construction of social infrastructure, and the industry is very poor, mainly software development and financial enterprises. Those that cannot stand the test are seriously affected by the global economy and are prone to bubbles.

Zhang Changlong, October 2008.

Other (6) India has limited strength. Social development is too slow, India is now.

Deserves it, it's dirty and messy.

I don't think India can afford to lose people, so I don't dare to accept international aid, because India is poor, medical care is very poor, and even public toilets are not universal, and open defecation.

In the final analysis, India still has too much self-esteem and wants to save face, and the other is to avoid the diplomatic burden.

Another topic of Tillerson's visit to India was Afghanistan. At present, Afghanistan is still in the midst of a bloody conflict that has lasted for 16 years. As recently as August, Trump announced a new Afghanistan strategy.

It is worth noting that Trump's speech also revealed the policy orientation of further strengthening India's position in its South Asia strategy, saying that he would develop a strategic partnership with India and asking India to support Afghanistan's economic development.

India** also said that while Trump and Modi have laid the groundwork for a healthy geopolitical relationship between the two countries, India would also like to see U.S. support for India in the South Asian region.

India reportedly has a long-standing partnership with Afghanistan and has provided $2 billion in assistance for Afghanistan's economic development and infrastructure. Tillerson said India is critical to the U.S. strategy for Afghanistan and that the U.S. supports India as a leader in the region.

Prior to his visit to India, Tillerson made a surprise visit to Afghanistan on the 23rd and held talks with Ashraf Ghani. Tillerson emphasized that the new U.S. strategy in South Asia demonstrates the U.S. willingness to work with Afghanistan** and other countries in the region to address the threat of terrorism and bring peace to Afghanistan.

But India will not intervene militarily in Afghanistan," Shukra said, "and the statement points to a consensus between the two sides that India will step up humanitarian assistance and economic development programs in Afghanistan."

On September 26, Indian Defense Minister Nilmala Sitharaman made it clear in a meeting with visiting U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis in New Delhi that India would not send troops into Afghanistan but would continue to provide development and medical assistance.

India is sullenI want to be a world power, and then I'm afraid of losing faceI am afraid that I will be at the same time when I get foreign assistanceThrow away the interests of your own country, thereby rejecting all foreign aid. India occupies a large area on the map of the world, and it is calledRegional powers, the boss of South Asia, such a big country, with so many people,Refuse any foreign aid for fear of losing faceIt also makes sense.

When India was originally founded, it was weak because of its own strengthThe economic assistance of the Soviet Union and the United States was also very receptive。But when I have developed, I think that I am already very strong and can deal with these disasters and problems. In their opinion,To accept foreign aid is a kind of incompetence, in other words, yesFear of losing face

India is hell-bent on itBecome a great power in the world, and also consider themselves stronger than our country. In fact, the country is very poor and has a lot of debt, which is very inconsistent with its own positioning. So I want to change this image and change my "poor" situation, so I want toForeign aid is not acceptable

In the case of India,They feel that if they accept this aid, then the state is likely to make concessions in the future, which made them very worried, and even felt that this was a thing that outweighed the loss.

Although India is poor, it does not accept aid from any country, and they believe that there is no such thing as pie in the worldWhile being helped, the interests of their own country are also being undermined, and it is a very good thing to accept help from other countriesLose faceSo India rejects all foreign aid.