What to do if you are wronged for stealing, and you are wronged for not stealing

You just said to her in front of your colleagues: We have lived together for so long, and we have always regarded you as a very good friend, I don't know if you are the same!

I'm also anxious when something is stolen, but no matter what, I won't think you took it, because I trust you!

But now, I'm chilling, I don't know why you doubt me, and I don't want to know anymore, I'm really disappointed in you!

This not only shows that you have a clear conscience, but also shows that you care about her very much, and others will not doubt you, but will think that she is too suspicious.

It's been two days.

It's useless to call the police.

It's obvious that the two of you lost something, just because the thing you lost is more valuable than hers, you didn't think it was you, and it seems that she can also hand it over.

You tell her you didn't steal.

Why don't you move out?

Look, you can't live together anymore.

I think calling the police is the best thing to do.

Let ** prove that you didn't take anything from her.

And you have to call the police.

In this way, even if the thief cannot be found.

It can also indirectly prove that you didn't take it.

Alarm? There's no need to tell everyone what happened, everyone has a scale in their hearts, and it won't affect your reputation, and the most important thing is that you have to be brave enough to face it, and face it positively.

The clear person is self-clearing, as long as he doesn't do it, he doesn't need to explain anything too much, and there is such a girl who should stay away from her in the future

This girl's logic is too unreliable, aren't you, you're not in a hurry because you took her things? This simply doesn't hold water, ignore her.

Alarm? It's useless to ramble so much.

Legal analysis: If you are wronged for not stealing something, the public security organs will detain you or impose fines and other punishments. Although the public security organs are lawful in accordance with the procedures, but in the end there are no facts of the crime or there is no evidence to prove that the person suspected of committing a crime is wrongfully detained, the person concerned has the right to obtain compensation from the state.

Where, in accordance with the provisions of the relevant laws, a citizen is detained in violation of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, or in accordance with the conditions and procedures prescribed in the Criminal Procedure Law, but the detention period exceeds the time limit provided for in the Criminal Procedure Law, and a subsequent decision is made to withdraw the case, not to prosecute, or to terminate the pursuit of criminal responsibility by a judgment of acquittal, the victim has the right to compensation.

Legal basis: Article 17 of the State Compensation Law of the People's Republic of China: Where organs exercising investigative, procuratorial and adjudicative powers, as well as detention centers, prison management organs and their staffs, violate their personal rights in any of the following circumstances in the exercise of their powers, the victim shall have the right to obtain compensation:

1) Where detention measures are taken against citizens in violation of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, or detention measures are employed against citizens in accordance with the conditions and procedures provided for in the Criminal Procedure Law, but the period of detention exceeds the time limit provided for in the Criminal Procedure Law, and a decision is later made to withdraw the case in concealment, not to prosecute, or to terminate the pursuit of criminal responsibility by a judgment of acquittal;

2) Where, after employing measures to arrest a citizen, a decision is made to withdraw the case, not to prosecute, or a judgment to declare an acquittal and terminate the pursuit of criminal responsibility;

3) Where the verdict is changed to not guilty in accordance with the trial supervision procedures, and the original sentence has already been served;

4) Extorting confessions by torture or causing bodily injury or death to citizens by beating or ill-treatment, or instigating or indulging others to beat or abuse others;

5) Illegally using ** or police equipment to cause bodily injury or death to citizens.

1. What should I do if I am wronged for not stealing something.

1. If you have not been wronged for stealing, you can call the police to deal with it. Where someone is wrongfully accused of stealing something, the person concerned may report it to the police and collect evidence that they have been wronged. If a person is detained for several hours without stealing anything, if the public security organ follows the procedures and is a lawful act, and if there are no facts of the crime or there is no evidence to prove that a person suspected of committing a crime is wrongfully detained, the person concerned has the right to obtain state compensation.

2. Legal basis: Article 50 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China.

The materials that can be used to prove the facts of the case are all evidence.

Evidence includes: 1) physical evidence;

2) documentary evidence; 3) witness testimony;

4) Victim statements;

5) Confessions and justifications of criminal suspects or defendants;

6) Appraisal opinions;

7) Records of inquests, inspections, identifications, investigative experiments, and so forth;

8) Audio-visual materials and electronic data.

Evidence must be verified to be true before it can be used as the basis for a verdict.

2. What are the elements of the crime of theft?

1. The object of the crime of theft is the ownership of public or private property;

2. The crime of theft is objectively manifested in the perpetrator's act of stealing a relatively large amount of public or private property or stealing public or private property multiple times;

3. The subject of the crime of theft is a general subject, and anyone who has reached the age of criminal responsibility and has the capacity for criminal responsibility can constitute it;

4. The crime of theft is subjectively manifested as direct intent and has the purpose of illegal possession.