English grammar correction in a hurry, English grammar correction error?

In the title, the space for rent should be while instead of whenever.

Here's why: While both the words whenever and while can be used to mean "when." time", the difference is that whenever means "when", while means "in."

Period". According to the context of the title, in this scene, two people are laughing at the Zen Omen, and one of them falls. In this case, you need to use while, which means "raid closed in."

Something happened during the period". Whenever, on the other hand, emphasizes frequency, i.e., something happens at any time, which is not suitable for describing the situation. So the correct answer is B

while, not a whenever。

whenever means that no matter when, it means that it will happen at this moment, and while here it means that there is a turning point.

The prototype of the sentence should be: his father was died three years ago

If it becomes perfect tense, it means that the was in the original sentence will be changed to been, that is, the verb be will be changed to been, that is, it will become has been died

So it's not right to say that there is only one HAS.

And his father was died for three years is also not right, because for . . Can only be used in the perfect tense. If you want to change a sentence, you can only change it to:

his father was died three years ago.

die is an instantaneous verb you can't say who's dying or an action has been dead for a few years when you're done in a sentence so we're going to find a word that can represent a state instead of a word that says action The answer should be has been dead, right? dead indicates the state of been, which is actually the done form of be.

die is an instantaneous action that cannot be continued (for 3 years).

dead indicates a state, which can be maintained, but dead is an adjective, and when you do it as a predicate, you should add be

His father was died for three years is wrong, and the reasons are as above.

die is an instantaneous verb that cannot be used in the perfect tense, like your sentence in the present perfect tense is not good.

It can be said that his father died three years ago. Or has beed died

This is how they are used for instantaneous verbs.

die is an instantaneous verb, "dead" is just an instant, and it cannot be used in the present perfect tense after the time period, such as: for 3 years, since last year....

The addition of be to indicate a state makes it a sustainable verb, i.e., a dead state.

'be is a past participle, but it's just a past participle of the be verb.

Also, I think the sentence should be changed to "His father has been dead for 3 years."”

dead is an adjective that follows the verb be.

If it is changed to "his father has been died for three years."”

and "His Father was Died for Three Years." "It's the passive voice.

to put up to be put up should be passive, and the school building is being built.

The second one, you're right, changed it to coming

No. In fact, from a grammatical point of view, the sentence itself is also valid after the change, but from the point of view of meaning, it is very different from what was originally intended to be expressed. The original text means "only."Such a small number of carsis produced entirely by a country" (which probably mentioned how small the quantities are), and if written as few such cars, it means".There are very few such carsis produced entirely by one country", what does "such" mean here?

I'm afraid it wasn't described above. So it can't be changed like that.

It cannot be changed to few such cars, because the words few, little, many, and nuch can be modified by so, not by such. As.

so many students

so much water

so little water

so few cars

If all other adjectives are modified with such.

Such as such a good boy

such delicious food

She should be changed to she. Because it is to be the subject of a sentence, it should use the nominative form of the pronoun. The meaning of the whole sentence is: no one understands Russian except her. (Only she understands Russian).

This is because in English there is so modifies the adjective and the so modifies the noun, but when the noun is preceded by little, few, many, muchYou can only use so when modifying, not such

No, the meaning of this sentence is that there are very few cars, and this "very" can only be used so, because so can add adjectives, and so can only add nouns You are completely wrong to change the sentence order like this, there is no such usage.

Doubts: 1, How to change this question? Why?

2. How to translate this sentence? What does it mean when he was out the other day?

Trouble analyzing sentence patterns.

Answer: Remove is from the manuscript

Translation: It just so happened that he was out the other day and was not at home.

Similarly, there are words such as break out, take place, occur, etc., which mean 'to occur, to erupt'.

The word happen here is the meaning of chance, and it is used in the sentence pattern Zetong: it happened that sth happened.It so happened that something happened.

The Other Day is a few days ago, which is equivalent to a few days ago.

He was out.

Delete is:

The sentence is to the effect of "It so happened that he was not at home the other day".

was out means to go out or not at home, and the other day means to be stuffy on one of the previous days.