What do you think about the company s operation of allowing employees to voluntarily take pay cuts i

Every company likes loyal employees, and frequent job-hopping people are not good for the company's development. Because after everyone enters a company, there will be a stage of adaptation, and the contribution to the company at this stage is very small. For the time being, for an ordinary person, going to work is to earn money, and that is not to show only the loyalty of the company.

When it comes to employment, the company and the employee are a two-way street. It is believed that no employee is willing to take a pay cut. On the contrary, many employees leave their jobs because of the law because of pay cuts.

However, in order to measure the loyalty of employees, some companies allow employees to voluntarily reduce their salaries.

1. Can Voluntary Pay Cuts Really Measure Employee Loyalty?

Whether an employee is loyal to the company or not, a big factor depends on the salary, I believe that few people go to work for their own hobbies, or loyalty to the company. The company and its employees are a cooperative relationship. Loyalty to the company has nothing to do with whether or not you voluntarily take a pay cut.

Because everyone needs to earn money to support their families, if you can't earn money at work, then you can't support your family, so what's the point of going to work?

2. Why would such a company come up with such a solution?

Since it is impossible to measure employee loyalty with a salary cut, why would some companies do this? I think this is mainly a routine of this company, and as soon as this kind of regulation comes out for those who do not support salary cuts, it means that they are not loyal enough to the company, which will inevitably affect the development of the company. And the cost to the company after the voluntary salary cut is saved.

Therefore, this is also a way that the company wants to save costs, but is unwilling to propose to reduce the salary of employees.

3. How should we view the operation of such a company?

Because this kind of operation of the company is tantamount to forcing employees to voluntarily raise salaries, which is a voluntary practice. Such a company gives a very bad impression, and it will definitely have an impact on the recruitment of talents in the future, which is not conducive to the development of the company.

I think this approach is really boring and unreasonable, which in itself is a kind of distrust and excessive behavior towards employees.

The voluntary salary reduction incident has caused a great sensation, which is disrespectful to their own employees, trampling on their dignity, and contempt for labor laws, and they must be severely punished.

I don't think this kind of operation actually makes any sense, it's just a disguised salary cut by the company in order to save expenses.

It feels like another pit, but I think this company is really powerful.

Immoral. In order to test employee loyalty, the company is just to reduce the cost of the company's expenses, which has touched the actual interests of employees and is immoral.

credible, because they don't think they're good at what they can or other things to do, so they won't have the courage to quit.

This argument is not very credible, because if the salary is low, the loyalty of employees will not be high.

It can only be said that there is some truth, but it is not entirely credible. Because of the low salary, he can go at any time, and for him, he doesn't care. But if the company is interested in developing employees, then he will slowly increase his loyalty.

Of course, it is not credible, the lower the salary, the less employees want to work, how can they still be loyal?

It is not credible, if the salary is too low, the employee will not be motivated to work, and the attitude towards work is not very positive, and there will be the idea of quitting.

This claim is not credible, and there is no data to back it up, nor is it a common situation today.

The boss of an online game company posted a message in the group, the message was that the company was profitable, and asked employees to voluntarily reduce their salaries. The boss of this company did not aim for a pay cut, and he did not do so, but only to test the loyalty of his employees. I feel that the company's approach is very problematic, and this kind of behavior does not test employee loyalty.

First, those employees who voluntarily cut their salaries are only forced to be helpless, if they are really cut their salaries, they will grit their teeth with hatred for the company in their hearts, and they will also find opportunities to leave in the future. The boss may have posted that message because he felt that those employees who voluntarily took a pay cut were good employees, that is, employees who were loyal to him, and they would be loyal to him, and that if the boss said a word, other employees would follow.

I think the boss's thinking is very wrong, when the boss sends the salary reduction information, some employees voluntarily reduce their salary, they are forced to helpless.

Many employees, both old and young, are also burdened with various loans, and they cannot leave their jobs easily。They know that if they don't take the initiative to cut their salary, the boss may put on small shoes for them, and they will find all kinds of excuses to fire themselves in the future, and the pressure on them is so great that they can't afford to take this risk. Therefore, when they can't find other good jobs for the time being, they can only voluntarily reduce their salaries against their will, in fact, they are not satisfied with 10,000 in their hearts.

Second, those employees who voluntarily reduce their salaries may have nowhere to go at present and temporarily wronged themselves. I don't think the employees who take a pay cut are really loyal, they just give themselves a moment, and they will not hesitate to leave the company when they find a better opportunity in the future. And I don't have a good impression of this company in the future.

Because they know that even if they work hard, their wages will not increase, but they may even be reduced. They will feel that there is no hope in working in such a company. I think that doing this well will discourage employees' enthusiasm for work, and will make employees feel insecure and belonging.

What do you think of this behavior? Do you think this is a measure of employee loyalty?

Disagree. Because employees are reluctant to take a pay cut when it comes to payroll, testing can be embarrassing.

Do not support this practice, each employee has their own family and responsibility, why let employees sacrifice their own interests in exchange for the company's interests, but also in the name of loyalty, this is the company in disguised infringement of the legitimate interests of employees, such a company is not worth serving.

I don't think this approach is reliable at all, a big reason why employees work in the company is for the sake of work treatment, and voluntary salary cuts cannot measure loyalty, and it will also affect the company badly.

Unwilling to reduce salary means that they do not attach importance to the company, do not want to share problems for the company, do not regard the company as their own home, are not loyal to the company, and the leader will have opinions about themselves.

A company issued a document allowing employees to voluntarily take a pay cut, which is said to be done to test loyalty, and employees who do not want to do so have left.

The company issued a document to allow employees to voluntarily reduce their salary, saying that it tests loyalty, and if you are unwilling to do so, the leader may target you and find you trouble everywhere, and at the same time, when paying wages, you will also reduce your salary for various reasons.

I don't think the company would have given its employees small shoes, but that's just my personal opinion. However, judging from the company's approach, this voluntary salary reduction does have such a meaning in it, and I have to think about it more.

The company issued a document to allow employees to voluntarily reduce their salaries, saying that if they are not willing to cut, it will definitely cause a large number of personnel to leave and lose talents.

This is unreasonable, because everyone is not willing to lower their wages, and it cannot be said that they are just disloyal.

If you are not willing to take an automatic pay cut, you will not be affected too much, but the company will have a certain opinion about the employee.

Involuntary will be highlighted, and then you may be dismissed, you will be marginalized, because such a person is not loyal to the company, but even if you voluntarily drop, you will not be looked down upon, and you may think that you are a bully.

After everyone graduates and goes into the society, most of them will find a job in a company that they are satisfied with through job hunting. Finding a suitable job is not easy for everyone, and the job search process is a two-way choice for the company and the candidate, which is fair to both parties, because cooperation will only start if both parties agree, and the employee and the company leader should also be on an equal footing with each other.

Strange company let employees voluntarily reduce their salaries, just to test their loyalty, and some netizens posted the chat records of a company group on the Internet, and the chat content in it is incredible. According to the picture, it can be seen that the leader of this company posted a message in the group saying that because the company's operation is good and the profit has increased, employees are allowed to apply for a salary reduction by 10% per month, and at the same time, employees who apply for a salary reduction need to work in the company for more than two years before they can apply. Such a situation in which employees are given a pay cut, according to the company's leadership, is a test of employees' loyalty to the company.

It is understood that many employees of this company later applied for voluntary salary cuts, and the so-called chat records of this company to test loyalty were **, which caused the anger of many netizens. The relationship between the company and the employee should be equal, and if such a "voluntary salary cut" is proposed by the company first, then I am afraid that the final result will not be "voluntary".

Loyalty should be through mutual trust and spontaneous generation of employees and the company should be equal relationship, a good relationship will have a certain loyalty, and this loyalty is also between employees and the company for a long time, mutual trust and self-development, rather than like this kind of company forced announcement, so that employees are "forced to voluntarily" prove their loyalty, so that the test of loyalty may not be reliable. Therefore, the company's statement is completely ignored, and even the company's leaders themselves may not be able to explain whether the so-called voluntary salary cut must be a sign of loyalty.

In addition to testing the loyalty of employees, this is also to see if the obedience of employees is enough, which will have an impact on the development of employees. In addition, if there is a real need, it can also be regarded as an act of shirking responsibility to turn the salary reduction application into reality.

Employees voluntarily cut their salaries, and everyone came out to work to make money, and even if they didn't get a salary increase for their hard work, it was absolutely very difficult to accept a salary cut. A chat record about an employee's automatic salary cut was released by netizens.

In the screenshot of the conversation, he said that the company's benefits were good, and employees were allowed to voluntarily apply for a 10% monthly salary cut, but I really didn't understand what the company thought. Since the benefits are good, why not give employees a salary increase, but encourage employees to voluntarily reduce their salaries. In addition, there is another premise for this application for a salary reduction, which is that only those who have been employed for more than 24 months can apply, and as long as the application is approved.

It is said that this is a kind of test for the company's employees, and every year there will be superstars, in order to test whether the employees are loyal enough to the company. After screenshots of the conversation circulated on online platforms. The employee has left the company, even those who are close to the employee.

Whether it was voluntary or not is unknown.

Whether to rebel or notIf a company encounters similar requirements, then whether we need to resist is also a very difficult choice. In the face of the company, we are a vulnerable group after all, and if we do not obey the company's requirements 100%, we are likely to be targeted by the company. The days that followed, as you can imagine, being pushed out to take the blame and being assigned the busiest work may become a problem that we have to face every day.

If you don't have to ask the company to take the initiative, you will ask to leave. However, finding a job is not easy, and the price of resistance is not something everyone can afford.

If it doesn't resist, then the company is likely to continue to get worse. After figuring out the principle that you dare not resist easily, we will often continue to test until we can't bear it anymore. The so-called gun shoots the first bird, and the resistance of any individual will not receive too good results, but will lead to fire.

With the mentality of self-preservation, no colleagues will stand up and speak for us. Whether to continue to endure endlessly or say no to the company's system is just a question that needs to be considered before making a decision.

In my opinion, endless patience only makes things worse, and if we don't stand up, the company will always be the same and will not change. Eventually, one day, we will lose our patience and leave the company. Rather than that, it's better to leave early.

Time is a very precious cost, and the earlier you leave, the sooner you can find a job that suits you. When one day we are no longer young, we have completely lost the right to make our own choices, and can only be at the mercy of others, being a puppet of the company.

I think it's a test of employee loyalty, they want to give employees a pay cut, they don't want to open up, let employees voluntarily choose to take a pay cut, in fact, there is no need to do this, don't test employee loyalty.

No, it just wants to suppress the salary of employees, this statement seems to be a more euphemistic, probably if you don't cut your salary, you will be gone.

I think this company just wants to empty the gloves of the white wolf, and I don't want to bear the infamy, so I issued a document asking employees to voluntarily reduce their salaries.