Is pixel or stabilization important?

This question is actually tangled, I can't, I can't tell you, it's all very important, but it's not important... The important thing is that he relatively determines the quality of the photos taken by the camera. It doesn't matter because none of them are the root cause of a camera...

If you want to buy a camera, if it's a card, then choose pixels, because anti-shake is generally electronic anti-shake for cheap card machines, but it's actually fake anti-shake, it's useless... Only optical image stabilization is something that is really used... So, choose 1 out of 2 is the pixel...

Stabilization can be solved with a stand, but pixels are the basic of the camera.

Pixels mainly determine the clarity, and the stabilization determines the forgiveness, which is more important depends on your photographic technology, if you are a novice, or the stabilization is a little more important, because even if you take EOS, SLR, if the hand is shaking, the photo will still be very blurry, if you are a veteran, or choose pixels, after all, the clarity is there.

It's all important, but I think the pixels are more important, if the pixels are not high, nothing will work, and as for the jitter, it would be nice to pay a little attention when shooting.

It's all important, if you have to choose one, then pixels! Anti-shake can add a shelf!

It's all important The key depends on which features you value more.

1. All: First of all, camera stabilization has nothing to do with the height of pixels. There is no doubt about this question.

Secondly, the way to stabilize the shake:

1 Fuselage anti-shake, a form of anti-shake composed of the mechanical structure of the fuselage, personal practical experience: more effective.

2 Lens image stabilization, which is also the mechanical structure of the lens, personal practical experience: in general, especially at the telephoto end. Basically ineffective.

3 Shutter as soon as possible, as light permits, of course. If you don't use a tripod to hold a camera, it is recommended to use more than 125 to be safe, and it is true that you have taken 40 personal shots, but it is difficult.

4 A high-quality tripod, a good brain is not as good as a bad pen, and a good hand is not as good as a tripod. No one can compare to a tripod. Personal practical experience: the most effective stabilization, recommended.

Summary: It is best to use an anti-shake body + anti-shake lens + tripod for image stabilization. Pixels are not the determining factor for jitter.

Finally: if AB is shaking, ah it won't be better.

No, the pixel only represents**clarity, the higher the pixel of the card camera, the clearer it is, and the current camera generally has image stabilization.

If it's shaking but it's not too powerful, it should still be relatively clear.

If it is the same brand, as long as the pixel is high and the sale is relatively expensive, A must be better than B.

There is no such statement.

As long as your hands don't shake.