The new version of the Three Kingdoms, why do you support Cao and belittle Liu?

The winner is king, and the loser is the loser. This is precisely the reason why he used to support Liu and belittle Cao. But now people evaluate historical figures more objectively and comprehensively, so now to clear Cao Cao's grievances, there will be a phenomenon of supporting Cao Cao and belittleing Liu.

Everyone is just fighting for the world. It is said that Cao Cao did not proclaim himself emperor in his life, and he still tried hard to unify himself.

Originally, from a historical point of view, Cao Cao was also a generation of heroes, but it was just because he deliberately supported Liu and belittled Cao in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, with Liu Bei as the orthodox successor.

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is not the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, it is just history, so you don't have to take it too seriously.

Cao Cao was hacked as a traitor in the Song Dynasty, and Guan Yu was also mythologized in the Song Dynasty.

said that Cao Cao indiscriminately killed innocent people and held the emperor hostage. Which prince did not kill innocents indiscriminately at that time? Liu Guanzhang is the home that killed the peasant uprising.

Right. They all want to fight for the world, and who will be right and who is wrong.

The reason why "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is centered on Liu Bei and Zhuge Liang is not so much that "Luo Guanzhong's ideology is more orthodox", but that Luo Guanzhong conformed to public opinion. In the past, public opinion liked Liu Bei and Zhuge Liang, and hated Cao Cao.

According to historical records, in the Northern Song Dynasty, there were folk stories of the Three Kingdoms, and when Liu Bei failed, the audience wept bitterly; As soon as Cao Cao's failure was mentioned, everyone applauded. This proves that at least in the Northern Song Dynasty, people liked Liu Bei and hated Cao Cao.

In this case, Luo Guanzhong's "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" centered on Liu Bei and Zhuge Liang, respecting Liu and degrading Cao, was naturally welcomed by readers.

That depends on the two situations in history and romance.

Needless to say, Liu Bei in it is a waste of snacks.

But things like Liu Bei's falling son are different opinions, compared to Cao Cao's defeat in Wancheng and when he paid tribute to Dian Wei, he said: When his son is not sad when he dies, and when Dian Wei is sad, Liu Bei at least really dragged his son to the ground, instead of moving his mouth.

But Liu Bei in history lived very seriously. Throughout this career, except for the stain of going to Yizhou, he is simply a perfect person.

Even if it was the stain of Yizhou, it was only after Liu Zhang found out that he defeated Liu Zhang's main force in a dignified manner, and then entered Yizhou, returned Liu Zhang's property, and sent him to the city where he originally lived.

Hypocrisy is the instinct of politicians, and if everything comes from nature, it is not a human being, but a beast. Liu Bei's hypocrisy has made countless people fall for him and be happy to serve him, so that countless people are willing to migrate with him, even in the face of unknown bad luck, and Liu Bei himself is willing to face danger with them, then his hypocrisy is sincerity. In the same way, it is impolite for a person who teaches his son before he dies that he should not take the good for the small and do not the evil for the small, and all the speculations of the villain's heart are impolite.

Your Excellency is a master! Although it is a joke, it can also be seen that Your Excellency's understanding of the original Three Kingdoms is so penetrating!

In addition, I also talk about my own opinion, every time I watch the Three Kingdoms, I look at the Three Kingdoms with the background of the people's livelihood in the world, whenever there is a war somewhere, I check the original work, how long the war has been, how much burden the people have, and after the siege of the city, has there been any robbery of the people for military funds! How many good and innocent people have been killed. So no matter which section you read, you have to look at the social background at that time!

Although Liu Bei is very showy (hypocrite), I still think it is better than Cao Cao!

In the Three Kingdoms, I chose four wise and brave people, and I chose (Cao Cao, Zhou Yu, Zhuge Liang, Sima Yi), so I have never looked down on Cao Cao, and I valued him very much when I was the prince of the Eighteen Roads! But as a troubled time, follow your own personality, and kill people when you think of them! (The dead in the war are not counted), Cao Cao slaughtered the city!

No matter how powerful this kind of person is, a person who ignores life, I would rather be optimistic about a hypocrite who respects the personality of life!

Because the ancient people had a kind of allegiance mentality, in their eyes, Cao was a traitor who should be spurned, even if he was very politically strategic and a person suitable for the monarch, and Liu was also very talented in governing under the banner of the orthodox blood of the royal family, so he was naturally respected by the ancients.

Because Liu Bei was a descendant of the Han family, he was an orthodox royal family in the eyes of people at that time, and Cao Apu was just a nouveau riche who usurped power. ps: Liu Beizhi's incompetence and hypocrisy are well known, and future generations (including me) hate him.

The Chinese have accumulated thousands of years of inferiority, and the so-called reverence for the king is nothing but the beautification of their own preconceived concepts.

The common people are easily deceived by people like Liu Bei, who are hypocritical and righteous, and the feudal rulers hope that the common people will be stupid.

Because Liu Bei just wanted to seize the world, to play conspiracy, and repeatedly set traps for Liu Bei and Sun Quan and other troops to try to eliminate them, but this is the psychology that any person has, and there is no need to explain anything, just like the Communist Party and the Kuomintang, because the Communist Party won, so the people let their ugly deeds be exposed to let people leave the Kuomintang and take power, so this is a relative problem.

Cao Cao is not as insidious and cunning as in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms". He was a great military strategist, statesman and writer in history. The reason why "respecting Liu and degrading Cao" is because Liu Bei has royal blood and is the emperor's uncle. Therefore, it is necessary to maintain the orthodoxy of the royal family of the Han Dynasty, so as to respect Liu and degrade Cao.

was influenced by Luo Guanzhong, because the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is to support Liu and belittle Cao. Plus the orthodoxy of the ancients! It's really annoying!

Very simple. If you say Cao Cao, it's good. At that time, it would have been decided to be an anti-book. It can't be engraved and printed. Haven't you seen Dream of Red Mansions?

Because of the deep-rooted hierarchy of respect and inferiority in ancient China, people are born with respect and inferiority, Liu Bei is also known as Liu Huangshu, and is regarded as the successor of Liu's Han Dynasty, and Cao Cao is the prime minister of the Han Dynasty. Therefore, respect Liu and depreciate Cao.

I'm top Guo Jia. In fact, Liu Bei is a very hypocritical person. When he was in the White Emperor City, he also specially told Xiao Liangzi to assist Adou well.

In fact, he was told not to usurp the throne. Xiao Liangzi is actually not as smart as Guo Jia, but Guo Jia died young! -

In addition, I despise the Three Kingdoms on the 5th floor** Luo Guanzhong is influenced by people, so the Three Kingdoms are written like this Go and read the Three Kingdoms, child

Because Liu Bei's principle is benevolence and righteousness!! And Cao Cao's principle is that I would rather bear the people of the world than the people of the world bear me! Therefore, everyone will belittle Cao Bao Liu for psychological reasons! If you talk about talent and merit! Cao Cao is very bullish!

Any king has his extraordinary, like Liu Bang, who is more unbearable than Liu Bei, but he can laugh at the end.

History portrays Cao Cao as a figure who plotted to usurp the throne, while Liu Bei has always supported Han orthodoxy.

This is the literary exaggeration of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, you have to look at the essence, Liu Bei is a very powerful person who is very quiet and deep. 1.He will play the brand, otherwise Zhuge Liang, Zhao Yun, Guan Yu, and Zhang Fei why are they working so desperately?

2.No matter how you say it, the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a ** history that cannot be corrected

I also hate Liu Bei very much, hypocrite, although Cao Cao is a traitor, he dares to act.

Actually, Cao Cao is not so bad, why was he blackened like this by later generations? Cao Cao also has his own benefits.

Supporting Liu and anti-Cao? Pure political agitation, after the Southern Song Dynasty, in order to seek the legitimacy of the security and steal peace, began to vigorously publicize the legitimacy of the partial security forces represented by Liu Bei, in fact, to tell the people that Song Gaozong, like Liu Bei, did not want to recover the Central Plains, but that the northern bandits were too powerful, not that our army was incompetent, and the enemy was too cunning.

Justice. Politically speaking, Liu Bei is a legitimate hereditary royal family, but his family is in the middle of the road, and the throne has nothing to do with him. At that time, the eunuch was in power, the royal power was not guaranteed, and the wind and rain were in turmoil, and he had reason to fight for his own (family's) things.

And Cao Cao was the eunuch at that time, and then he developed and grew, and coerced the Son of Heaven to order the princes, which was a great rebellion, so ordinary people out of a deep sense of justice in their hearts would have the ideological tendency of "supporting Liu and opposing Cao".

Mainly because Luo Guanzhong himself is more inclined to benevolent government, Liu Bei is more in line with Luo Guanzhong's inner image.

Because the author's views on the two people are different, this can better reflect the personalities of some characters and better highlight the plot.

Because in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Liu Bei was used as the male protagonist, and Liu Bei was beautified.

Here's why:

1. The author needs to show the contradictions and conflicts in **, and it is necessary to choose two positive and negative two opposites, so that the reader feels that good and evil are clear, the position is clear, and there is a deeper impression;

2. The idea of "respecting Liu and degrading Cao" was formed in the Southern Song Dynasty. At that time, the ruling class of the Southern Song Dynasty was weak and incompetent, lost a large area of land north of the Yangtze River, and was content with the status quo of half of the country, which was somewhat similar to the Shu Han in the southwest during the Three Kingdoms period, which led people to respect Liu and degrade Cao Sizai;

3. "Respecting Liu and degrading Cao" mainly reflects the choice of feudal politics and feudal politicians by the broad masses of the people in accordance with the criterion of "after appeasing me, and abusing me will lead to hatred and loss", which is historically reasonable.

When I was a child, I watched the Three Kingdoms, I didn't know the world, I just played lively, and my heart was also here with Liu Bei, and I followed Luo Guanzhong's preconceived respect for Liu. When I was young, I couldn't help but admire Cao Cao, who was generous and open-minded, and able to make good decisions, and felt that Liu Bei was crying like a girl, and a man had to be like Cao Cao to be happy and revengeful, and to kill and decide.

Under normal circumstances, the romance itself has the simple feelings of folk legends, that is, to promote good and suppress evil. Cao Cao coerced the Son of Heaven to order the princes, which was definitely a typical example of "evil" in the era of loyalty to the monarch, and it could not be praised or praised. In the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Liu Bei's generosity, Zhuge Liang's wisdom and loyalty, Guan Yunchang and Zhang Fei's righteousness Bo Yuntian are highlighted, and these feelings are the most simple benevolent feelings and beautiful human character among the people.

With the change of social values and the improvement of cognitive ability, everyone no longer blindly follows books, but after having more independent thinking and value reference, after thinking about it carefully, I found that Liu Bei's benevolence and Cao Cao's treachery are actually just a stereotype that stays on the inherent model. After respecting Liu and degrading Cao for so many years, readers began to face Cao Cao squarely, unwilling to follow the clouds, unwilling to say what the author said, so he gave Cao Cao a more objective and true evaluation, compared to the previous Cao Cao depreciation so much, it looks a bit like respecting Cao, the same, began to think rationally Liu Bei Group, remove some of the aura imposed on him, compared to the previous push him so high, compared to the previous is a bit like depreciation, in fact, it should be a more objective and rational reading of readers, should be the progress of reading. I think that maybe after a while, readers will give everyone a more rational and objective evaluation, and there is no such thing as respecting and belittling anyone.

In addition, many people between Cao and Liu originally preferred Cao Cao, Cao Cao is indeed eloquent and strategic, and has excellent literary talents, which Liu Bei cannot match, and in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, he has always been a relatively poor monarch who relies on Zhuge Liang's support, and the only benefit is probably Corporal Lixian. Don't talk to me about the official history, I know the official history, I only say the general impression of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, if you really want to talk about the official history, Shu is not as strong as in the Romance at all, probably the weakest in the Three Kingdoms, and Cao Cao is the most powerful, it is more correct to respect Cao and belittle Liu.

Because the times have changed, people's values are not the same as before, after understanding history, I found that Cao Cao is very talented, more powerful than Liu Bei, and then Liu Bei is not such a good person is completely ** deliberately written, more hypocritical, and then Cao Cao does things can not be said to be bad, they are all heroes created by the times, history will inevitably happen as a last resort, people are selfish, and there will naturally change without the shackles of the ideas of the old era.

Because modern people think that Cao Cao's ability is stronger than Liu Bei, so now people begin to respect Cao Cao and belittle Liu, but in fact, Cao Cao is just stronger in his own ability, and his character is really bad.

The truth of history cannot be concealed, and modern people have come into contact with more and more of the true history of the Three Kingdoms. There is also a better understanding of the characters in this period of history.