In 2020, the owner of the car was fine, but he was thrown out of the car by someone with him, how do

The owner of the car is fine, but the person who was taken fell out of the car, how does the law say how to divide the responsible person? You should be riding a motorcycle or an electric car with people. Generally speaking, riders on motorcycles or electric scooters will adjust their balance in case of an emergency.

Therefore, it is generally the passengers who are taken to the seat who fall. When they encounter an emergency or a sharp turn, they simply don't have time to react. So in this case, the person responsible is generally the responsibility of the rider.

If you don't brake sharply or make a sharp turn, the person behind you won't fall off at all.

If the person is not taking personal protective measures, that is, the person being taken will bear most of the responsibility, if the owner does not drive according to the driving safety standards, then he will bear all the responsibility, and it depends on whose responsibility is divided, according to their respective responsibilities to divide who bears more responsibility.

It depends. If the person treated is not honest in the car, then he is primarily responsible. If he is honest in the car and has an accident, it is the owner of the car who is solely responsible.

This kind of thing should be the responsibility of the cyclist, and the person being taken is not responsible.

Hello, as for how the law stipulates, I think you have to ask the law about this, lawyers and experts will know, and we ordinary people can't know it. Hello, as for how the law stipulates, I think you have to ask the law about this, lawyers and experts will know, and we ordinary people can't know it.

Someone was thrown out of the car. So what else is there to say.

Of course, the bicycle is mainly responsible for going in the wrong direction.

The responsibility of the bicycle owner is to say that it is going against the law, and it must be in violation.

Based on the traffic police accident responsibility determination, the analysis here has no legal basis, let alone legal effect.

The responsibility lies with the cyclist, because the bicycle is driving in the wrong direction and hits the electric vehicle, the bicycle owner can only enter by himself if he falls and is injured.

The main responsibility of the retrograde bicycle is their own responsibility and ** fee.

If there is an illegal act of electric vehicles, it should also bear secondary liability and compensate for a certain amount of money.

The responsibility lies in the retrograde bicycle, and the bicycle is fully responsible.

The main responsibility is the bicycle, the electric car turns on the sidewalk, it is not illegal, if the electric car is considered a non-motorized vehicle, it can be pushed on the sidewalk, if it is ridden on the sidewalk, it is secondarily responsible.

If the car is hit by the other party, and the other party does not accept all the responsibilities and does not cooperate with the handling, you can apply to the public security department for mediation, or you can directly file a civil lawsuit against it. According to Article 84 of the Provisions on Procedures for Handling Road Traffic Accidents, the parties may resolve disputes over compensation for road traffic accident damages in the following ways.

The traffic police look at the situation, and the person is fine, basically make a record of the record, and take a look at the monitoring of the place where the incident occurred. Obtain the owner's information and contact the owner for processing.

Wrong-way driving itself is a violation of traffic rules, and pedestrians are primarily responsible for this.

He has to have evidence to sue you, and if he doesn't have evidence, you don't admit it. If there is evidence that can be used for surveillance, then you don't have to be afraid, because you are not escaping on the spot.

Young people should be fine. If you are an elderly person, you may be.

I didn't knock it down, but it shouldn't matter if I did.

It shouldn't be considered an escape, both parties are fine, if you don't need to call the police, both parties agree to be private, then it's okay, if you need to call the police, it's best to wait for the traffic police to come.

When a motor vehicle collides with a non-motor vehicle, the non-motor vehicle bears full responsibility, and the motor vehicle also bears 10% responsibility, what is the reason for this?

The first paragraph of Article 22 of the Road Traffic Safety Law stipulates: "Motor vehicle drivers shall abide by the provisions of road traffic safety laws and regulations, and drive safely and civilly in accordance with the operating specifications." "First of all, the introduction of this law and regulation is clearly to protect the interests of non-motorized vehicle drivers and pedestrians.

However, whenever there is an incident of collision between a motor vehicle and a non-motor vehicle, people will always take the initiative to target the responsibility on the motor vehicle driver, and the traffic police department will arrive at the scene of the accident at the first time, and the primary consultation object is also the motor vehicle driver. Over time, this clause has often become a "fatal killer" for determining that motor vehicles are liable for accidents.

In fact, in many cases, the cause of the accident cannot be attributed to the owner of the motor vehicle at all. Nowadays, many cities have divided motorized lanes and non-motorized lanes, and it is not difficult to observe that in many street communities, there are banners and handouts of traffic safety knowledge manuals, so that most people now know the common sense of traffic safety.

However, many non-motorized vehicle drivers ignore the instructions of traffic signals on the road, compete with motor vehicles for lanes at will, and even "see the seams" in the motor lanes, which seriously affects the traffic conditions of motor vehicles and orderly traffic order. In such cases, traffic accidents often happen inadvertently. In this case, should the motor vehicle really bear the corresponding legal and moral responsibility?

Article 129 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of China stipulates: "If damage is caused by emergency avoidance, the person who caused the danger shall bear civil liability." This shows that if a motor vehicle collides with a non-motor vehicle on the premise of unnecessary personal injury and property damage in order to avoid it, then the non-motor vehicle owner should bear civil liability for the accident.

Therefore, in many cases, when a non-motorized vehicle collides with a motor vehicle, under the premise that the non-motorized vehicle violates traffic road safety laws and regulations, even if the two parties collide, even if the interests of the non-motorized vehicle driver are damaged, the responsibility cannot be shirked to the motor vehicle owner, and it is reasonable to let him bear 10% of the responsibility is debatable.

It is best for electric vehicles to have invoices, and directly let him and the insurance company compensate for the new ones, and without invoices, they can only negotiate and solve it.

It's good that people are fine, and the motor vehicle must have insurance, and full responsibility will cover all your losses, including possible lost time pay. Just pay for a new electric car.

Where did it hit? If there is a place with a sidewalk, pedestrians must be partially responsible for not taking the sidewalk, otherwise the owner of the electric vehicle is fully responsible for the retrograde.