The Milky Way is flat, would it be easier to fly with a vertical silver disk?

If the gravitational attraction of the stars during the flight can be well avoided, then this flight mode will be more convenient and safer, but it is impossible to achieve this vertical flight, and there will be various external forces.

The gravitational force to be overcome by vertical flight is far beyond horizontal flight, just like the fuel consumed by the two concepts of normal forward flight and vertical upward flight on the ground, the force is too great, and the existing propulsion capacity of human aircraft is not enough to overcome this gravitational force.

Vertical flight is of course good, because it is especially convenient. It's just that there are too many stars in the universe, and they will be installed at all, so this is a particularly dangerous method of flying.

If this is the case, of course, it is more convenient, but of course, flying on a vertical silver disk in the Milky Way can only carry energy, and there are too many galaxies in the universe in this way, so this is actually a very difficult and dangerous way to fly.

If you fly vertically in the Milky Way, you can only rely on the energy you carry, and you can't rely on the gravitational slingshot effect of the big planet. So it's going to be more strenuous.

At the moment, neither humans nor unmanned probes have ever left the solar system (but there are five unmanned spacecraft that are leaving the solar system), let alone the Milky Way. Therefore, we have not yet got a complete picture of the Milky Way. The results show that our galaxy is a bar-shaped spiral galaxy with four main spiral arms, and its structure is disk-shaped.

The diameter of the silver disk is estimated to be 100,000-200,000 light years. At the center of the Milky Way is a spherical structure (nuclear sphere) with a radius of 6,500 light-years. The average thickness of a silver disc is 2000 light years.

The stars in the Milky Way are all concentrated on disks, and they all move around the galactic center. Since the Milky Way is a disk-like structure, would it be easier for us to fly out of the Milky Way from a direction perpendicular to the plane of the Milky Way? The distance between the solar system and the center of the galaxy is 26,000 light-years, and 75-100 light-years north of the Milky Way's surface, the Solar System is also about 7 kilometers and seconds away from the Milky Way's surface.

It can be seen that the shortest flight distance required to fly out of the Milky Way from a direction perpendicular to the galactic plane is about 1900 light-years, and the velocity of the solar system itself relative to the galactic plane can also be exploited.

However, this flight mode does not take full advantage of the Earth's orbital velocity around the Sun (30 km/s) and the orbital velocity of the Solar System around the galactic center (230km/s) because the ecliptic and galactic planes do not coincide. The ecliptic is the plane of the Earth's orbit around the Sun, which is not coplanar with the plane of the Milky Way, but has an angle of degrees. Of course, spacecraft like Voyager 1 can accelerate and change direction with the gravitational pull of Jupiter, Saturn, and other large planets in the solar system.

Voyager 1 flew north from the ecliptic at an angle of 35 degrees.

The angle between Voyager 1 and the Milky Way plane is about 25 degrees. The direction of flight is Ophiuchus. Through the gravitational pull of the planets, spaceships can fly in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the Milky Way.

However, with current human space technology, flying out of the galaxy is unrealistic. It is estimated that the speed required to escape from the position of the Milky Way in the solar system, the fourth cosmic velocity, is about 550 kilometers per second. Even if a spacecraft could reach the fourth cosmic velocity and travel 1,900 light-years along the shortest path, it would take 1.04 million years to fly out of the galaxy, which is the ultimate fantasy.

With current human space technology, the speed required to escape from the Milky Way from the location of the solar system is about 550 kilometers per second. And at 1,900 light-years along the shortest path, it would take 1.04 million years to fly out of the Milky Way, which is simply a fantasy.

This is indeed true, because if you operate from this angle, then his resistance is very small.

It is indeed easier to fly out of the Milky Way from the direction perpendicular to the galactic plane, because the gravitational pull is the least and the most power is obtained.

Theoretically, there's nothing wrong with that, because if you're flying in a spin, you're just going to fly back to square one, no matter how you fly.

I don't think it's going to be easier to fly out of the galaxy from the cosmic plane perpendicular to the Milky Way. Because the main force for human beings to fly out of the galaxy is the centripetal force, which is superimposed by the celestial bodies of the entire galaxy. If you fly vertically, you may experience more resistance.

In fact, it is easier to fly out of the galaxy from the direction perpendicular to the galactic plane, because the force will be less.

No. Although he is vertical, he still has a galactic gravitational pull that pulls him and prevents it from flying out.

Of course not, the Milky Way, which has been maintained for so long, does not mean that it will be able to fly out of the Milky Way, of course, there is a great gravitational pull in it.