Did England win the second game by refereeing 20

It's not the referee, I think it's Xiaobei. Although I don't like Becky, it was his 2 assists that England won. Especially the first ball, put me in Crouch's position and I can score it hehe, I don't mean I'm NB, I'm describing the precision of the ball.

It can be seen that the referee is obviously facing England, isn't Trinidad not shaking hands with the referee at the beginning! As for it! Sentenced several yellow cards to others, is there such a bully!

The first ball is obviously overwhelming, and the second ball is really beautiful

Which penalty is disputed?

Yes, it was a game of merit in the end, but I don't think England will go further. Let's not forget that Trinidad is not Germany and Ecuador, and England are likely to go home in the first knockout round.

England said that they didn't play very well, the midfield was all world-class, the role of the link between the previous and the next depends on them, the midfield is not in command, the strength of the whole team is definitely not good, Lampard and his performance in the Blues are like two people, I personally think that the whole team has no tacit understanding, and it is dangerous to continue like this. Yesterday the referee was a little bit towards England, but overall it was good

The first ball Crouch did crush people, but it can't be said that England's game relied on the referee!

England has always been like this! Don't be surprised!

What will England do other than rely on referees? The only time I won the championship was the misjudgment of the referee of the former Soviet Union, something! 1

Of course not, Crouch jumped first.

No, it's strength, did you watch the game?!

Yes, I agree, but Gerrard's ball is still fine! Of course, if it hadn't been the first goal, Gerrard's goal wouldn't have gone in! Trinidad and Tobago's defense is still good!

In the second match of the World Cup semi-finals, the Plaid Army Croatia scored two goals in the second half and extra time to successfully reverse the leak and win the game. This is Croatia's first time in history that they have reached the World Cup final, and the British's desire to be the "home of football" may have to wait another four years. Although England lost the game, there was some controversy over the course of the game.

The biggest controversy of the game came with Croatia's equaliser. After the game, a referee expert said that Perisic's goal was fouled first and that the goal should have been cancelled.

Croatia's goal equalised as Perisic beat Kyle Walker to slotted the ball into the back of the net. But the reproduction of slow motion shows that Perisick's feet are too high. Former international referee Itu Bandar said it was a dangerous move and that the referee should have given the attacking player a foul before he scored.

It was that goal that changed the game, with Mandzukic scoring the winning goal in overtime. Kick England out of the World Cup. It's hard to say if Perisic wasn't the first foul, but the referee decided it was a good goal and the result couldn't be changed and England had to accept it.

After entering the knockout stage of this World Cup, the use of VAR technology has shown a downward trend, which has also caused a lot of controversy in the knockout stage of this World Cup. England have also been the beneficiaries of miscalculations in previous games. In the match against Colombia, Kane committed a clear foul before being awarded a penalty, but the referee ignored it.

After the match, many Colombian fans also wrote to FIFA asking for a rematch.

Whether the judgment is correct or not, the result will not change. England, a country that had promised a lot, had to accept defeat once again. It was the first time in 52 years that they had not reached a World Cup final, but the young England side still had a chance.

In a few years, in Qatar, England will once again challenge for the title.

It was a referee misjudgement. The referee's behavior was very incorrect, and it was also very unprofessional, and in the end, there was a misjudgment.

No, it's because the overall strength of this team is not particularly strong, so they lost the game in the end, and it has nothing to do with the referee.

It's not a misjudgment, it's because the referee thinks the person committed a foul in the process of kicking, so the ball is invalidated.

I don't think it's a miscalculation because I don't think England have a particularly good mentality.

1 is 1 goal and a half), if it is a draw, the upper handicap will be lost, and the next handicap will be won; If it is 2:1, you will lose half of the buy handicap and win half of the buy handicap.

Draw Lose all the upper handicap and win all the lower handicap. 2 to 1 Half of the upper handicap is lost, and half of the lower handicap is won.

If you buy a handicap, then England 2:1 will be a draw on your ticket.

If it's a draw, you buy a goal and England loses.

The closed base is to assume that England has fallen behind by one goal before the start of the game, and simply put, it is to add a goal to the opponent of the handicap team on the final result.