On the question of the South China Tiger Photo, what is the South China Tiger Photo Incident

It is fake, the Chinese Photographers Association has identified it as fake, and the method of fraud is to put a tiger New Year painting in the forest for shooting, and even obviously shoot the surface reflection of the New Year painting, which is particularly fake.

** The TV station did a show and also thought it was fake.

The only institutions identified as true are local **!

The appraisers are all amateurs, and none of the zoologists are studying South China tigers, some are studying golden monkeys, and some are studying goldfish.

There is no doubt that it is fake, and Zhou is fooling people. All of the **, including the digital films, are obvious.

The official appraisal is actually an act of showing off power, which is obviously fake, and what I say is true is true, and you can't accept it. So there's no point in arguing with them, they said on the news broadcast 19 years ago that they still said that there were no dead people, do you believe it?

1. Which is more authentic and credible, the appraisal results of the China Photography Association or the appraisal results of the experts of the Forestry Bureau?

Answer: In fact, we can see the truth and falsehood at a glance, do we still need to bother with these big drivers?

2. Is Zhou Zhenglong fooling us?

Answer: It is Zhou Zhenglong who fools us. Zhou Zhenglong was also fooled.

3. Why did I intuitively tell me when I saw that tiger photo for the first time: it's fake! And the official appraisal is true.

A: Congratulations, that's because you are very honored to live in this **guo degree.

He has dozens of digital photographs and more than thirty film photographs, with negatives. You can't just look at a portrait.

I feel like it's fake, and my PS level should be more similar to Zhou Zhenglong's tiger.

The negative of the New Year's painting manufacturer has been found, and it has been verified that Zhou Zhenglong's ** is forged, and he is preparing to sue Zhou. The official appraisal only simply disclosed the preliminary results to **, and did not rely on accuracy, nor did it form a written report, and there has not been any official evidence at present. A positive answer can only be given after the case is formally concluded.

On October 12, 2007, the Shaanxi Forestry Department released the South China Tiger** photographed by hunter Zhou Zhenglong with a digital camera and a film camera. Subsequently, the authenticity of ** was questioned by some netizens, South China tiger experts and experts from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and aroused national attention.

On the 15th, netizens said that the tiger was a New Year's painting in its original form, and uploaded the New Year's painting to the Internet. Subsequently, Sichuan, Guangdong and other places successively found the same New Year paintings. At the same time, the producer of the New Year pictures showed an archived plate made in 2002.

Influenced by the New Year's paintings, the attitude of the "Tigers faction" began to waver, and hinted that there was a fake.

On November 25, NetEase exclusively ** a full set of "South China Tiger" digital **, presenting the core evidence of the incident to the public. Resources.