Do you think art is more useful than science, or is science more useful than art? Or are both equall

Science and art have their own practicalities and play a certain role in the progress and development of mankind. I think both of them are equally useful.

You have to grab it with both hands, and both hands have to be hard, hehehe.

In my opinion, both are equally important, because both the development of art and culture and the development of science and technology culture are inseparable from each other's progress. The premise of the development of art and culture is the development of science and technology and culture, and only when the development of science and technology and culture leads to economic development can it be possible to further improve people's lives and further develop the development of art and culture. The development of science and technology culture is also inseparable from the development of art and culture, the development of art and culture is a supplement to the development of science and technology and culture, with the progress of science and technology and culture, the development of art and culture also needs to keep pace with the times, so as to better complement each other and help the better development of science and technology and culture.

First of all, in the development of science and technology culture, science and technology culture is a necessary development direction of modern society, only science and technology have been further expanded, people's production efficiency can be more improved, so as to generate more profits for the society. Science and technology is the most important way for countries to improve economic efficiency, so it is very necessary to develop a culture of science and technology.

Second, the development of art and culture is like our ideological or technical aspects, if we concentrate on the development of science and technology, but there is no progress in art and culture, then the backwardness of art and culture may be cautious and will hinder the progress of science and technology, so that we cannot make the development of technology better. Of course, in addition, the development of Za Xiaopei's art and culture also has a great impact on our lives, and we also need colorful and splendid cultures in our lives, as well as some positive cultures.

If a person is often bathed in a positive cultural atmosphere, then his enthusiasm for social creation will be greater than those who live in a negative cultural atmosphere, so the construction of art and cultural development is also very important. Whichever side breaks away from the other is detrimental to the development of both. Because in the process of building science and technology culture, art and culture are needed to assist, and the development of art and culture also needs to be supported by science and technology culture, and the two are inseparable.

Indispensable.

How do you decide which is more important? My approach is to assume that one or the other is missing, and then think about what such a world would look like.

But the definitions of science and art are vague to me, and for the sake of fairness, I'll try to be as broad as possible.

1 No Science:

Science in a broad sense is not only that there can be no computers, no mobile phones, no movies, television, washing machines, toilets, ......Until wheels and fire are not enough, there are no tools that orangutans can use, such as tree branches, and there are no fungal cultivation techniques for leaf-cutting ants - yes, we are not even as good as ants. But further down there seems to be no science (probably?). Then stop at the level where ants are inferior.

2 There is no art.

In fact, I think art in the broad sense is "everything that is good" - damn it, everything that is not good is gone, then it is still alive and a ball of yarn! That's not a robot!

An ant is not as good, and the other becomes a robot, which do you say is better? I can't tell the difference anyway.

Art emphasizes imagination, which can be detached from a certain reality to be creative and imaginative.

Science is relatively rigorous, emphasizing logical reasoning and argumentation, and cannot be separated from the logical chain ......

Both are important, one is divergent thinking and the other is logical thinking.

Science and art are two inseparable concepts, and in the process of the development of science there will be an artistic atmosphere, and in the process of the development of art, the elements of science will also be integrated. There is a deep connection between science and art, and it is an effective way to understand the relationship between art and science by comparing the essence of the two.

Science is an exploration of the truth of the world from a rational point of view, while art is an exploration of the beauty of the world from an emotional point of view. In the long-term development process, science and art have formed a unified and contradictory dialectical relationship, and understanding art from the understanding of science and understanding science from the understanding of art are grasps the relationship between the two from different perspectives. This article briefly describes the relationship between science and art.

There is still a big difference between the essence of science and art, and there is basically not much understanding of science in society, because there is a relatively accurate definition of science, that is, science is a subdisciplinary knowledge system that reflects the nature and laws of various phenomena in the real world. Science is a kind of comprehensive and complete system of knowledge that reflects the laws of nature and natural laws, and contains a kind of theoretical research, that is to say, as long as it is a series of studies carried out on an objective basis with careful and rigorous methods, it is scientific.

Science is a process in which people search for subjects in nature, science is truth-seeking and realistic, and compared with art, science is more of an objectivity, while art is more of a subjectivity.

But one thing in common is that both science and art are constantly improving with the times. Therefore, the two have a dialectical and unified relationship, although there is a big difference in nature, but it does not prevent the connection between the two. For example, the development of astronautics has made us have a deeper understanding of the moon, the development of microscopes has enabled us to have a more detailed understanding of the world, and the development of radio waves has made our communication more convenient.

The development of science can enable us to have a richer knowledge and understanding of the macrocosm and the microcosm, and can also promote the enrichment and perfection of the field of art.