Canon Which is better, an all new 18 135 lens or an 18 200 lens that has been around for three years

Updated on number 2024-05-12
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    If they are all original Canon lenses, it will be easy to do: the 18-200 lens has a slightly larger aperture than the 18-135 lens at the same focal length (although the starting aperture size is the same, but the longer the focal length, the smaller the aperture of 18-135 relative to the 18-200), the image quality is higher, and the 18-200 lens is a little more workmanship than the 18-135 lens. If you don't often use long focal length to take pictures, the 18-135 lens is enough for you, they are all anti-shake lenses, after all, it is much cheaper, the second-hand 18-200** is still around 3000, and the 18-135 is only more than 1,000.

    If it is a secondary lens, such as the Sigma or Tamron 18-200, the imaging is still a gap compared to Canon's original 18-135 IS stabilization lens, although it is not large.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The image quality of the 18-135 is better than that of the 18-200, and the focal length of the 18-200 is more than that of the 18-135

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The smaller the zoom factor, the better the quality of the lens.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Imaging, 18-200 is slightly better, less can be left alone.

    Appearance, half a catty and eight taels.

    Stabilization, depending on whether you have these two or not, as they both have versions with stabilization.

    **, 18-200 is not very competitive.

    One shoots a little farther away.

    Well, got it.

    Conclusion: Buy whichever is cheaper and which is in good condition.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Both lenses are similar, and there is nothing good or bad. They are all set lenses, and the imaging effect is the same. Landlord, if you want to buy a lens, you might as well buy a better lens.

    If you have to choose between these two lenses, then I recommend that you go straight with the 18-135 lens! Because the focal length of the zoom of the lens is large, it will affect the shooting effect, so that the quality of the shooting will be reduced. I don't recommend you to buy an 18-200 lens, because the shorter distance is too large, which affects the quality of the film.

    So, you better leave the 18-135 shots!

    Canon 18-135 elaboration

    The Canon EF-S 18-135mm F is a high-magnification standard zoom lens with a high zoom ratio, capable of covering a focal length of 29-216mm when converted to a focal length of 35mm. The IS (Image Stabilizer) mechanism is equipped to compensate for hand shake equivalent to a shutter speed of about 4 stops at all focal lengths from wide-angle to telephoto, and can automatically distinguish between normal shooting and follow-up shooting.

    Canon 18-135

    Canon 18-135 proof.

    Canon 18-135 proof.

    Canon 18-135 proof.

    Canon 18-200 elaboration

    When shooting handheld, the IS optical image stabilization of the EF-S 18-200mm F IS lens is significant, which is equivalent to increasing the shutter speed by about 4 stops, so that you can get sharp images even when shooting in dim environments or indoors. In addition, the lens can automatically determine whether it is a follow-up shot, so as to automatically adjust the anti-shake method to improve the success rate of follow-up shooting. The optical structure of the lens is 16 elements in 12 groups, including 2 UD ultra-low dispersion elements and 2 high-precision glass molded aspherical lenses. By optimizing the lens position and coating technology, the phenomenon of flare and ghosting is reduced, and the optical quality of the lens is improved. The lens's minimum focusing distance is meters across the entire zoom range, and it has excellent close-up capabilities.

    With a circular aperture design, you can shoot beautiful bokeh effects. The EF-S 18-200mm F is lens is also equipped with a zoom ring locking device, which prevents the lens from automatically extending to avoid scratching when the lock is turned on, so as to better protect the lens. The lens is made of environmentally friendly lead-free glass.

    The filter diameter is 72 mm.

    Canon 18-200

    Canon 18-200 proof.

    Canon 18-200 proof.

    Canon 18-200 proof.

    Judging from the above two lenses, the shots of the two lenses are almost the same. But after the ** is magnified to 100%, you can tell the difference between the two lenses. The Canon 18-200 lens has a slight weakness in the **, and the 18-135 lens does not.

    So in terms of imaging effect, the 18-135 is still better than the 18-200 lens.

    Welcome to the Canon 18-200 Forum to communicate.

    Welcome to the Canon 18-135 forum to communicate, I hope the above content will be helpful to you!

Related questions
9 answers2024-05-12

The APS-C half-frame camera can be used with any Canon lens, and the full-frame can only be used with EF heads.

23 answers2024-05-12

Dear users, hello.

It is recommended that you contact your local dealer directly** for specific inquiries. >>>More

8 answers2024-05-12

If you want to save your feelings and create a new self, it is very important to change your personality, and you must have a tolerant heart, not as before, because some small things are taken into account. >>>More

10 answers2024-05-12

When it comes to ultra-wide angles, the first thing that comes to mind is the Sigma 10-20 and the Tokina 12-24, both of which are very good lenses and very cost-effective, and both have their own characteristics, one is wider and has an ultrasonic motor, and the other is better made and has a constant f4 aperture. At present, the price of Sigma lenses has increased for some reason, and Tuli has a slight price reduction, in terms of cost performance, this time Tukina 12-24 won the victory! >>>More

6 answers2024-05-12

Life is a kaleidoscope, colorful, and like a wonderful movie, presented in front of our eyes all the time. I remember one incident that stuck with me. >>>More