History of the third year of junior high school. 41 questions. Ask for an explanation

The Paris Peace Conference was a meeting of the victorious Allied bloc in 1919 after the end of World War I to settle the problems caused by the war and to establish a post-war peace. This peace conference was a peace conference held by the victorious countries, and it was also a peace conference manipulated by a great power. Wilson of the United States, Lloyd George, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and Clemenceau of France led the peace conference.

At the peace conference, the Treaty of Versailles was signed to dispose of Germany, and a series of peace treaties were signed with Austria, Hungary, and Turkey. They constituted the Versailles system and established the post-World War I international political landscape dominated by the United States, Britain, France, and other major victorious powers. The conference adopted a series of measures to reshape the realpolitik landscape and contain defeated countries such as Germany and Soviet Russia, while at the same time attempting to establish ideal international diplomatic norms by organizing the League of Nations.

If this is the Paris Peace Conference after World War I, then the new order must be the Versailles system.

As for this system compared to the previous system (probably the Vienna system, I don't remember much), it still did not solve the basic contradictions between the powers, which is why the delegates to the peace conference said such things

Participation in the Syndicate would conclude that it was the Paris Peace Conference.

The Paris Peace Conference was the foundation of the Versailles system.

aThe Versailles system of the Paris Peace Conference.

It should be a I remember that the Treaty of Versailles was signed in Paris.

The transportation bureau Taiji diagram is hard.

Hello! In my opinion, the answer to this question should be:

False: put forward the idea of transforming capitalist society;

Correction: It put forward the beautiful ideal that capitalism will inevitably perish and socialism will inevitably triumph. Thank you!

1.Water scarcity.

Residents' daily water supply is not available, drinking water is difficult, and the disaster of cultivated land directly leads to a decline in grain production or even no harvest.

2.There is a causal relationship between the two, and the destruction of the environment leads to severe droughts.

We must adhere to the basic national policy of protecting the environment and saving resources, take the road of sustainable development and actively participate in the cause of environmental protection.

Hope it helps.

1.Freshwater resources and economic and social development are difficult.

2.Human activities affect the natural ecology, and the natural ecology reacts on human beings. To protect nature is to protect human beings.

1.The uneven distribution of regional water resources has caused the following effects: destroying agricultural production, affecting people's livelihood, and slowing down the rate of economic development.

2.Tell us that in order to protect the ecology and protect nature, only by establishing an ecologically compatible development mode can we reduce the damage and environmental damage.

1. The multiple-choice question should be analyzed from the content given b Analysis of ancient Asian and African civilizations: the "direction" is not reflected from the question stem, but only the characteristics of local civilizations, so A is wrong, there is no European civilization or Western civilization in the question stem, so the CD two items are also incorrect.

2. The Byzantine Empire, also known as the Eastern Roman Empire, is generally considered to have begun from 395 AD to 1453. During its millennia of existence, it was generally referred to simply as the "Roman Empire", and its capital was "New Rome" - that is, Constantinople.

3. According to investigation, Genghis Khan died in 1227 when he destroyed Western Xia, Marco Polo was born in 1254, and he came to China in 1275.

A, yes, but not the most appropriate, because these are just buildings, and they don't talk about a process from barbarism to civilization.

c, ancient Europe was definitely wrong, and China is a counterexample.

d, the exchange of Eastern and Western civilizations. This question doesn't talk about communication at all. Just talk about their respective civilizational achievements.

The Byzantine Empire was part of the Roman Empire, known as Eastern Rome in history. Originally, there was only one, but later, the "smart" emperor divided the world to two sons, one and a half, called Western Rome in the west, and still took Rome as the national capital. The east is called Eastern Rome, with Byzantium as the capital.

In the case of Marco Polo, first of all, there is a problem with time, Kublai Khan is the grandson of Genghis Khan.

Secondly, Magith Khan is a European, ** interested, accompany a European to go sightseeing.

Finally, Marco Polo's travels is about what he saw and heard in the East, not what he saw and heard in Europe.

b is the Eastern Roman Empire, abbreviated as Rome.

Marco Polo arrived in China during the time of Kublai Khan, and he also traveled through China.