Canon lens 35 1 4 is better for taking pictures of small children less than a year old than 85 1 2

First of all, both can be taken for children**I don't know what body you are, if it is not full-frame, then the 35 angle of view is better, and 85L may not be able to swing indoors, if you put aside the factors of the body, just talk about the lens, both can get a relatively shallow depth of field, both can be in low light (such as indoors) to complete the shooting task well, because you can't use flash to take pictures of such a small child, 35L is characterized by a wide open aperture is still relatively sharp (a bit like 135L) Moreover, the 35L focuses more quickly, and the 85L is characterized by a rather good atmosphere, and the color is even better than the 35LHowever, the focusing is a bit slow whether it is the first generation or the second generation, if it is not a 1-digit Canon body, the defocusing or focus shift phenomenon is a comprehensive recommendation35L has a wider range of applications, more convenient indoors, and relatively fast focusing.

One of the commonalities of the so-called portrait lenses is that they have a large aperture, which is convenient for imaginary backgrounds. As for the medium telephoto (e.g., 85) and the wide-angle wide aperture (e.g

35 The choice of lens depends on your use, if the shooting scene space is small, and the background is more, it is recommended to choose 35. If you want to shoot close-ups of children's faces, you will choose 85. Finally, the 85 is the Canon portrait lens king (the other is the 200 2 air cutter), and the 35 should be a more suitable lens for shooting documentary and landscapes.

85 is really not comparable to 35 when it comes to portrait shooting.

But the advantage of 35 is that you can capture and shoot at will. If you are 85, you can only shoot in a planned way, and it is easy to lose the distance indoors.

First of all, both can be taken for small children**.

Don't know what fuselage you are.

If it's not full-frame, then 35 is better.

And the 85L may not be able to swing indoors.

If you put aside the factor of the camera body and talk about the lens, both can achieve a relatively shallow depth of field, and both can do a good job of shooting in low light (such as indoors), because you can't use flash to take pictures of such a young child.

The 35L is characterized by a wide open aperture that is still sharper (a bit like the 135L) and the 35L has faster focusing.

The 85L is characterized by a pretty good atmosphere, and the color is even better than the 35LHowever, the focus is a bit slow in both the I and II generations, and if it weren't for the one-digit Canon body, there would be a defocus, or a focus shift.

The comprehensive recommendation is that 35L has a wider range of applications, is more convenient indoors, and focuses relatively quickly.

Indoor you need a 35mm wide angle. Otherwise, the portrait may not be able to shine all over the body.

Although 85mm is a portrait head, the "family interior scene" does not use this, and the second 85mm depth of field is relatively shallow (due to the relationship between focal length, not to talk about aperture), for lively and active babies, it is more troublesome to focus.

Again......You're crazy! Whoop rich lords, 35 more than 10,000**, 85 is also more than 10,000**. Did your baby** do it....Need an aperture lens? Or maybe it's the same......

When shooting indoors, it should be 35, 85 is not open, in addition, because children are small and need protection, so 35-50 is more suitable.

Shooting outdoors, it feels like it should be 85 heads.

In general, when shooting outside, the cooperation of the two heads should be the best.

It seems that you are a rice person, so don't worry about it, just one of the same.

85 is suitable for shooting people, 35 is a wide angle, and shooting people cannot highlight the subject.

It's not easy to say, it depends on the actual fuselage you use, like what the height is.

In fact, I can roughly calculate it simply:

Taking a 50mm lens, the width direction is 36mm, and the height of the scene is 1200mm, the full frame: (1200 36)*50=1700mm

Non-full-frame: (1200 36) * 80 = 2700mm if it is an 85mm lens.

Full frame: (1200 36) * 85 = 2833mm Non-full frame: (1200 36) * 136 = 4533mm Simple similar triangle calculation can be approximate. Hope it helps.

35 is best for full-body shooting, indoor shooting, or literati shooting.

The 85 is also good for shooting half-body, shoulder-body, and outdoor full-body shots, and the bokeh is relatively good, and to be honest, I like the 85 lens very much.

In fact, it is better to have 50 indoors. Wish.

My 5D Mark II+85 test, it was about five or six meters.

It's up to you to see what you like to shoot.

Portrait close-up or something, 85, the depth of field is smaller, and it will look good when shooting portraits, and the back of the blur will look good50 It's a must-have head, but it feels a little unstoppable, if you don't have special requirements for image quality, it's enough to shoot portraits, and it's a little more cost-effective, and when you see a large aperture, you can't use it, so you can adjust the aperture to the maximum It's basically 9-11, but it feels like 50 is not as good as 85

I prefer 35, I feel that it looks good to shoot portraits, and the angle of view is also larger, and the ** shooting is relatively comfortable.

In addition, if you take pictures indoors, 85 and 50 may not be very convenient to use, I am a student of photography, these are my opinions, I hope it can help you

How can you compare the lenses that are obviously not the same type? Let's talk about what you're going to shoot first.

Hello; Which of the three lenses you asked is better, now see that their use is not the same, first of all, it is all about the prime head, first of all, 35 is only the wide-angle head when taking pictures, the scene is larger, its aperture is not large enough, and the use is limited. 50 is the header only, and the aperture of this lens can also be suitable for taking pictures, people, etc. 85 is the best use of the focal point to take pictures of people, but it is not suitable for larger scenes such as scenery.

As for which one you ask is better, it depends on your specific use, and the lens that suits your requirements is a good lens for you. All right.

These are two completely different lenses, basically nothing to worry about, it mainly depends on what kind of ** you want to shoot, and what scene you want to shoot in the future.

The 85 is a medium-length prime head, a professional-grade portrait lens, and if you shoot a lot of portraits, you can buy this. However, this lens is slow to focus and easy to get out of focus, so you need to be patient when using it.

35 is a wide-angle prime head, a professional-grade landscape lens, if you shoot a lot of landscapes and they are all large-scale**, you can buy this.

How these two completely different lenses are suitable or not depends on your shooting needs.

85 is a medium-length fixed focus, which is considered a professional-grade portrait head, and there is nothing to say about image quality, color, bokeh, etc., but the focus is slow and easy to run out of focus, and you need to practice your skills to master it well.

35 is a wide-angle fixed focus, which belongs to the wide angle lens with a large focal length, sharp in-focus imaging and good bokeh effect, which can be regarded as a head that can take into account both wide-angle and bokeh, and can be used as a semi-standard lens.

If you are in a panic with a lot of money and want to buy ** lenses to support the façade, then take both of them.

Don't worry about zooming, the rabbit has focus fine-tuning, and these two lenses do completely different jobs.

I don't know what you're struggling with, do you know what you want to shoot? These two heads feel completely different when they are shot.

If you just want NB equipment ... Just buy the expensive one, like you've been hesitating to buy a Rolls-Royce or a Bugatti.

You see how you need to feel.

All three of them are good, and they are all Canon Red Circle Bulls.

It's just that the focal length is different, first of all, any focal length can shoot any subject, but different focal lengths still have their own more suitable categories:

Take full-frame SLR as an example,35More suitable for humanities、Documentary shooting、There are also travel with people shooting with scenes85Suitable for portrait shooting,This head is on Canon5D2,The focus is relatively slow,More suitable for studio portraits and posing shots,It's a little anxious to capture。

The perspective effect of 50 focal lengths is closest to the perspective effect of the human eye, so the ** shot is the most scene and the most affinity. So the 50 focal length is the header, and you can shoot anything, and at the same time, many people use 50 the least, either pursuing a wide angle of impact, or a telephoto that compresses space.

What focal length to choose is mainly determined by personal preference.

Generally speaking, 35 of the three heads have the most uses, and 85 have the least uses.

Bar, 50 is close to the field of view of the human eye, comfortable to look at, 35 and 50 are a bit bigger than the edge, not as good as 50.

These two lenses are not in conflict at all, many people have both, 35 angle of view is almost a binocular point of view, 50 is almost a monocular point of view, 35 working distance is close, it is more convenient to shoot intimate people, 50 composition is easier, the blur is better, this is also a classic focal length of humanities, portraits can be used, the key is to see your habits.

85ll just went on the market and the new head needs to wait for ten or eight years, 35l Canon is not unwilling to update, the key is that the quality of the new head is likely not to be as good as the old man.