Definite clause, help correct it, explain it wrong, thank you

15.The object of d i bought.

16.c = in which in the wallet.

17. right

18. right

19.Isn't A's choice B the same as C? If you know 18 questions, you should know that The Famous Writer Live is complete.

20. d = the clothes are hanging21. right

22. right

23. c = anyone who

15,d The antecedent is used as a bought definite in the clause, and the relative word can be omitted.

16, c antecedent wallet in the clause as an adverbial.

19, a antecedent house is used as an adverbial in the clause.

20, d antecedent is the subject in the clause.

21, c antecedent is used as an adverbial clause in the clause, because where is used to ask the question, so choose c23, c is not a definite clause, but an object clause. Clause c is the subject in the clause.

Question 1: Under the Bridge is an adverbial, not a sentence, and which you use is the relative pronoun of the definite clause, which follows the main clause, and under the bridge in this question is not the main clause. You can think of, however, almost directly below, this part as an insertion, which is not considered when doing the question, but only serves as supplementary information.

And the real beginning of this sentence is an existential sentence that starts with there be. This is where the sentence really begins. Therefore, I choose A.

Question 2: Do you understand such....AS is a fixed match.

But look is an active usage, look is not passive, translated as "look... she looks beautiful.Can't say she is looked beautiful

This sentence should be reverted to he looks a foolHe looked so stupid.

The first question should not be a definite clause. The middle one, however, almost directly below, can be ignored as an insertion. The latter sentence reads, "There was a small boat there, and in the boat sat a little boy."

It's obviously a sentence pattern. If you use a definite clause, you can't translate it. So choose A

The first sentence is there be sentence pattern to indicate what is in a certain place, and in the second sentence, you can't tell the usage of the verb look, and the verb has no passive usage, and you can use active to express passive.

32. Non-restrictive definite clauses.

The grammar of answer A in question 33 is inherently wrong.

There was no problem with the translation. In fact, there is no need to be so nitpicky, native speakers will not care about these small differences. You should be a high school student. Hehe.

Uh, I'm also a high school student, and I understand you. There is no clause in it, it is two sentences, and it is not quite right, it is better to change the comma to a period, because this is not a clause, a sentence can only have one set of subject-verb-object, you have two sets here, but there is only one period, so it is not right. The predicate does nothing when it appears in the clause, and of course there are several sets of subject-verb-object in a sentence if there are conjunctions.

eg: i like the girl.

i like the girl because she is pretty.(conjunction).

I like the girl who has black long hair (clause).

This sentence is not translated correctly! These are two separate sentences, and you need to add a conjunction and

In your second sentence, believe is followed by an object clause, and here you omit a that

A clause is a stand-alone sentence that you can write as a complete sentence!

But there can only be one predicate in the main clause.

Success should be successful, the clause is you will be successful, and the second half of the sentence can also be written as i believe you that will be succeful, that can be omitted, and the object clause.

HIS changed to whose

them to which

That was changed to what

When changed to that

The man whom I spoke towhat changed to that

which is changed to that

WHO changed to whom

talking with/to