I didn t care about it before, but now I find that many great writers have not won the Nobel Prize i

Its evaluation criteria are mainly based on the social influence of the article, on this basis, the selection of writers with literary value and ideological connotation, the influence of poetry is still very strong from the Middle Ages to modern times, and the influence of modern poetry is gradually declining, and poetry writers are gradually decreasing, so it cannot become the first choice for the Nobel Prize. In fact, it can be found that those who have won the Nobel Prize dare not say too much, there are still many writers who are smash hits, and many of them will disappear after winning the Nobel Prize....

It should be more contagious than poetry, and it is also easier to understand. The understanding of the poem is not the author himself, so it should be impossible to understand it thoroughly.

It should be said that the carrier of poetry is too small, the problems and reflections expressed are not comprehensive enough, there are many good poems, but there are few fine works, and there are almost no masterpieces, and they cannot carry history and reflection.

The Nobel Prize in Literature is awarded by the Swedish Academy of Letters to the person who has produced the best work in the literary world that has an "idealistic inclination".

There are many good literary works, but it is difficult to make them have a common "ideal tendency" among the broad masses of people!

And because of language differences, many works cannot be completely translated into the language understood by the evaluation department, just like China's "Water Margin" translated into English is "The Story by the River", and "Journey to the West" translated into English is "The Story of a Monk and a Monkey". Therefore, there are so many books in China, and none of them have won awards...

The Nobel Prize is awarded to the living

Intuition: There is no poet like Haizi back then, and that group of people is well known.

Nobel Prize in LiteratureWhy are there so few winners in China? There are definitely the values of Western literature at work in this, and often there is political bias, the Cold WarIdeologyrole. But if Chinese are measured by the value standards of Chinese literature, and cannot cite Chinese writers who are confident that they can compete with first-class writers in the East and West, then there is no need to care about the differences in literary culture.

For example, Wang Anyi writes diligently, and the things he writes are also very interesting, and he maintains a high standard. But if this is the highest level of literature in the world today, I don't dare to agree with it.

Sweden. Sinologists Gao Benhan wrote to Liu Bannong, asking him to nominate the Chinese candidate for the Nobel Prize in Literature.

and Lu Xun, Tuotai Jingnong asked Lu Xun for his opinion, and Lu Xun replied: Nobel bounty, Liang Qi is not worthy of supernatural nature, and I am not worthy of it, I still owe hard work to take this money. There is no limit to the number of writers in the world who are better than me, they can't get it.

You see my translation of Little John, I made it there, but the author didn't get it. Or what I am cheap, is that I am Chinese, relying on the word "China", then, and Chen Huanzhang in the United States to do "Confucius Financial Management".

And getting a doctor is no different, and I think it's funny. I don't think China has anyone who can win the Nobel Prize, and Sweden had better ignore us and give no one. If because of the yellow-skinned people, the extra preferential treatment is lenient, but it is enough to grow the vanity of the Chinese, thinking that it can really be compared with the great writers of other countries, the result will be very bad.

Although the Nobel Literary Prize is often awarded to the wrong person, it is doubtful whether it can be awarded to Chinese according to the literary standard of the person who awarded it. Generally speaking, Lu Xun, Lao She, Shen Congwen.

Winner available. But Lu Xun said that he was not worthy, humility is one thing, and his lack of masterpieces is also one thing. For me, among the modern writers who have passed away, Lao She is the most suitable. Shen Congwen's writing is exquisite, and the literary world he constructs is relatively flat.

The Western sinology and Chinese literary circles feel that the current possible winner is probably Wang Anyi, Beidao.

Recently, there has been a remnant snow, but the domestic recognition is not very high. The depth of avant-garde writing may be there, but it is also questionable, and the breadth is certainly not enough. Personally, I think that if you want to present the award, Wang Anyi is more suitable. Mo.

The reason for winning the award can be discussed.

First, the geographical location is not good. The moment is too far away from the sight of the Nobel Prize judges, and the speed of vision development of people makes it impossible to reach it for a while.

Second, the degree of openness is not enough. The most open period in Chinese history was the Tang Dynasty, and the poetry of the Tang Dynasty was widely circulated in the world at that time, and attracted much attention from the world. However, the period of opening up like this is always short, and it often returns to the closed country in internal and external difficulties.

It's like having autism, which is difficult for outsiders to understand. In addition, Chinese itself is relatively difficult to learn, and it is known as one of the most difficult languages in the world to learn. Chinese writers have few opportunities to go abroad, they do not have a wide range of knowledge, and there are very few people who can write in foreign languages at the same time like Tagore, so it is difficult for them to form a strong impact on the world literary circle.

Third, the promotion is not enough. Over the past 100 years, China has transitioned from a war era to an era of peacebuilding amid poverty and weakness, and there seems to be too much concrete work to be done. Literary creation was also once brilliant, although Lu Xun and others wrote immortal works, but our recommendation failed to touch the hearts of the Nobel Prize judges.

Fourth, there are too few world-class writers and works. The four masterpieces we admired have a long history and missed the opportunity to be judged. In the past 100 years, there have not been many writers and works of truly world-class standards.

In particular, in recent decades, we have focused everything on economic construction, and although the intensity of reform and opening up has been continuously increased, the contingent of writers is uneven, and there are many people who are eager for quick success and quick profit. <>

Because the Nobel Prize in Literature is very difficult, there are very few people in the world who win this prize, so there are definitely very few Chinese, so each of us should work harder.

I think the main reason why Chinese have won few awards in literature awards is that Chinese culture is not really recognized and accepted by the world, so Chinese literature will not be fully recognized by the world.

The main reason is that most people will not spend many years of research in order to break some records and spend many years in order to pursue a very comfortable working environment, and most people will choose to live.

Yau Chengtong said that China has not made the first step in scientific research, and the second step is for foreign scholars to continue to do it. Can you win the Nobel Prize?

Because it is difficult for Chinese writers to appreciate their works all over the world, and it is difficult for Chinese works to be seen by writers from other countries.

In fact, many times, if we want to win such an award, we must have some more powerful strength and some of our own achievements, so that we can win this award.

Personally, I think that the reason why China has won the Nobel Prize in Literature is that China does not pay special attention to literature, and there are no particularly outstanding articles.

The object of the award is the person, not the work.

People are awarded for their works and achievements or contributions, but the Nobel Prize in Literature is ultimately awarded to people, not works.

If you look at the books published now, they are generally called "Nobel Prize-winning writers", not Nobel Prize-winning works.

The Nobel Prize in Literature rewards a writer's unique literary contribution, and a writer's unique writing practice and exploration are generally not fully presented by a single work, but are mostly presented by multiple works, so it is difficult to say which work the writer won the award for.

The Nobel Prize in Literature is awarded to writers, and of course, writers cannot do without their works, and they must have masterpieces.

Nobel Prize in Literature

Nobel Prize in Literature, literary classification of the Nobel Prize. On November 27, 1895, Nobel wrote a will, donating all his property of more than 31.22 million Swedish kronor to set up**, and awarded interest as a bonus every year to "those who have made the greatest contribution to mankind in the past year".

The qualifications of the nominees for the Prize are: Fellow of the Swedish Academy of Letters and persons equivalent to the Fellowship of Literature in various countries; Professor of Literature and Linguistics at higher education institutions; Nobel Prize in Literature; President of the National Writers' Association.

The literary prize is usually announced on the first Thursday of October, and sometimes, as in this year, it is set on the second Thursday. The award announcement only announces the final award decision and the relevant compliments. All deliberations and voting records are kept confidential and are valid for 50 years.