Why are the SLR cameras sold by Yuguang Image Digital on the Internet so cheap?

I've also seen Yuguang Image Digital on the Internet, and it's really cheap, so I came to see if anyone buys it, but now I think it's really too cheap, if it's so cheap, wouldn't it be popular? Now it seems that you can't be fooled by that.

A lot of things like Zhuo Xin or something, ** come to ask you to pay 30% or something like that, don't try to buy a second-hand camera, you can also buy a new body in the insurance is relatively new, and it is more insurable.

Fake! That ** has only been around for a few days, and now it's closed, and apparently they've come out of their shells after someone takes the bait

You can buy it! Yuguang Image Digital and Zhuo Xin or something, ** to ask you to pay 30% or something like that. The company is still running very hotly, and I am the first person to shop on their website. I'm sure they'll ship it to me in three days.

It's best not to believe it. If you don't pay through a third party, you must not believe it!

1 All hey, greedy for cheap, the original price is about 14,000. Now 5200, you believe it is no wonder that ** has to persist in advertising every day.

It turns out that someone really fell for it.

It's definitely fake if it's so cheap, and the 17-40 red circle lens will cost more than 5,000. Sympathy for LZ.

It's not a good thing to be so cheap. If you buy these cameras online or something, it's best to go to an online mall. It's a bit more secure, at least not **. Although you are eager to buy a machine, don't be greedy, otherwise you will fall into someone's trap.

It's too cheap to be outrageous, buddy, sympathize with you, I'll do a little bit of the task and get a little bit by the way.

There will be no pie in the sky? LZ should also learn its lesson!

Each has its own merits:

1. Imaging quality: Although the number of pixels is as high as 20 million, the imaging quality of DSLR is still not up to the level of optical SLR;

2. Practicality: digital SLR is convenient, you can see the effect immediately after shooting, optical SLR needs to develop the film first, and then expand the printing**;

3. Cost of use: The memory of the digital camera can accommodate a large number of **, and the good ones can be deleted and re-shot, and the ordinary 135 film of the optical SLR can shoot about 36-38 shots, and if the shot is broken, it will be broken, and it is irretrievable;

4. Operability: Because the memory of the digital camera can be deleted repeatedly, and the effect can be seen immediately after shooting, it is easier for beginners to get started.

In conclusion, DSLR is the trend of the times, and Eastman Kodak, the world's largest film company, has decided to gradually stop the production of film, so let's plunge into the arms of DSLR as soon as possible.

Just like some people like classic cars. Some people like fashion sports cars.

Early film SLRs are rarely produced now, and now almost all are DSLRs. If you want to talk about the picture quality, it is still good for film SLR, but it is actually inconvenient. A DSLR 8G card can shoot 1 to 2,000 pieces**, and the good ones are deleted directly if they are not good, and the processing on the computer is also very arbitrary, so it is still recommended to buy a DSLR.

Isn't the current DSLR camera just a DSLR?

SLR is the abbreviation of single-lens reflex camera, which is viewed with a lens and has higher accuracy. However, it is relatively high.

The difference between a digital SLR camera and a pure manual SLR camera in the past Answer: 1. The memory of recording images - the DSLR camera is a CCD; Pure manual SLR cameras (i.e., film cameras) use silver salt film (i.e., film) to record images, and after silver salt sensitization, the film is developed with post-development fixing solution, and then printed** to restore the image.

2. The working form and structure of the camera - the current DSLR cameras are all electronic cameras, battery power supply provides working kinetic energy, electronic shutter, electronic program-controlled aperture, electronic metering, and even electronic autofocus and some programming modes to provide convenience for photographic creation; Since a pure manual SLR camera (i.e., a film camera) is a pure manual camera, it must be a pure mechanical structure camera, mechanical kinetic energy, and even manual focusing ......There is no limitation that the battery cannot work without power. It's like an electronic watch and a mechanical watch.

The main difference is the above points, but the principle of optical imaging has always remained the same, and it is imaged through optical glass lenses.

More advanced and convenient than in the past. In the past, SLR cameras relied on their own experience to make their choices, but now there are many auxiliary features that allow you to shoot well.

There is no difference, only the imaging devices are different, one is: CCD CMOS and the other is film.

1. First of all, optical SLR cameras and digital SLR cameras are not contradictory concepts. The traditional SLR camera is film sensitive, and the digital SLR, that is, the digital SLR, is the circuit sensor sensitive, which is the difference between the digital SLR camera and the traditional SLR camera.

2. A single-lens reflex camera is a camera in which the light passes through a single lens and can reach the viewfinder after reflection, and the human eye can directly see the viewfinder's framing mode. Therefore, a DSLR is an optical system, whether it is a digital SLR or a traditional SLR.

3. I wonder what you mean by changing the film SLR to a digital SLR, right? This cost is very high, even higher than the cost of buying a DSLR. The steps are:

First of all, make sure that the film SLR in your hand can be detached from the back; Second, buy a DSLR back and put it on. For ordinary film SLR, this modification is meaningless, only large-format, medium-format cameras have some modification significance, but the significance is still not great, now the medium-format digital SLR has appeared all-in-one machine, the rest of the large and medium-format have also launched a combination of back and body, the traditional film SLR function is far behind the shooting needs of the back, therefore, even if the modification is successful, the difficulty of shooting is still quite large!

It is impossible to modify, Laika has had such a product with a digital back before, which is only suitable for Laika, but it is more expensive than buying a new SLR.

Theoretically, it would be enough to replace the photosensitive part with a CCD!

But in fact, the cost of your transformation can buy two digital SLRs!

Where does your circuit board come from? How big is it that can be installed next? Wait a minute...

No, but you can buy a digital one, which is more reliable.

Not all DSLR refers to the structure of the camera, digital or not refers to the medium on which the camera is stored, these two are not the same concept.

Nowadays, SLRs are all digital, because digital cameras have great advantages in storage, preview, and post-processing.

But there are still a lot of people who are playing with film SLRs, because the texture of film imaging and the color are better than digital.

Not necessarily,But now it's not a digital SLR that seems to be discontinued.,There's no market.,2000 3400 yuan to buy Nikon F70 is now only worth 200 yuan to the second-hand market.,Fainted。

Not necessarily, film, like Hasselblad and the old big film, is incomparable to digital!

Digital has only been around for a few years, and more than ten years ago it was all film mechanical SLRs.

If you buy it now, you must buy digital, and film is too niche.