Why is it good to use an Intel CPU with an ATI graphics card?

There is no basis for this, but I see a lot of people using NV graphics cards on Intel's platforms. A card with a CPU is a lot of people say, but it's the first time I've heard that Intel CPU with ATI graphics card is good. After all, AMD ATI is now a company, of course, it is the stability of its own home, after all, AMD also has its own 3A spider platform.

It's AMD's CPU, AMD's motherboard + AMD's graphics card. Thank you.

There is no basis for this.

The only reason is that Intel supports ATI's CrossFire technology by default, and to support NVIDIA's SLI technology, you need to pay a technology licensing fee, resulting in Intel's multi-card interconnection technology only being seen on high-end platforms for a long time.

Some people say that Intel motherboards and NV graphics cards are more compatible! This depends on personal hobbies, and it has nothing to do with what. It may be that the current 5870 is the king of single cards, with the strongest performance, so there are more A cards?

On the contrary, it should be better for AMD's CPU to match ATI's graphics card, because AMD's CPU and ATI's graphics card are produced by the same factory, so there is no compatibility problem. It is recommended to use AMD's motherboard + AMD's CPU + ATI graphics card, which is what AMD calls the "3A platform".

Generally, the assembly machine is so matched for film and television films,ATI's graphics card acceleration is more suitable for making film and television films,I haven't asked in detail why it's specifically.,But when we build a workstation, it's all like this.,Apple's non-linear workstation is also matched like this.,It should make sense.。

3A is commonly known as the spider platform, and the u of inter should be equipped with n card.

It doesn't matter, someone has tested it a long time ago. 3A does not have any performance bonuses and the reason why 3A is popular, I personally think, the reasons are none other than the following points: 1. CPU, low-end price, AMD's cost-effective and Intel's are more expensive. And the motherboard is also cheaper than AMD, so AMD is the first choice for people who are shy in their pockets (or unwilling to invest too much in the computer and have the attitude of having enough to buy a computer).

2. Graphics card, basically, at any price, is AMD's cost-effective. N card is at the price of GTX460, a bit of an advantage, but 5770 price reduction, 6850 listing, 5850 shrinking version listing, three-pronged approach, N card life is not good (yesterday I saw Zhongguancun **, said that Nvidia is going to enter the automotive software industry, I don't know if it was forced).

3. AMD's interface is unified and easy to upgrade, but Intel is basically a generation of U, a generation of interfaces. Installation, of course, will also take into account the factor of upgrades, so AMD still has an advantage.

Therefore, 3A will be more popular.

Of course, the high-end is still Intel's world.

In general, it doesn't matter, but the stability will be enhanced with a triple-a scheme. Only a very few cases will be inexpensive, but the graphics cards produced by some manufacturers are incompatible, and it has nothing to do with the chip.

No, it won't. I want AMD to recommend the 3A platform is actually the main cost-effective, many people have a preconceived idea, that is, 3A or i+N, in fact, many people have tested, these are the same, not saying 3A or not 3A is not good.

ATI and Nvidia (NVIDIA) are commonly known as A cards and N cards, and ATI Hayaki has it, and after being acquired by AMD, it has been fully named after AMD.

At present, N cards in the high-end field have obvious advantages, while A cards in the low-end field are more cost-effective.

The technical standard is different, and the N card is a unified stream processor, such as 9800GT has 112 stream processors.

The stream processor of the A card is different from the N card, each performing its own duties, the 4830 has 640 stream processors, and the performance is equivalent to the use effect of the 9800GT.

In general, the N-card driver optimization is better, playing most games is better than the A-card, and the heating is relatively small.

A card driver is more troublesome, but the color quality is better than N card, but you have to compare N card with a professional fever level, and it is a little faster than N card when using A for large resolution.

NVIDIA's graphics card, in the discrete graphics card market (only for discrete graphics cards, excluding integrated graphics cards), has a market share of more than 60%, is an absolute monopolist, and its position in the discrete graphics card market is equivalent to Intel's position in the CPU market.

And AMD's graphics card (or ATI's graphics card, in fact, ATI has been swallowed up by AMD in 2006, since 2010, AMD officially announced the disappearance of the ATI brand, and now it is said that ATI graphics cards are just the inertia of consumers), with a market share of only 30%.

So the fact that the number of people who use NVIDIA graphics cards is far more than AMD's is unchangeable.

Secondly, although AMD's graphics cards are now catching up in performance, and even surpassed the performance of NVIDIA graphics cards in the high-end graphics card field for a time, in the mid-range, high-end and mid-range fields, it is still Nvidia's graphics cards that are more dominant.

And NVIDIA's graphics cards are better optimized for gaming, and its drivers do an excellent job, which AMD has not been able to match so far.

AMD's graphics drivers are updated almost once a month (sometimes several times a month), but each update is not satisfactory.

NVIDIA's drivers are only updated every two or even three months, but each update provides good compatibility support for new games.

Finally, AMD's graphics card, in terms of image clarity, is indeed much better than NVIDIA's graphics card, but NVIDIA's graphics card is faster than AMD's graphics card in terms of game running speed, so the performance of the two in games can be said to have their own merits, and it is difficult to distinguish between them.

AMD also knows that it lags behind NVIDIA in the discrete graphics card market, so its graphics cards tend to be a little cheaper than NVIDIA's.