The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has not eased, and the international community s nuclear al

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has not eased, and the international community's "nuclear alarm" has sounded, how to remove the nuclear risk? The answer to this question is probably:

1. The problem is complex and cannot be covered up in one word.

First of all, as we all know, at the end of World War II, Japan was bombed by two atomic bombs, and then the whole world saw the value of the atom, so the seeds of an atom were buried in the hearts of all countries in the world, thinking that there was a thing that could have more say and self-defense for themselves in the powers, so some countries have to have their own nuclear ** policy as long as they have the ability and conditions. And because of historical reasons, fortunately, we have seized the opportunity of history in the most difficult thing and have our own atomic bomb, so that our descendants will have the opportunity to face nuclear blackmail without being weak.

So, in such a situation, we are actually living in a nuclear equilibrium, which is not only this equilibrium, but also prone to all kinds of problems and frightening. So we are here to discuss how to remove the nuclear risk, isn't that nonsense, you must know that this matter is very complicated, involving human nature, politics and so on, and there is no solution without the joint efforts of several generations of unborn politicians, or the change of major historical conditions.

2. Fishing and ploughing, after tea and dinner.

Second, if we have to discuss in this short text, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has not yet eased, and the international community's "nuclear alarm" sounds, how to remove the nuclear risk? I think the so-called answer to this question can be found in the idle chatter and amusement of the fisherman. It is important to know that the history of mankind has been developing, and the emergence of problems is an inevitable solution, but the historical limitations of modern mankind have no way to solve this practical problem.

But this does not mean that in the future, when atoms become as ordinary as bullets, there may be a solution to the nuclear risks that arise. By then, perhaps, nuclear risks will be history.

Only by de-escalating the situation and restoring peace at an early date can we fundamentally eliminate nuclear risks, reduce miscalculations, and avoid accidents. We once again call on all parties concerned to resume negotiations as soon as possible and to find a way out of the Ukraine crisis in a calm and rational manner.

The two sides ended this tug-of-war as soon as possible. This is really costly and disruptive, and it also disrupts the pattern of the world.

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has not yet eased, and the international community's "nuclear alarm" has sounded, and if you want to eliminate this nuclear risk, the first way is for all countries to negotiate peacefully, and the United States must also be more peaceful, and the world's police cannot do it every day.

1. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has not yet eased, and the international community's "nuclear alarm" has sounded <>

Although Russia and Ukraine have reached a settlement agreement on the transportation of grain, the conflict between the two countries has not been effectively alleviated, which is the so-called nuclear alarm sounded by the international community. However, this kind of thinking is naïve and simple after all, at present, Russia does not have it at all, and wants to take out nuclear ** and use it, but with the rendering of the United States, this also makes many people feel that the risk is very great.

Second, the elimination of nuclear risks requires peaceful consultation and <> among all countries

Many of us have seen the risks in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, but we have not seen the war between the two countries, Ukraine does not actually have nuclear **, and Russia should not be the first to use nuclear **. This also means that there is still talk about the conflict between the two countries, which does not directly take out the nuclear ** for training, and peaceful negotiation is still an important means to resolve the risk, and it is also the least harmful means.

Third, the United States needs to defend itself <> to eliminate nuclear risks

Judging from the few countries that currently possess nuclear weapons, only the United States is declaring its hegemonism and power politics to the world, and they always want to hold others under their feet through their strong military strength, and at the same time they also want to seize illegitimate interests through this powerful strength. At present, the United States wants to take out nuclear weapons at every turn, which is obviously not in line with the current overall interests of the United States, nor is it in line with the interests of peace and development of all mankind, so this also requires the United States to automatically abide by some basic human codes.

The first is to change our thinking, and only when the big countries live in harmony can the world develop and progress together.

The risk of nuclear war is growing. It should be said that the war is not far away from us, and if this war is either not started or started, then the affected ones may not be as simple as one or two countries. Everyone has only heard of nuclear ** in history textbooks, but they have never had a particularly clear understanding of this thing.

There is a real-life example in history, when two atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, and the scale of those two atomic bombs was not large at that time, after all, it was when the atomic bomb was first developed. But the damage caused at that time, until now, the center of the atomic bomb **, there is no radius of several kilometers, and any plant and animal can survive, basically a game of no grass. Then you can imagine what it would be like for your nuclear missile to be 10 times larger in size at that time.

What if it's 100 times bigger? There was ** in the 60s of the last century, and now that 60 years have passed, do you think there will be no progress at all? <>

And once the war starts, it will not affect some countries, almost most countries will be affected, we should actually understand the truth of the cold lips and teeth, of course, Russia itself is very clear, nuclear ** This thing can not be used easily, but it is really forced to the last resort, then I am not good, don't think about it, it belongs to the kind of situation where the enemy is injured by 1,000 and self-damage of 800, the big deal is that everyone should not play, this is to lift the table. Russia, as an important force in the world, who will he hit with a nuclear bomb, I don't know if he fights Ukraine, he wants to kill him so hard, he doesn't need that thing at all, and if he really fights, he will be an old enemy. <>

We are so close to Russia, who can guarantee that we will not be affected? What's more, when the war is red-eyed, and the other side has a missile falling over you, then you are in trouble, and the cost of launching a missile is not cheap. But the cost of defending against a missile, especially a nuclear ** class missile, is far greater than launching one of these, and we have to take into account this risk.

Indeed, I have to say that the risk of nuclear war is really increasing in the current situation, and I really don't want such a thing to happen, after all, the power of nuclear ** is very powerful.

I don't think it's going to go any further, because a lot of countries are against it, not just Russia, so countries that want to start a nuclear war have been seriously thinking about it.

The first point is that the risk of nuclear war as a whole continues to increase, and the second point is that they will have a large diffusion point in the entire battlefield, and the situation is getting more and more serious.

Unlikely.

Ukraine means that Russia has put military personnel and ammunition near the nuclear power plant, or armed personnel are hiding in the territory of the nuclear power plant, and the Russian army attacks Ukraine from there, and Ukraine will fight back.

Of course, Ukraine has not directly said that I fought until now. The Ukrainian statements are all subtle, that is, that Russia is to blame for this incident. Ukraine** Zelensky also issued a statement saying that Russia is using the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant as a tool for terrorist acts.

The two sides are blaming each other on this issue, but no matter who started the fire, the biggest fear is the possibility of a nuclear catastrophe. In particular, the Director General of the IAEA said that almost six months after the Russian occupation of the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, the IAEA has not been able to verify the specific situation. The outside world can't figure out how dangerous it is, and it's very terrifying.

Probably not to use nuclear **, because once nuclear ** is used, then it is equivalent to the destruction of the whole world.