How did the time machine be invented.? How the time machine was invented

A: At present, only Hawking's theory mentions "wormhole", which is a tunnel that can connect two different spaces, according to Hawking's "multiverse", wormholes may be connected to other universes, and may also be connected to the future or past universe, of course, this is just a hypothesis, we cannot verify it at present, the most critical thing is that the current theoretical size of the wormhole is only 10 -30m in diameter, which is much smaller than the atomic nucleus, according to this theory, the 9th floor is half right, In other words, even if the wormhole is connected to the past or the future, it is impossible to know how long it will take to split yourself into elementary particles and teleport the past, let alone how to put you back together. Einstein's theory of relativity says that the future is relative, for example, a person has traveled close to the speed of light, and returns to the earth after a period of time, although he has only stayed in the universe for 1 year, but when he returns, the earth has passed 10 years, and we can say that he has reached the future.

In addition, some people say that time will stand still when the speed of light is reached, and time will flow backwards when the speed of light is exceeded, right, but this is all theoretical, theoretically the mass is infinite when the speed of light is reached, and the energy required is of course infinite, so we can't reach the speed of light, as for the speed of light, I'll give you an example, let's say your mass is negative, then you will fly directly into space, but your mass can't be negative, so this possibility is only theoretically possible, and it's the same if you exceed the speed of light. Another point to say is the paradox of space-time tunnels proposed by many scientists, that is, if the space-time tunnel is discovered in the future, then we will definitely return to our existing space-time in the future to confirm this theory, but we have not found any traces of the arrival of humans in the future, so there will be no space-time tunnel, or we cannot use it, which is also very reasonable. b:

Einstein's principle of relativity: if you go close to the speed of light, you can go to the future, but if you think about the past, it's delusional. And when you reach the so-called future, it is only the physical and biological time in your body that slows down relative to the outside world.

C: If the speed exceeds a certain cosmic limit, time will be turned back! So the time machine will definitely be invented, it's just a matter of time.

With the Super Hadron Collider, maybe it could cause a space-time distortion in one place, or a black hole in the universe where scientists think that within each black hole there is a universe, and that black holes are a tunnel between one universe and another. At present, the time machine has not been invented, but I believe that in the near future, time travel will not be a dream.

Just by the energy of nature and the universe! And time is light! Time and space coexist! If this problem is solved, the time machine can be invented.

Time machine principle: According to the view of special relativity, when the speed of an object reaches the speed of light, time will stand still, and time will flow backwards beyond the speed of light. As light is in a vacuum under any circumstance it does not change the speed to propagate.

So one of the simplest experiments that can be obtained from this is the experiment of chasing the light.

In the process of chasing the light, you will find that no matter how fast you are, the speed of light is still the speed of light relative to yours. At this point, you may have a question.

If a time machine is invented in this world, people can go back in time and go to the future. Technology can be created in advance, extinct species can be saved, regrets can be reversed, and everyone's life can be fulfilled ......Change the past, the present you are not the current you, the future prediction inspires your laziness, criminals run away, do you still support the invention of the time machine?

I refuse. Even if the benefits obtained through the time machine can lead mankind further, and the disease is broken faster, although the time machine makes technology more advanced, species diversity is saved, people no longer have regrets, and they know their lives well, I refuse.

I don't want to go back to the past, change the past, I see that this is not the current me, change the past, just need a small action, a message, or a smaller change, over time, I am changed, everyone changes a little, the current society will become chaotic, time is no longer a timeline to move forward, it is forced to change direction, maybe the people I see are people from the past or the future, and everywhere I go is not easy to be ordered.

When I go to the future, I can see the future me, and if it is a foregone conclusion, I can become lazy. I know what I can get and work hard, or I can just rob someone else, and if I am not satisfied, I can live again. Others can do as they please, I don't dare to imagine that after having a time machine, the order is broken, the desire is indulged, and the chaos of time and space will inevitably cause destruction.

Human nature is complex.

If there is no time machine, people live their own lives, the past is a foregone conclusion, the present can only be cherished, and the future can be created, which is the best one-line timeline. The existence of the existence, the unsavevable become a memorial, the regret left behind becomes a memory, you can be relieved, you can miss, let you decide, your life is created by you, such a life is more profound than the things that can be easily changed, there will be so many classics that circulate, let people disperse.

Things can be created to be chosen, so why don't we choose the ones that far outweigh the disadvantages!

I watched an episode of Wonderful Saying when I had nothing to do, and I had never watched it before, it turned out to be a debate-type show, and I directly watched the last episode of the second season of the battle for the King of Wonders. The last debate topic is quite interesting:Should the time machine have been invented?

This topic is actually very grand, and it suddenly appeared at that time, and the debate between the pros and cons and the improvised reactions of both sides was very exciting. The positive debater Qiu Chen obviously said more reasonably, and even quoted Hawking's statement, the opposing debater Xiao Xiao fought back more at the emotional level, and Qiu Chen's final victory was also reasonable. However, when I was watching it at the time, I thought that if the opposing debater had seen Asimov's "The End of Eternity", he would have been able to make a good response on both the rational and emotional levels.

The end of eternityThis whole ** is basically inShould the time machine have been invented? ”

Asimov pondered deeply about this problem, and continued to reason about the events after the invention of the time machine for a long time. The general process is shown below, there are spoilers, don't watch it if you want to see **. In conclusion, I think the answer given by Asimov is:

It is possible that a time machine will be invented, but it should not be, and this bug may eventually be fixed by humans using a time machine.

If the dimension of time can be mastered by human beings, to a large extent, it will achieve a goal that human beings have been pursuing, that is, eternity. But eternity is not eternal, and in eternity humanity loses its challenge, Asimov gives a very strong point:

This story also reminds me of some other things. Many people struggle to maintain their own small world, hoping that their current seemingly ideal state will continue. In fact, as long as you improve your ability and get out of this circle, you will find how funny and ignorant you will be in the past.