Russia once again mentioned nuclear war and warned NATO not to cross the red line, how did people fr

Russia once again mentioned nuclear war and warned NATO not to cross the red line, and the main reason for this answer from people from all walks of life is that this warning is not aimed at the United States, but directly at Europe. The relevant Russia *** gate shows that there are various dangers for NATO countries to ignore Russia's red lines, which may trigger various wars between the relevant nuclear powers. <>

They believe that this is not the first time that Russia has talked about the issue of nuclear war, but one of the main reasons for the outbreak of even things is that the United States continues to advance, and it is really not worth affirming this practice for the eastward expansion to advance the territory to the relevant areas of Russia. Russia hated this move of NATO very much, and chose to take action on its own, for the Russian-European war continued to break out, the United States, under the promotion of the United States, continued to support Ukraine to carry out various warrior activities against them, the situation between Russia and Ukraine is not so good, and has begun to carry out long-range strikes on various airports. <>

After a long period of control and war, Russia has taken control of most of the eastern part of Ukraine and has fully achieved its basic goal, but the situation has changed, and the Ukrainian region has still not chosen to give in, but to the growing pressure on military spending, which is very stressful for Russia. Therefore, the United States wants to enter the Russian-Ukrainian war through various methods and means. This statement by diplomats shows that they are not just referring to the United States, but to the whole of Europe.

As for Russia's red line, NATO countries have participated in various dangerous phenomena such as armed conflict with the Russian army after no war, so it has caused a related nuclear war. Therefore, this kind of case has aroused the attention and reports of relevant ** in various countries, and many people have an in-depth understanding of it.

Everyone is saying that Russia is the last warning, this is a demonstration of sovereignty, and they want to use this to deter other countries, and if everyone violates this regulation, the consequences will definitely be unimaginable.

The United States has a great cause, and it is not afraid of a war with Russia, even if it is a nuclear war, they are not afraid, and Russia is still a long way from throwing a nuclear bomb into the courtyard of the United States. But Europe is different, they are on Russia's doorstep, and many countries simply cannot carry an atomic bomb, even a minimum yield. So, Ryabkov spoke to the "NATO countries" and not to the United States.

As long as Russia first suppresses this group of European pawns, the United States will not be able to make big waves. Ryabkov's statement this time revealed a very important signal, "Russia's red lines". What does this red line mean?

He also made it clear that "wandering on the brink of a direct armed conflict".

People from all walks of life said that the fierce fighting between the two sides would cause losses to other countries and also cause energy depletion.

Personally, I believe that a nuclear conflict cannot be triggered at once, because once a nuclear war breaks out, then all mankind will not survive, and it will be us human beings who will be truly destroyed.

One thing to say, there is really no need to worry so much about the imminent outbreak of a nuclear conflict, because the major powers are not without communication channels, in order to avoid such an accidental nuclear conflict, because once a nuclear conflict occurs, it means that all mankind will suffer a nuclear attack, and then it will be the end of the entire human race. And for any great power, they will not easily use nuclear **, because it will make themselves sinners through the ages. Most of them talk about nuclear weapons, in fact, they are telling some countries that this is an ultimatum, and if you insist on going your own way, it may really trigger a nuclear war.

But the probability is very small, there is no need to worry, and generally the countries that use nuclear ** will only use nuclear ** to attack non-nuclear countries, because to strike nuclear countries, it will be a nuclear war, and then all mankind will be finished.

In any case, a nuclear conflict may be imminent, but the probability is too small. Again, because no one can bear the consequences of nuclear **, not any country. At present, the military leaders of many countries have direct communication channels, the purpose is to avoid the situation of launching a nuclear strike because of contradictions, because in the Cold War of the last century, there were several times when a nuclear war almost started, so in order to avoid this situation, the military leaders of the major powers established correspondence and greeted each other.

Of course, this is only a subjective way to avoid a nuclear conflict, and it does not necessarily guarantee that there will be no nuclear conflict, because when the core interests of some countries are damaged, when it is time of life and death, people will ignore you and directly give you a few nuclear bombs.

In general, as things stand, a nuclear conflict is out of the question, because Russia cannot afford the consequences, and the major powers will not allow it to do so.

A nuclear conflict will not happen, and a nuclear war is so powerful and impactful that it cannot be triggered so easily.

I think it's very likely that it will be on the verge of breaking out, and if this kind of conflict and war really breaks out, then it will also have a great impact on the local area, and it will cause inevitable**.

There is this possibility, there is indeed a nuclear ** recently, and if there is really no way to endure it, it will definitely be able to launch a nuclear **.

The consequences of a nuclear war are very terrible, after all, once a nuclear war breaks out, first of all, these nuclear contamination will cause a very serious blow to the lives of local residents and subsequent development, and these nuclear substances may also cause very serious mutations in the human body, in the next few decades, the local ecological environment has not been able to recover, and the impact is devastating.

Nuclear war will cause irreversible damage to human beings, and nuclear radiation will have a very great impact on human beings, which will lead to human deformities and seriously endanger the life of the earth.

The first point is that the consequences of the entire nuclear war are very terrible, the second point is that it is likely to become such a devastating disaster for mankind, and the third point is that the entire earth may disappear in an instant.

Personally, I think that this is likely to break out into war, leading to a world war, and the consequences are very serious.

It could affect part of the friendship between the two countries, and it could also lead to some conflicts between the two countries, which is not good for the international situation and can also have significant consequences for some locals, Ryabkov said that NATO's line is dangerous and warned that NATO is aware of the danger of nuclear war, and the terrible consequences will follow, the Russian Deputy Foreign Minister stressed that this must be prevented, it is possible, and Russia also needs the help of other countries. The expansion of the Andu Council is also a good way for Russia to eliminate interests, and Russia will also have new countries to cooperate with. <>

Part of the information revealed is that if NATO continues to ignore Russia's warnings or act wrongly, this could lead to a nuclear war, and the outbreak of a nuclear war could also lead these countries into serious disputes, which would be a devastating blow to the local population and the local ecology. Ignoring Russia's red lines, NATO countries are involved in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and are trying to be extremely dangerous on the brink of the current armed conflict, which, in his opinion, could lead to a further escalation of the situation and, ultimately, to the dire consequences of a military conflict between nuclear powers. <>

If the bottom line of the military confrontation between the two sides is limited to economic confrontation, then this must be the economic collapse of the European NATO member states. Because the facts show that Russia is not inseparable from the euro, but Europe is inseparable from Russian resources, and Russia once naively saw NATO as a partner, and NATO actually did not see Russia as a partner from beginning to end. Now that the two sides no longer pretend to be partners and will openly become enemies, if the two sides stay only at the level of economic confrontation, I fear that NATO itself will not suspect that the ultimate loser will be a European NATO member.

If both sides try to fight, both sides will be destroyed by nuclear **, therefore, NATO's announcement that Russia is no longer a signal from its partners is clearly a warning of a threat to Russia, but in fact, NATO has lost the initiative in Russia, and even a premeditated glorification of NATO itself, which NATO feels helpless.

It is quite possible that because NATO countries are involved in the conflict between the two countries and also ignore the interests of both sides, Russia may consider a counterattack, so it is more likely to be triggered.

Nuclear war is not imminent, after all, the harm caused by nuclear war is very serious, and it may also cause serious damage to the ecological environment between the two countries and the subsequent ones, so the leaders of these countries will not easily start a nuclear war to avoid causing more serious impacts.

Judging from the current situation, nuclear war is indeed imminent, and if a nuclear war does occur, many parts of the world will suffer very big disasters.