Finding English Sentence Structure Analysis, English Sentence Structure Analysis is very simple .

that these huge declines didn't lead to depression subject.

The verb reflects essentially is an adverb modifying verb reflectsas romer argues interpolation , as Romer thinks.

countermeasures taken by the government object, where taken by the government is a past participle as a postpositional definite to modify countermeasures

That put in these huge declines didn't lead to depression, make the whole sentence a subject clause, then it is not a sentence, but a subject.

The huge drop didn't lead to the whole thing of depression.

that leads to a subject clause (these huge...dpression), which acts as a subject component in a sentence, and the main adverb modifies the verb reflects

These huge declines did not lead to depression as a major manifestation of the response, Romer said.

It is the formal subject, and the real subject is the verb infinitive structure toguesswhat

herreactiontothe

newscould

be, where, what

herreactiontothe

newscould

be is the object clause of guess.

This sentence actually goes something like this:

toguess

whather

reactiontothe

newscouldbe

wasdifficult

The vertical line is preceded by the subject, followed by the predicate, you see, is the subject too long? In order to avoid such a top-heavy situation in the sentence, it is used as the formal subject to replace the long subject, and the real subject is moved to the end of the sentence to keep the sentence balanced.

Such sentences are very common and can be summarized in a sentence pattern: itis was

adj.+to

dosth.Representation"How to do something".

It form subject.

was a predicate.

difficult adjective.

toguess verb.

whather

reactiontothe

newscould

be) predicative clause.

Special sentence structure itisadj

todosth.What to do and what to do.

one of the men held the view that what the book said was right

One of them holds the view that what the book says is true.

This is a definite clause.

Back. What the book said was right to state the person's point of view.

It is not easy to code words, and it is satisfying to pay attention.

if. you accept my answer, please give me a thumbs up

thank you very much

why kelly dressed the way she did.It is an object clause, an object of the verb understand.

In the object clause, kelly is the subject, dressed is the predicate, the way is preceded by omitting a preposition in the table "way" in ("us"), she did is a definite clause modifying the way, and a leading word that is omitted in front of it

Good luck!

It is an object clause guided by why, because the guiding word why does not need to be added after it, and if the guiding word uses what, you need to add in.

the way she did = in the way so you don't need to add in to add it to be semanticly cumbersome.

Why should lead to a "reason adverbial clause". In addition, you can explain why you don't want to be in after the dress from the following two aspects

is both a vi, also a vt. And dress in is usually followed by "color" to describe its state, for example, our boss dressed in black yesterday

The clothes our boss wore yesterday were black. Also, there is an expression, for example, my mum doesn't't allow me to dress in that way.My mom didn't allow me to dress that way.

2.Kelly dressed the way she did = kelly dressed in this that way.