Four men poured 16 bottles of pesticides into the river in order to eat 3 catties of fish, what puni

Updated on society 2024-06-17
26 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    This happened in Guizhou, four men wanted to fish, but they had no choice but to use all kinds of methods to work, and finally they poured 16 bottles of pesticides into the river, just to eat 3 catties of fish, their behavior was really cruel, so that many innocent fish ended their lives, and what was even more unexpected was that,It is understood that the "pesticide throwing" incident has caused the death of all 220,000 fish in this section, and the fish within a radius of kilometers are also on the verge of extinction. This seemingly inconspicuous move has caused such serious consequences that it is believed that the four men will pay for their actions. <>

    The local people's court also conducted a public trial in response to this incidentOne person was sentenced to one year and six months in prison on the charge of illegal fishing of aquatic products, and the other three were sentenced to one year in prison with a suspended sentence of one year and six months, and thus the four also paid the price for what they did. I also hope that through this incident, some people can take this as a warning and never do things that challenge the bottom line of the law and endanger ecological security, otherwise they will be punished by the law. It is understood that the four people poured cypermethrin this time, which is fatal to aquatic organisms, which led to the death of so many fish.

    After the incident, the four of them had some remediesFor example, buying fish fry to stock, publicly apologizing, and so onBut it still can't hide the fact that they were poisoned, as far as the current situation is concerned, the ecological balance of this section of the water is still not restored to its original state, and it is still on the verge of collapse, which is really a pity for these fish. It's a pity to be living happily, but to be hit by such a sudden blow. <>

    So, I really hope that through this,We humans can be reminded not to destroy the ecological environment and the homes on which animals depend because of our personal actionsAs everyone knows, your behavior has seriously threatened the lives of animals, so these things are still not good, everyone is responsible for protecting the ecological environment, and I hope similar incidents will not happen again.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    The four men who poisoned 220,000 fish for eating 3 catties of fish finally paid the due price for their actions, and one of the four men was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, suspended for 2 years; The remaining three defendants were each sentenced to one year's imprisonment, suspended for one year and six months.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Poisoning and eating fish is obviously a stupid thing done by interests, and if you can't eat it yourself, don't want to eat it if you can't eat it for others? If only the fish and creatures along the river die in the purification capacity of the river, the surrounding rice fields may also be poisoned, and the poisoning can be solved in private, and the poisoning seriously damages the water environment and causes some people to die of poisoning, then it may be necessary to go to the environmental bureau and the police station.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    There is a high chance that they will go to jail, and their practice has seriously polluted the river, and if someone eats water in the river, they will be poisoned by it, which will cause a series of serious consequences, and these consequences should be borne by them.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Detention and fines, after all, this is destroying ecological nature, and may poison the nearby fish and shrimp, and there is no public morality.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    They also tried to fry the fish, but they didn't succeed, so they resorted to poisoning the fish. On January 30, 2020, a man and three other men went to the river to blow up fish or poison fish because they did not catch a fish, and the man also paid for the medicine to poison the fish. After all the work was ready, they fried the fish, but it didn't get the effect they wanted.

    So they resorted to the second option, pouring multiple bottles of medicine into the river to poison the fish.

    However, because they poured too much medicine, almost all fish in the kilometer section of the river were wiped out, and the total number of fish deaths reached more than 220,000. After the incident, the four men paid 10,000 yuan to pay for appraisal fees, warning signs, posters and other things, and the four people also realized their mistakes and publicly apologized to the society. After trial, the court sentenced the main offender, Li, to one year and six months in prison, suspended for two years, and sentenced the other three to one year in prison, suspended for one year and six months.

    If you really like to eat fish, you can spend some money to buy fish in the vegetable market, if you really like fishing, then there should be no fried fish or poisonous fish. Exploding fish endangers social order and endangers the personal safety of the person who bombs it. Poisonous fish is more harmful, not only destroying the ecological environment in the river, but also destroying the water quality of the river, affecting the domestic water of surrounding residents, and causing inconvenience to many people.

    It is understandable to blow up or poison fish in a private pond, and it does not harm fish from other streams, but it is worthy of criticism to do so in a public river.

    In the final analysis, the four men made such a mistake because they lacked the legal awareness to release large quantities of poison into the river as a violation and endangered public safety. I also hope that they will take this warning and not do this kind of behavior that destroys the ecological environment. Although we humans are omnivores, we should not wantonly harm other animals, which will affect the balance of nature.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    What's more, they also electrify fish and pump water. Cause damage to the entire fish pond. In fact, fishing is used for leisure and time, and destroying the ecology for one's own selfish desires should be severely punished.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    In order to eat 3 catties of fish, 4 men poured 16 bottles of pesticides into the river, and they not only poured some pesticides into the river to eat the fish, but also fished three as their own trophies.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Throw a lot of stuff into it, let the fish run out and eat it, so you fall for it. Their approach is particularly crazy and disgusting.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    This kind of people are not uncommon in rural areas, and the use of not only pesticides, 16 bottles of pesticides are only more expensive than a meal of fish, but if all poured in, the fish that will be poisoned will be hundreds of catties, and the fish is definitely more expensive than 16 bottles of pesticides.

    1. The pesticide cypermethrin used in the news has a market price of 35 yuan a bottle, which is indeed more expensive than ordinary people eating a meal of fish. 16 bottles of ** is 560 yuan. This happened in Banzhou District, Zunyi City, Guizhou Province, during the Chinese New Year, 4 men fishing fruitlessly, so they proposed to blow up the fish to poison the fish, and then chose to use the pesticide cypermethrin to poison the fish, and the pesticide ** according to the price of Guangxi is 35 yuan a bottle, they used 16 bottles, that is, 560 yuan.

    Second, the market price of small trash fish in the countryside is about 12 yuan a catty, while the market price of large fish is 18-25. Hundreds of catties of fish died in Banzhou, Zunyi, at least more than 3,000 at market prices. In terms of the unit price of small trash fish, these poisonous fish have hundreds of catties, according to profit, it has been "earned", but they poisoned the fish only on a whim, and did not pick up all the fish, only picked up 3 catties of fish and ran away, and poured all 16 bottles of pesticides into the river, which is actually no different from poisoning, fortunately the local water source is not this river, otherwise the result will only be worse.

    Although some of them were picked up, there were 220,000 dead fish in the river, and these four people had to compensate for this loss.

    3. The people who make the whole river in the countryside will not affect the fish that suffered at that time. As far as wild fish fishing is concerned, the poisonous fish is far more hateful than the electric fish party, and when the fish is poisoned, it is not only the fish, but all the aquatic products, amphibians, and even some birds in the vicinity, and 16 bottles of pesticides are used for poisoning this time, but the ecological restoration in that place may take three or five years, and if there are rare species in that area, it may be the extinction of a species.

    This kind of operation is only in the news in Guizhou, and in many rural areas, the behavior of poisoning fish and medicinal fish has always existed.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Because I haven't been able to catch fish, I'm a little angry, and I pour pesticides out of a kind of revenge, and I probably think that the fish in the river are fresher than those sold in the market, but the act of pouring pesticides is very polluting to the ecological environment, and this is also out of ignorance, and has been duly punished.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    He poured 16 bottles of pesticides into the river to eat fish, pesticides are more expensive than fish, because he didn't want others to make more money, so his selfishness made him poison the river, and his behavior will definitely be severely punished by the law.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Maybe it's for revenge, if it's to eat fish, you won't pour pesticides into the river, and the fish will be infected after eating pesticides, and you can't eat them, and this kind of behavior that harms others and doesn't benefit yourself can only be to take revenge on the owner of the fish.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    He poured 16 bottles of pesticides into the river to eat the fish, pesticides are more expensive than fish, and he did so because he wanted to harvest more fish in this way, and it was only a whim, causing a large number of fish to die, so he should be punished accordingly.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Eating fish and pouring 16 bottles of pesticides into the river, pesticides are more expensive than fish, the reason why he did this, these men are also anglers, because they can't catch them, so they have other thoughts, and put pesticides to cause a large number of fish to die.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    This person has a relatively low ideological quality and culture, and he does not understand what the consequences of doing this will be? Environmental awareness is relatively poor, and there is no legal awareness.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    But there is also this situation in life, that is, after I have fished well, I have to take extreme measures, such as fishing with nets, bombing with cannonballs, and even poisoning, and what we are going to talk about today is poisoning.

    What happened.

    The story mentioned in the question is like this, 4 men want to eat fish, and then they go to the river to fish, and then the first thing is to use artillery to blow up the fish, but it doesn't work, and then these people get angry or anxious, and then 16 people pour poison into the river.

    Rural people have poor environmental awareness?

    For the subject, I must raise the question of complaining, what is the low environmental awareness of rural people? What's wrong with us rural people? This is just a few people in the countryside, and it does not represent all the rural people, besides, if you want to talk about pollution, pollution in the city is more important, is the environmental awareness of urban people worse than that of rural people?

    So I think it's more correct to say that these people are really poor in environmental awareness, after all, I am also from the countryside, so I would not do such a thing.

    What are the bad effects?

    In a nutshell, their actions will directly lead to the collapse of the river's ecosystem. You may not understand this matter, but I will tell you in detail now.

    First of all, the poison used by these men is actually specifically aimed at fish, that is to say, more of a role in fish, how much of a problem will we mammals have if they eat, then these fish in the river are almost extinct, but then we talk about ecology is balanced, that is, one link is deducted from the other.

    Fish play an important role in this river, so after the loss of fish, other things such as aquatic weeds, or some other things, will grow wildly and occupy the entire river space.

    So what kind of situation does this lead to? It is likely that the river will become a stinky ditch, that is, the river will lose its self-cleaning function.

    You can see that these people, just to satisfy their own selfish desires, have destroyed all the fish in the entire river, and at the same time will turn the river into a stinking ditch for a long time.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Because there is no legal awareness, I don't know the serious consequences of this behavior, or because of habit, no one advertises and supervises, and it happens that it is very convenient to buy pesticides.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    First of all, some rural areas are closed to traffic, it is difficult to communicate with the outside world, and the knowledge of pesticide impact and environmental protection received is very little, and it is only known that pesticides are toxic and cannot be drunk. And most of the farmers have a low level of education and are not impressed with environmental protection. What's more, farmers pay more attention to the growth of crops in the field, and pay little attention to environmental protection.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    On the one hand, it is difficult for them to realize the consequences of doing so because of the limited level of education in rural areas, and on the other hand, because the local environmental protection propaganda is not in place, and the concept of environmental protection is not deeply rooted in the people.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    It's not the poor environmental awareness in the countryside, it's the problem of these men, and the local villagers are also very angry after the incident, so don't generalize and smear the rural people, it's these perpetrators who should be responsible!

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    I think the awareness of environmental protection in rural areas is poor:

    First, the ideological and cultural quality of rural people is not high.

    Second, the publicity work of environmental protection is not in place.

    Third, the rural areas rely on self-sufficiency to survive, and they do not have enough awareness of the idea of protecting the environment, and they do not hesitate to destroy the environment for their own sake.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Because rural people lack education and are generally not highly educated, they do not know about environmental awareness. The key to solving this problem is to increase the publicity of rural people's awareness of environmental protection, and increase their education and punishment measures.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    In rural areas, there are some people who are obsessed with their interests and always think about themselves, regardless of whether it affects the ecological environment, and should strengthen the environmental awareness of these people.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Because the middle-aged and elderly people in rural areas have little education, and no one has popularized knowledge, they don't know much and are very selfish, they don't know that pesticides are so harmful.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    It's not that the rural environmental awareness is poor, but that these 4 men are justConcerned about immediate interests, too short-sighted, as follows.

    01. In order to eat fish, a man in Guizhou poured 16 bottles of pesticides into the river. Event review: On January 30, 2020, 4 men in Guizhou were fishing by the river to no avail, among which Li wanted to explode fish or poison fish, and the other three agreed, and then Li bought 6 bottles of cypermethrin, and 4 people poured 6 bottles of pesticides into itAfter waiting for more than ten minutes, there were still no fish

    Li went to buy 10 bottles of cypermethrin again, and poured it into the river, and this time after waiting for a while, fish floated up4 people happily took 10 fish home to eat.

    Their actions caused the almost extinction of the fish in the river, and the death of 220,000 fish, which had a very large social impactSubsequently, four people were arrested。The court pronounced a verdict in the case, and all four were sentenced to more than one yearCo-funded 10,000 yuan of fish fry and publicly apologized.

    02. Strengthen the publicity of rural environmental protection awareness. In fact, I can't understand these 4 people's brain circuits, how many fish are they enough to buy pesticides? As for buying 16 bottles of pesticides,Do you want all fish to become extinct?

    I still don't know the toxicity of pesticides, but I admire these 4 people, they are so ruthless, they dare to take the fish home to eat, aren't they worried that they will end up like the fish? I don't know if the fish is delicious when the time comesOr is the medical bill expensive?

    They buy 16 bottles of pesticides, and they want to eat fishIt was not at all thought that the consequences would be so serious。Under the ** education, they finally understood that the practice was wrong, and the four people took out 10,000 yuan to buy fish fry to make up for their mistakesIt's still saved.

    To put it simply, rural areas are not poor in environmental awarenessIt's not at all, they care about what they can get, they don't care about other things at all, just look at these 4 people. Therefore, it is suggested that the publicity of rural environmental protection should be strengthened, and everyone should be aware of the importance of environmental protectionStart with yourself.

    03, finally. It is hoped that such behaviors as exploding fish and poisoning fish can be eliminated, not only to make fish extinct, but also to have a very high poisoning coefficient for human consumption.

Related questions
39 answers2024-06-17

Each cake is cut an average of 4 pieces, and it becomes 12 small cakes, and each person is divided into 3 small cakes, or you are buying one.

12 answers2024-06-17

The three-year-old girl was fed to 70 pounds to eat and broadcast", which also makes us deeply sympathetic to the woman, and also made a series of angry expressions for his parentsBecause for all of us, obesity is an extremely dangerous thing for the health of childrenAnd in such a situation, it is impossible for his parents not to know, andIn the case of obesity, it can seriously affect the growth of the childIn this case, it is already a huge body type among his peers, and if he continues to eat like this, it will inevitably bring certain hidden dangers to his safety, and it is also an extremely unfavorable behavior for his healthIt will also seriously affect the safety of their lives, and to attract attention in this way is not also an unworthy behavior of parents >>>More

6 answers2024-06-17

Are there any restrictions???

If not, just go over 3 people and 1 person come back. >>>More

11 answers2024-06-17

Click here to get all the learning materials for the Animation Production Beginner + Intermediate + Advanced course. For example, Wang's Education is a high-end education brand focusing on film and television animation, CG painting, game and animation design. >>>More

11 answers2024-06-17

a=2 If the focus is on the x-axis, set the elliptic equation: x 4 + y b =1 through the point (root 3, 1 2). >>>More