I made a web page that was similar to someone else s, and he wouldn t say that I was infringing

Copyright infringement.

The object of copyright protection is the work. The Copyright Law does not explicitly indicate whether a web page is within the scope of a work, but in judicial practice, it is recognized that a web page is a work.

However, the term "work" in copyright law is not the same as what we usually call a "work". Article 2 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Copyright Law: The term "work" as used in the Copyright Law refers to intellectual achievements in the fields of literature, art and science that are original and can be reproduced in some tangible form.

"Originality" here refers to:

1.Not plagiarized; 2.It is not the only expression; 3.Have a minimum degree of creativity.

If any of the above conditions are not met, copyright is not available.

The layout and design of the homepage (note that the copyright of the entire web page is discussed here, not the copyright of one of them) does not reflect any creativity; And we can think that this kind of layout design is almost a unique expression, that is, to give you a logo, menu, search box, links, let you design a search homepage, almost everyone will adopt this layout.

So I don't think the front page is copyrighted. You can imitate it (of course, it does not include the logo that uses it to copyright it).

In fact, your "imitation" will not harm the legitimate rights and interests of the company at all, so it will not violate the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.

1. Infringing on the copyright of other people's computer software. Since it is made up of computer source codes, imitation may lead to infringement of another person's source code. Of course, not necessarily, because different source programs can implement the same ** form.

3. It may be considered to be suspected of unfair competition. If it is a business operation, imitating peers may lead to unfair competition charges.

There are 3 aspects of copyright copying, the first is that you must have a unique one.

Patenting the source code.

1) This is generally not an infringement. It's like the same.

If you post too much link content directly on your own **, so that others do not need to link to **, just look at your **, it may constitute infringement. It can be seen that "Dianping.com v. Aibang.com". In the name of search, Aibang.com glued a large amount of content from Dianping.com to its own web pages, and finally Aibang.com lost the lawsuit.

2) If you refer to the fact that the book on the end of the world is an infringement (the one on the end of the world has no right), then whether you have to pay the tort liability is more responsible, if you are talking about this, I will give you a detailed introduction

There is a "safe harbor principle" in the law, that is, if Tianya's book is not righted, you are not responsible, but if the original rights holder tells you that Tianya has infringed and asks you to revoke the link, if you don't revoke it, it is infringement.

Questions. It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

Hello, the lawyer is at your service. Please elaborate on your problem. It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

What is the difference between the name of the good night mattress and the prince good night mattress.

It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

Does the prince's good night mattress encroach on the right to a good mattress?

It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

Good night is **, the prince's good night imitation, that is, the prince wrote the front of the emperor, and the words are smaller.

It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

How can a person infringe on the mud of the good night, that is, the mattress sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

That is to say, the first prince good night is the infringing party.

It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

Hello, the lawyer is at your service. Please elaborate on your problem. It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

Hello, the lawyer is at your service. Please elaborate on your problem. It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

Hello, the lawyer is at your service. Please elaborate on your problem. It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

Hello, the lawyer is at your service. Please elaborate on your problem. It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

Hello, the lawyer is at your service. Please elaborate on your problem. It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

Hello, the lawyer is at your service. Please elaborate on your problem. It was the Jian'an mattress that sued the prince for infringing on his rights.

Hello, the lawyer is at your service. Please elaborate on your problem. 【】

Where the works of others are disseminated through information networks, or infringing works uploaded by others are used to provide services for the publication of advertisements for a fee on ** or web pages, and fees are directly or indirectly collected, it may be found to be for the purpose of making profits.

According to the "Opinions", for the purpose of making profits, without the permission of the copyright owner, the text works, films, television, fine arts, photography, video works, audio and video recordings, computer software, and other works of others are disseminated to the public through information networks, and there is one of the following love sail codeforms, it is "other serious circumstances" as provided for in article 217 of the Criminal Law:(1) the amount of illegal business operations is more than 50,000 yuan; (2) The total number of bridges disseminating the works of others is 500 or more; (3) Disseminating another person's work has actually been clicked on 50,000 or more times; (4) Disseminating the works of others through a membership system, with 1,000 or more registered members; (5) Although the amount or quantity does not meet the standards provided for in items (1) through (4), it respectively reaches more than half of the two or more standards; (6) Other situations of serious circumstances.

You also know some time ago. If you use something inconspicuous, you can't improve your reputation, and of course you won't use people to say that you are infringing. If you use something well-known and high, although you have improved your popularity, some people also want to get a piece of the pie, that's the reason.