How can you not be allowed to deal with visiting children after divorce

You cannot withhold the handling of visiting child.

The normal request to visit a child, if the child does not want to see it, then there is no way. However, for children, whether good or bad, they are destined to be their parents', this is a fact, and the grievances of adults should not be borne by children. When children are older, they will be able to distinguish between right and wrong.

I think it's best to let the other party visit the child, it's not fair and bad for your own child not to let the other party visit the child, how can you also be the child's biological parents, you can book a time, how often can you visit.

This is unlikely, the other party has the right to visit, and frequent visits are also good for the growth of children, don't affect children because of adult feelings.

After the divorce, there is no reason and it is impossible not to allow the other party to visit the child, no matter who the child is with, his parents have the right to visit him.

Even if he goes to jail, you can't stop him from visiting the child as long as he gets out of prison! Besides, he is the father (mother) of the child, this is not something that can be changed without visiting!

This cannot be stopped, because after the divorce, they are obliged to visit the children, and the party who is artificially prevented can go to the court to sue.

Your this is unreasonable, the child is also someone else's, although the child is given to you, but the other party also has the right to see the child, and the other party also gives you child support, if someone like you sues you, the court will enforce the law to let you see the child, so you had better agree on the number, such as watching the child every Saturday or whatever.

After all, the child is two people on both sides, although the child can only live with one party in the future, but the child should expect to have a father and a mother. Sometimes it's good for kids to see their mom and dad.

It seems that the pro seems to have emotions, but since the divorce has been divorced, both legally and from the psychological growth of the child, the baby should be allowed to see his parents. This is very important for the growth of the baby.

Why don't you let the other person see the child? Even if you have a lot of resentment between you, you have to take into account the feelings of your children! Being like you is extremely detrimental to your child's development! Please don't be so selfish, okay?

This is against the law. Divorced children also need to be loved by the other party, and if you deprive the other party of the right to visit the children, the other party may take you to court. Why make the relationship so stiff.

This still depends on how the divorce agreement was written at that time, I think it is better not to deprive children of this right, it is an adult's business for adults to divorce, don't let children suffer with it.

This is impossible, although you are divorced but the children are in common, the other party has the right to see their children, stop your stupid thoughts.

The other party can also watch the child after the divorce, the child is innocent, don't let the child lose the love of his family since he was a child.

This is unlikely, there is a legal provision for a maximum of one visit a month, unless he himself waives the visitation.

Such a selfish ......Visits are permitted by law.

As long as it is your common child, you have no right to keep it from him.

He doesn't go every day, and if he does, you just have to make an excuse.

The child is both parties and everyone has the right to visit the child.

There was a typo. Hehe, unless it's on the moon.

I don't know much about this, so I'll wait for other mothers to see if there's anything they can do.

Let's go abroad, I want to see how expensive the road is.

After the divorce, the parent who does not directly raise the children has the right to visit the children, and the other party has the obligation to assist. The method and time for exercising visitation rights are to be agreed upon by the parties; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment. Where a parent's visit to a child is detrimental to the child's physical and psychological health, the people's court is to suspend the visit in accordance with law; Visits shall be resumed after the reason for the suspension has disappeared.

The people's courts may lawfully employ compulsory measures such as detention and fines against relevant individuals or organizations that refuse to assist the other party in exercising visitation rights, but they cannot enforce the children's physical or visitation behavior.

[Legal basis].

Article 1086 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China After divorce, the parent who does not directly raise the children has the right to visit the children, and the other party has the obligation to assist. The method and time for exercising visitation rights are to be agreed upon by the parties; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment. Where a parent's visit to a child is detrimental to the child's physical and psychological health, the people's court is to suspend the visit in accordance with law; Visits shall be resumed after the reason for the suspension has disappeared.

After the divorce, the other party is not allowed to visit the children, and it is recommended that the two parties can negotiate to deal with it to avoid disputes affecting the healthy growth of the children.

If no agreement can be reached, then the parent who cannot access the child may file a lawsuit in court in accordance with the law to exercise his or her right to access the child.

At this time, the court will often make a judgment on the method and time of exercising the visitation right based on the interests of the child, and then ask the child's parents to assist in the enforcement.

After the divorce, although the relationship between the husband and wife has ended, the party who does not have guardianship of life still has the right to meet the children, which is legally called the right of visitation. Parents have the right to visit their children, but many parents will refuse to visit their children in order to avoid affecting their children, so how to avoid the other party from visiting their children after divorce? The law provides that if the court considers that the visit is a serious danger to the child's physical and mental health, it can refuse the visit.

The exercise of access rights should be in the best interests of the child, so that if the exercise of access rights is contrary to the best interests of the child, the exercise of access rights should be suspended or restricted. The legal reason for the suspension of visitation rights in Chinese mainland is "not conducive to the physical and mental health of the children", and in relevant foreign jurisprudence, it is often forbidden to meet and communicate on the grounds that it is contrary to the interests of the children. Of course, this kind of legislation fully embodies the "child-oriented" principle, ostensibly for the benefit of the children and conducive to the physical and mental health of the children.

However, if you think about it carefully, this may not be the case, and it is likely to lead to the abuse of the suspension of visitation rights. If it is not strictly restricted, the suspension of visitation at every turn will not only damage the visitation rights of the parent who does not directly raise the child, but may not be beneficial to the child, and it is difficult for us to make an absolute judgment that prohibiting the child from associating with one parent will be beneficial to the child's physical and mental health. In addition, the right of visitation is originally a right of parents after divorce, and although the exercise of this right should take into account the interests of the children and should be conducive to the healthy growth of the children, it is after all the right of the parents, and it is one of the main ways for the parents to keep in touch with the children after the divorce, understand the growth of the children, and educate the children.

In other words, the law should provide for a corresponding system for the restoration of visitation rights, which can better coordinate the relationship between the rights of parents and the protection of the best interests of children.

Dear, I hope mine can be helpful to you.

After the divorce, the other party also has the right to visit the child, but if one party makes a big mistake and does not bear the obligation to raise the child, or there are some other circumstances stipulated by law, the right to visit the child will be lost.

This is a no-no. It is not okay to not allow the other party to visit the children after a divorce. This is also not good for the child's physical and mental health. If one party does not allow access to the child, a lawsuit can be filed.

When divorcing, it is important to negotiate how often the other spouse can visit the children. After the negotiation is completed, it shall be implemented in accordance with the regulations. If one of the parties violates the provisions, it can sue the court for enforcement.

What should I do if the other party does not allow me to visit the children after the divorce.

After the divorce, the other party does not allow the children to visit, if there is an agreement at the time of divorce, and it is confirmed in the judgment, the right of visitation shall be exercised according to the determination of the judgment. If the other party does not cooperate, you can sue the court to enforce it.

The right of visitation, also known as the right to meet and communicate, refers to the right enjoyed by the parent who does not directly raise the child after the divorce to visit, contact, meet, socialize, and live together for a short period of time with the minor child. From a legal point of view, the right of visitation is a derivative right based on parental rights, and as long as the status relationship exists, the right of visitation should be the right of the party who is not directly raised.

If the judgment, mediation document or divorce agreement stipulates the child's visitation rights, but in the actual performance, one party or his parents refuse to allow the other party to exercise the visitation rights for various reasons, the party enjoying the visitation rights can communicate and negotiate through the local neighborhood committee, and if the negotiation fails, the party may file a lawsuit for infringement with the people's court on the premise of collecting relevant evidence.

However, it should be noted that court enforcement will generally only take measures to remove obstructions, and will not take compulsory measures against the child's person.

How to exercise visitation rights after a divorce.

The exercise of child visitation rights refers to the visit of the child by the party who indirectly supports the child after the divorce. The manner and timing of the visitation are generally agreed upon by the parents at the time of divorce. For the sake of the healthy growth of the children, both parties should negotiate the issue of children's visitation at the time of divorce, and make specific and detailed arrangements for the method and time of visitation.

Where the parties cannot reach an agreement on the visitation of the children at the time of divorce, the people's court shall make a judgment together when handling the divorce case. Generally, on the premise of not affecting the child's learning or seriously changing the child's life pattern, it is determined that the indirect supporter can communicate with the child alone for a period of time.

If the divorce judgment already made by the people's court does not involve the right to visitation of the children, and the parties file a separate lawsuit on the issue of visitation rights, the people's court shall accept it.

When the indirect supporter exercises the right of visitation, the parent who directly raises the child has an obligation to assist. If the parent who is directly raising the child does not fulfill his or her obligation to assist in visitation, or uses various means to prevent the other parent from realizing his or her visitation rights, the party with the right to visit may file a lawsuit with the people's court to realize his or her visitation rights.

For those who refuse to enforce judgments or rulings on child visits, the people's courts may take compulsory measures such as detention and fines against individuals and units that have an obligation to assist.

In the actual performance, if one party or his parents refuse to allow the other party to exercise the right of visitation for various reasons, the party enjoying the right of visitation may communicate and negotiate through the local neighborhood committee, and if the negotiation fails, it may file a lawsuit for infringement with the people's court on the premise of collecting relevant evidence.