Also a third generation fighter, why does the J 10 look much worse than the F 16?

It's just that the appearance is different, China's J-10 has the shadow of an Israeli lion cub, and in addition to China's design, it is decent, streamlined and beautiful, and of course, China's craftsmanship level is also quite a gap with the United States.

But the shape does not represent everything, the combat performance of the basic model of the J-10 is still similar to that of the F-16C D, and the latest version of the advanced model has also made a lot of changes in appearance (such as changing the IDS air intake, increasing the nose down-elevation angle, cockpit coating, etc.) without greatly improving the stealth performance, and it looks better in appearance. According to the official magazine, the performance of the F-16E F is almost the same.

The A10 attack plane is not beautiful, and the Americans are idle and ugly, and they have given it the nickname "Warthog." But the results of the war are very obvious.

Similarly, although the J-10 is not beautiful (even if it is not beautiful, it is not considered ugly like the A10, many people still think it is beautiful), the combat radius, speed, acceleration, maneuver, radar reflector, and ceiling are all stronger than the F16, and the bomb load is less than the F16, but it is not much less. And the amount of anti-aircraft ** carried is no less than that of F16. F16 is an aircraft that mainly fights at medium and low altitudes, and it can be said to be an outstanding representative of this height, because the Americans have air supremacy and electromagnetic supremacy, and the opponent's air force and air defense firepower cannot be found in the United States every time, and all kinds of American aircraft can play firepower in the appropriate airspace without hurrying, which gives people a feeling that American aircraft are invincible even if it is a bulky B52.

Actually, that's not the case. And at what height can the J-10 maximize its potential? I won't talk about a lot of introductions on this website.

Take the outdated J8 as an example, the main combat area is above 10,000 meters or even 20,000 meters at high altitude high-speed - interception - enemy air force or medium and low altitude - interception - enemy cruise missiles (it is still a piece of cake for the old eight to chase the cruise missiles of the United States), if the J-8 is challenged at a low altitude below 5000 meters to challenge the F16, the old eight can be said to be dead, if the F16 is allowed to fight with the J-8 at an altitude of 20,000 meters, who will lose? --F16 can't fly to this altitude for miles, and it can't reach 10,007 before it stalls.

Not to mention the appearance, the performance is far worse! The Chinese people will boast that it is about the same as F16C D...The United States has improved F16 for more than 20 years, so that you can catch up at once? Even Russia didn't dare to speak out, and I really couldn't understand that these Chinese people who like YY were thick-skinned enough.

Because the Americans have the economic strength to pursue the needs of both appearance and performance, China has no money and can only pursue performance!

In fact, there is also a very important reason, that is, there is no publicity.

There are often F-16s in American blockbusters, completing all kinds of thrilling missions, so we will be enthusiastic when we watch them, such as Transformers, so I have a good impression of him after a long time!

Actually, I like the fighters of the su series, which are so handsome!

The F-16 is wing-body fusion, so it looks very nice and beautiful. (The F-18 without wing-body fusion is much uglier, and the F-15 without wing-body fusion is not aesthetically pleasing). Just because it's ugly doesn't mean it's better, and the F A-18 isn't very good-looking, and it's not bad at performance.

Whether it is beautiful or not is also related to the paint, like the paint of the US military feels much more beautiful, while the paint of Chinese and Russian fighters is generally gray, like tattered and tattered after being weathered.

However, the J-10 is indeed inferior to the F-16, the maneuverability is not as good as the earlier F-16 (Type A B), and the avionics equipment and multi-functionality are inferior to the Type C D.

You are ruthless enough, you can see the gap by looking at it, and you don't know the gap you can see from the **. There is a gap between the latest models of J10 and F16, and we admit this ourselves, but look, at least at your level, you will definitely not see the gap.

The level of J10 is about the same as that of the F-16C D in 03-04.

Now the latest F-16 avionics system definitely surpasses the J10. Moreover, the thrust of the Al-31FN used by the J10 is not as good as that of the F-16, so it can only use a canard layout, which is actually no way, and everyone in Europe is using canard wings.

You can't look at the appearance, to be honest, according to the aesthetics of many people, my country's ** is not as good as Europe and the United States, which does not mean that it is worse, of course, some are indeed worse, which takes time.

-!The main thing to look at for the boss aircraft is its comprehensive performance. For example, its endurance, bomb load, anti-jamming ability, etc. have nothing to do with appearance!

Just like the German rat tank in World War II, it is awesome enough to have a shape, to have firepower, to have firepower, to defend, it is more awesome, but it is not feasible, the maximum speed is only 13 kilometers per hour, and the basic attributes of the tank are completely lost, and it is super fuel-guzzling.

In addition, different models will have different design schemes, and the shape will be completely different.

The fighter is not a food that pays attention to the color and fragrance of the people, but the domestic J10 and F16 are really much worse than each other, whether it is the bomb load or the power is not as good as others, and the J10 engine is loud, to be honest, fly one at low altitude in the sky, I know that it is J10 from afar, how about F16 I have not heard of it, if J10 vs F16, the probability of shooting down with the same unit hit technology is 65%: 48%.

The J-11 currently has 102 (100 Type A, 2 Type B), at least.

There are currently 10 J-55 units, at least.

In addition, there are 53+16 imported Su-27 and 50+24 imported Su-30 (single + double).

471 J-7 of various types, 180 J-8 of various types, nearly 500 Q-5s, and 132 H-6s.

The J-10 column is equipped with 87 aircraft, the J-11B column is equipped with 30 aircraft, and the J-11A is currently being gradually replaced.

Ask in such detail, you spy to tell you the truth, you can't get the real numbers, it's impossible to know, when you ask, the people from the Ministry of State Security have already been eyeing you, upstairs, don't zb Your data is either made up by yourself or fake data on the Internet.

Judging from the engines sold by Russia to China, the J-10 is around 200 units. And the J-11 is partly because of the use of domestic engines. Preliminary estimates are around 150.

There were several regiments, and there were more than a hundred.

The Chinese J-10 and J-11 are 3rd generation aircraft (American standard).

Of course, with J-10 and J-11 as the core combat force and J-8 as the auxiliary combat force, the Chinese aircraft group has an absolute advantage!

First of all, to correct one of your mistakes, there is no model of the F-16J in Japan. Japan has a fighter-bomber improved by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries based on the American F-16 fighter, called the F-2. The main function of this fighter is to attack the sea, and the air combat capability is limited.

The condition of the Japanese F-15J is currently worrying. At present, the youngest fighters of this type are more than 15 years old, and the oldest are more than 30 years old. Since the F-15J entered service in Japan in 1982, there have been no upgrades, except for nearly 40 of them, which can fire medium-range shells.

The cabin is still a cockpit of mechanical instruments, and the radar is also very old. This type of fighter has been in a series of accidents in recent years, and there are often cases of parts being dropped during flight. Crashes also happen quite often.

If this type of fighter and China's maneuverable J-10 do a dogfight (i.e., PK between close-range combat missiles), there is a high possibility that the large overload maneuverable aircraft will disintegrate.

China's J-10 fighters and J-11 series fighters are the core combat force of China's Air Force, the fuselage is in good condition, and the electronic equipment and radar are much better than the F-15J (the 10 and 11 series are fully digital glass cockpits). In addition, the Diaoyu Islands are very close to China's mainland, and under the command of land-based radar and Air Police 2000 early warning aircraft, the actual combat effectiveness is by no means comparable to that of the F-15J. Even some later models of the J-8 (J-8F H G) also have the ability to fire medium-range bombs, so I can not exaggerate to say that once the air combat, the F-15J fleet is probably destroyed in a formation within an hour.

F15 is a heavy fighter, F16J is a light fighter specially produced for Japan, according to the fifth generation aircraft to distinguish, belongs to the same generation of fighters, J11B is a fighter-bomber with pure independent intellectual property rights, if the two armies in the East China Sea air battle, China can have some advantages in radar and other aspects, as for the J8 fighter that is about to be retired, it cannot be compared with the Japanese army.