Is there any impact on the children s schooling after the divorce of one of the spouses?

Updated on society 2024-06-05
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Hello this friend. Divorce is a matter of two people, of course, it will not affect the children's schooling, but it is necessary to consider the location of some parents' household registration, which may have an impact on the children.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The height limit for one spouse has no impact on the children's schooling after divorce. After all, parental divorce is not a criminal liability. Only the offence has an impact on a child's schooling.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Some areas will be affected, this depends on the region, and some may also involve the political review of children as soldiers, civil servants, etc., so it is recommended to find a way to deal with it.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    If one of the husband and wife has a high line, there is no impact on the children's schooling after the divorce, I think it is normal that it does not affect the children's schooling.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    After the divorce of one of the spouses, the children go to school. It probably doesn't matter. It depends on whether he is tall or short.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The height limit for one of the husband and wife is of course not affected by the divorce on the children's schooling.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Is there any impact on the children's schooling after the divorce? No impact?

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Legal analysis: If the child is only sued after being restricted from high consumption, it will not affect the child's schooling, but if the other party applies for compulsory enforcement of the refusal to perform the obligation of the effective judgment after the judgment takes effect, it will have a certain impact on the child's schooling.

    Legal basis: Article 111 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China: Where litigation participants or other persons exhibit any of the following conduct, the people's courts may impose fines or detention on the basis of the severity of the circumstances; where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law

    1) Fabricating or destroying important evidence, obstructing the people's court's trial of a case;

    2) Using violence, threats, or bribery methods such as making people to prevent witnesses from testifying, or instigating, bribing, or coercing others to give false testimony;

    3) Concealing, transferring, selling, or destroying property that has already been sealed or seized, or property that has been inventoried and ordered to be kept, or transferring property that has been frozen;

    4) Insulting, defaming, framing, beating, or retaliating against judicial personnel, litigation participants, witnesses, translators, evaluators, inquest personnel, or persons assisting in enforcement;

    5) Using violence, threats, or other methods to obstruct judicial personnel from performing their duties;

    6) Refusal to perform on a judgment or ruling of a people's court that has already taken legal effect. People's courts may fine or detain units that exhibit any of the conduct provided for in the preceding paragraph; where the crime of committing a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be pursued in accordance with law.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The Supreme Court plans to issue more judicial interpretations on the side, and will take strict measures and drafts to "restrict high consumption" for the "old lai" who refuse to implement the effective legal documents of the court. This rise to the level of judicial interpretation shows the determination and strength of the Supreme Court to solve the "difficulty in enforcement".

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    If the child is only sued after being restricted from high consumption, it will not affect the child's schooling, but if the refusal to perform the obligation of the effective judgment is applied for compulsory enforcement by the other party after the judgment takes effect, it will have a certain impact on the child's schooling. Legal basis: Article 111 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China: Where litigation participants or other persons exhibit any of the following conduct, the people's courts may impose fines or detention on the basis of the severity of the circumstances; where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law

    1) Fabricating or destroying important evidence, obstructing the people's court's trial of a case; (2) Using violence, threats, or bribery to prevent witnesses from testifying, or instigating, bribing, or coercing others to testify perjury; 3) Concealing, transferring, selling, or destroying property that has already been sealed or seized, or property that has been inventoried and ordered to be kept, or transferring property that has been frozen; 4) Insulting, defaming, framing, beating, or retaliating against judicial personnel, litigation participants, witnesses, translators, evaluators, inquest personnel, or persons assisting in enforcement; 5) Using violence, threats, or other methods to obstruct judicial personnel from performing their duties; (6) Refusal to perform on a judgment or ruling of a people's court that has already taken legal effect. People's courts may fine or detain units that exhibit any of the conduct provided for in the preceding paragraph; where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    If the child is only sued after being restricted from high consumption, it will not affect the child's schooling, but if the other party applies for compulsory enforcement of the obligation to perform the effective judgment after the judgment takes effect, it will have a certain impact on the child's schooling.

    Legal basis: Article 111 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China: Where litigation participants or other persons exhibit any of the following conduct, the people's courts may impose fines or detention on the basis of the severity of the circumstances; Where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law: (1) Fabricating or destroying important evidence, obstructing the people's court's trial of the case; (2) Using violence, threats, or bribery to prevent witnesses from testifying, or instigating, bribing, or coercing others to testify falsely; 3) Concealing, transferring, selling, or destroying property that has already been sealed or seized, or property that has been inventoried and ordered to be kept, or transferring property that has been frozen; 4) Insulting, defaming, framing, beating, or retaliating against judicial personnel, litigation participants, witnesses, translators, evaluators, inquest personnel, or persons assisting in enforcement; 5) Using violence, threats, or other methods to obstruct judicial personnel from performing their duties; (6) Refusal to perform on a judgment or ruling of a people's court that has already taken legal effect.

    People's courts may fine or detain units that exhibit any of the conduct provided for in the preceding paragraph; Where a crime is committed, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law.

Related questions
6 answers2024-06-05

Article 22 of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates: "A child may take either his father's surname or his mother's surname. It fully embodies the principle of equality between men and women and equality between husband and wife in China's marriage law. >>>More

27 answers2024-06-05

To fight for custody in the event of divorce, the following conditions are required:1The materials that prove the economic ability of both husband and wife, such as salary slips, tax payment certificates, bank deposit slips, property rights certificates, etc., can provide a good living and learning environment for the children, which is very beneficial to the fight for child custody. >>>More

14 answers2024-06-05

Hello, it should be judged according to the nature of the debt, if it is a credit problem caused by the joint debts of the husband and wife, even the divorce will have an impact on the other party; If it is a personal debt of one of the spouses, it will not affect the credit of the other party. >>>More

5 answers2024-06-05

Today I would like to share with you the topic of real estate division in divorce, which is also a concern of many customers, because the real estate contributors involved in the divorce case and the time of capital contribution will lead to different ways of division, so today I will mainly share with you the situation of who the divorce belongs to after the marriage when one party buys a house and divorces. Under normal circumstances, after marriage, one party buys a house with joint property belongs to the joint property of the husband and wife, (the principle of equal sharing, one party obtains the house, and compensates the other party according to the market; ** Housing, the income is divided equally; The two parties bid to obtain the ownership of the house, and the other party will be compensated according to the market). However, there are exceptions to the agreement. >>>More

4 answers2024-06-05

According to the provisions of the Marriage Act, a child may take either the father's or the mother's surname. After the parents divorce, the original surname cannot be changed unless the parents agree to change it or the adult child agrees to the change. Even the parent raising the child does not have the right to change it without permission.