If you send a message to a stranger, you will be satisfied, right, is this sentence illegal?

If you send a stranger to die, you will be satisfied, whether you break the law or not depends on whether the result of the matter is serious or not, under normal circumstances, it is not illegal, if you have to force people to die, if they are really dead, then they will definitely be held responsible.

Strangers will only think that you have sent the wrong message. However, this makes people sound quite uncomfortable. It is recommended that you do not vent your negative emotions on strangers, who are not sorry for you.

If you send it to just one person, you may not be breaking the law. If you post too much, it will definitely attract the attention of others. The Internet is not a place outside the law.

Everyone is responsible for their words and actions.

If you send a message to a stranger, you will be satisfied if you have to let me die, this sentence is your acquaintance (very), if you have to say so, it is simply a quarrel, and you can't violate any laws and regulations.

There is no special context, and it should not be a crime. If it is illegal, the language of the Internet can also be used as evidence.

It's not a crime to say something like this to a stranger, it's a fool's errand.

It is not possible to determine whether a crime has been committed simply by saying something bad, and it must constitute a specific act under the criminal law before a conviction can be made.

It shouldn't be too much of a problem to send it to strangers, but don't send it randomly, after all, it may affect the normal life of others.

There may be suspicion of harassment or intentional provocation. See if the other party cares or just makes a mistake.

The meaning of this sentence is that the two of us are divorced, this is a matter between the two of us, let's communicate slowly by ourselves, solve it slowly, leave when we should leave, we should get together, you shouldn't tell others about this kind of thing, outsiders are very sensitive to this kind of thing, they will spread it to each other, is this good? Let everyone know that I'm going to divorce you, are you satisfied? In fact, two people have contradictions, divorce, if it has not really reached that point, try not to say it to outsiders, make the city full of wind and rain, even if you don't want to leave, it may be necessary to leave, so this kind of thing or don't tell others, two people can solve it by themselves, sometimes it may be two people, contradictions, angry words, and not to the point of divorce, two people after calm consideration, may not want to divorce, sometimes there may be some kind of misunderstanding, After the misunderstanding was resolved, it was fine, and we were still living together.

Looks like they're complaining. Complaining about divorce between husband and wife. The quarrel was all over the city, and all relatives and friends knew about it.

It's a perfunctory sentence that is extremely disappointed in someone and doesn't want to dwell on them.

I thought to myself: It's really a lot of trouble, hurry up and solve this matter.

The emphasis is on participation, and it doesn't hurt to adopt it.

yes, especially if the questioner actually took it, and then thought about it, it might have been some kind of code word, that some small group was cheating.

So there's no way, we can't afford to hide.

I don't like this sentence either, but I actually found a soulmate. Unless the answer is particularly satisfying, I will not adopt this sentence.

There is no way, others want you to adopt.

Well, you're so selfish! You don't want to think about other people's brains to help you, as long as you order one to adopt, you hate people, you don't ask questions in the future, people in the province please adopt!

Yes, replying to others in good faith still sends ,... like thisAlas, there is no word for them.

I think too. The purpose is too clear, and I don't want to give what I wanted to give.

This is an invitation to comment on the system band.

I think too. So I don't need to.

He is unwilling, he wants to get back together but is difficult to say because of his personality, and he hopes that you can take the initiative, but if you already have a boyfriend, it is recommended that you ignore it, because the person in front of you is your choice, don't let him down, if you are still single and there is still him in your heart, then you only need to reply with one sentence, "Actually, I still love you".

He's so angry with you that he seems to love you too much.

Judging from the last sentence, it should be your problem, and you forced it, so he will say that you are satisfied!

It's nothing, life should still be lived. Little noisy,

He still wants you to be together.

Have you said this to him before?

For the sake of the children, stay strong and live, it's no big deal, everything will pass.

Does it make sense? If the other party doesn't care about you, your death is a relief for the other party, I really don't understand why it makes sense to hurt yourself for a person who doesn't love you, and gamble with yourself.

No!! Tell me about the situation.