Is the own people effect in the workplace good or bad for enterprise construction?

The self-person effect in the workplace is definitely not good for the construction of the enterprise. Why? Because, if we have our own effect, everyone will only use their own people, there is no way to treat employees fairly and justly, and there are some better employees because they are not their own people, so they cannot be reused, which will lead to the loss of a large number of talents.

And because they will only use their own people, the team will slowly become corrupt and incompetent. It's a fatal blow to businesses. Therefore, the effect of one's own people in the workplace is very bad for enterprise construction, thank you!

If you often use your own people in this case, then the benefits will definitely not be good, because using your own people is a kind of nepotism, which will lead to no way to work normally, and may even lead to the ultimate failure of some work, so many people are easy to cause when there is no distinction between public and private. Some of my own discomfort is very bad for my own business. Because of the use of their own people, many jobs will be procrastinated, and even embarrassed to talk about their own people, resulting in no way to do their own work.

A company still needs to use people you don't know, or talented people, these people can give you a good job, and using your own words will only make your business fall into passivity.

The one-person effect in the workplace is definitely not good for the construction of enterprises. Because for the construction of enterprises, management is inconvenient, which will lead to family management.

The effect of one's own people in the workplace is not good for the construction of enterprises, because there are many things that can be relaxed, so it is better to use outsiders, and it is easy for one's own people to relax the conditions.

Not good, because the effect of one's own people in the workplace may prevent the entry of new ideas in the enterprise, which is not conducive to the innovation and development of the enterprise. So it's not good.

The "own people" effect in the workplace is not good for enterprise construction, is not conducive to enterprise management, and is not conducive to the development of enterprise construction. Therefore, the people in the workplace are not conducive to the construction of the enterprise.

The effect of one's own people in the workplace is still not good for the construction of the enterprise, because it will cause some values and ideas to tend to be the same, which is not conducive to the development of the company's business and some development.

The self-person effect in the workplace is not good for the construction of enterprises. Because if an enterprise wants to develop for a long time, it does not rely on a kind of favor and relationship, but on the strength and brand of its own enterprise, as well as good pregnancy and competition.

Hello. Personally, I think it's not good, because the "own people" in the workplace belong to gangs, which will form a bad atmosphere in the company, and it will also have a great impact on the company's management system, which is not conducive to the unity of the company! It's not good for the construction of the enterprise!

Therefore, I personally think that the "own people" effect in the workplace is not good for enterprise construction! Hope it helps, hope, thank you!

The self-person effect in the workplace is not good for enterprise construction. This method is not conducive to the management of enterprises and the unification of enterprises.

Not good; The construction of the enterprise focuses on cultural construction, and there should not be its own people in the workplace, but according to the system and according to the assessment to motivate employees. On the contrary, their own people will affect the execution of the enterprise, affect the construction of corporate culture, and are not conducive to the long-term development of the enterprise.

Not good; In the final analysis, their own people are small groups of individuals in the enterprise, and this small group does not consider the interests of the company, but how to obtain their own interests, such a team has no future for development, and it is also a kind of damage to the construction of the company.

Personally, I think that the effect of one's own people in the workplace is not very good for the construction of the enterprise, because of the words of one's own people, many times it is difficult to manage conveniently due to the situation, and it is easy to cause a bad impact among the employees, so I personally suggest that it is best not to choose one's own people in the construction of the enterprise, and should try to choose a little fairer, more just, and a little more open.

Personally, I think it should be bad. First, the construction of the enterprise depends on the system, relying on the corporate culture, which is the foundation of the long-term development of the enterprise, there is no corporate cohesion, and second, the effect of their own people leads to too much human touch, and not fair enough, there is no cohesion at all.

I think the reason why the effect of one's own people in the workplace is not good for the construction of the enterprise, it is very simple, if you are nepotistic, many times you recruit some abilities, not as good as your own people, one is to make yourself particularly tired, the other is that the enterprise will not have much development, if the meritocracy, we do not engage in our own effect, we are engaged in if you have the ability to do this, it is likely to create a great enterprise, so in the workplace the effect of one's own people is not good for enterprise construction. Represents personal views only.

The oneself-person effect in the workplace is definitely not good for enterprise construction, because this effect gives us the feeling that using interpersonal relationships to buy good relationships between enterprises is definitely not conducive to normal enterprise construction. So I don't think it's good.

The one-person effect in the workplace is definitely not good for the company.

The effect of one's own people in the workplace will make many capable people leave slowly, which is not conducive to the future development of the enterprise.

In the same way, the effect of one's own people in the workplace will cause the enterprise to form a gang, which is not conducive to the standardized management of the enterprise, and the same makes the enterprise lose its sense of competition and only care about its own gang.

The effect of one's own people in the workplace will also cause misunderstanding between leaders, which is not conducive to mutual cooperation, so that all aspects of instructions are delayed, thus affecting the company's efficiency.

Therefore, the self-person effect in the workplace is very bad for the company.

The "own people" effect in the workplace is not good for enterprise construction, because the "own people" effect is essentially a manifestation of small group gathering, which is not conducive to the unity and fair competition of enterprises, so it is not conducive to enterprise construction.

I think the effect of one's own people in the workplace is not good for the construction of the enterprise, if it is the beginning of the career, at that time the enterprise has not been bigger, if you have your own people in the early stage of the business, it may be beneficial to the enterprise, if in the long run, if the enterprise wants to have a big development, if there are your own people, it is not good for the enterprise, it will form nepotism, or your decision-making will be affected by your own people, and even will be prone to many contradictions, hindering the development of the enterprise.

The self-person effect in the workplace is not good for the company. Because if there is selfishness, there will be disadvantages, and if there are disadvantages, it will be harmful. Everyone creates their own circles. This is very detrimental to the business. There is even a suspicion of malpractice.

The self-person effect in the workplace is definitely not good for the construction of the enterprise, which will only put it. The fact that one's own business becomes a family is not conducive to the management of the enterprise.

This is not good for ordinary working people. Because, because of the backdoor relationship, the position that I have worked hard for a long time is gone, and I lack motivation and enthusiasm for work. This has an impact on the development of the company.

However, their own people can know more about the roots and can entrust many things, but they also have to exercise from the grassroots level in order to harvest the hearts of employees and better for the construction of enterprises!

The "own people" effect in the workplace is beneficial to enterprise construction. Can become a backbone and play an important role in critical moments. Therefore, if it is a joint-stock investment enterprise, it should cultivate its own people, which is beneficial to the construction of the enterprise.

It's good, it can speed up integration, and it can help new comrades adapt, but as for the back, when it matures, then everyone has their own personal judgment, and it can't just rely on fooling.

The self-effect in the workplace is actually not very good for the construction of temper, because if you think that this is your own person, many times there are some problems that you dare not blame, because considering the face of others, my business is not impossible to go, then in this way, in fact, let the people in the workplace not enter. It is not beneficial to the development of a company. And the self-person effect in the workplace.

It doesn't make a more advantageous person stand out. Let's do it this way. In the process of construction, enterprises cannot tap talents.

Well, I think that the self-person effect in the workplace is not good for the construction of the enterprise, which is not conducive to the development of the enterprise.

The own people in the workplace are not good for the construction of the enterprise, because they are their own people, so some small problems are easier to get by, and there will even be a scene of supporting each other, so the effect of their own people in the workplace is not good for the construction of the enterprise.

In the workplace"own people"The effect is not good for the construction of the whole enterprise. Small circles and small gangs are not conducive to the unity of the entire enterprise team, and will make everyone lose their enthusiasm for work. And if there is a leader"own people"Such a concept would be unfair and would not be able to discriminate equally.

I think that the effect of one's own people in the workplace is generally not good for enterprise construction, and it accounts for a little more of it. The so-called own person is a person who the other person puts you and him in the same category. That is to say, in order to make the other person accept your point of view and attitude, you should not hesitate to maintain a relationship with the other person, that is, you should see the other person as one with yourself.

There is a good saying, natural selection, survival of the fittest. This is also the case in the workplace, we can only survive better by adapting to the workplace and integrating into the internal environment. An important element of the workplace, in addition to work ability, is naturally the internal social relationship.

Therefore, it is very necessary for us in the mixed workplace to deal with internal relationships.

The effect of one's own people in the workplace is definitely not good, it is not conducive to management, and it has formed a kind of atmosphere of gangs. It has a great impact on the future construction of enterprise planning. In short, there is no symbol of solidarity for cohesion.

This kind of behavior can achieve good results in the short term, such as a strong sense of teamwork, high efficiency of business implementation, and reduced management costs.

However, in the long run, a small hill effect will be formed, which means that this group of people will form a certain force in the enterprise, and begin to focus on their own interests and squeeze out other people who do not like them, which makes it difficult for the company to control. The result is that if these people go, the company will lose a lot in the short term, and if they don't go, it will be difficult for the company to develop.

So try to avoid such behavior.

In this way, the power is all on the management side, so the controllability of the enterprise is not strong, as the boss, you have to be cautious!

Whether it is their own people is just a superficial phenomenon, the key is to look at the intentions behind it, if out of selfishness, to build their own small team, it will be harmful, do not avoid relatives, their own people's work ability is more competent than others can be used.

Economically, individualism argues that everyone should be allowed to make his or her own economic decisions, and opposes interference by the state or the social community. At the same time, individualism also supports the freedom of individuals to own property and opposes arrangements by the state or group. Such an economic system is often referred to as "laissez-faire" or "capitalism".

Critics of modern capitalism, on the other hand, argue that capitalism is not rooted in individuals, but in corporations and institutions, and that the role of individuals is largely determined by these institutions. However, in contrast to other forms of political collectivism, capitalism is often thought of as an individualistic system because participation in such a system is voluntary and individual choice. However, capitalism does work in some collectivist societies, with the only difference:

Whether this is an individual or a group.

Individualism is a moral, political, and social philosophy that believes that personal interests should be the most important determinant of behavior, emphasizing the importance of individual freedom and individual rights, as well as the "virtue of self-independence" and "personal independence". Individualism rebels against authority and all attempts to control individuals – especially those imposed by the state or society on coercive forces. Individualism is therefore a direct counterpoint to collectivism that places the status of the individual under society or community.

Individualism is often confused with egoism, but in fact individualism is not the same as egoism, which is also a constituent element of classical liberalism.

In life and work, it is the most difficult to deal with, but if it is handled properly, the greatest effect is often interpersonal relationships. Build your circle of relationships with sincerity and service. Good interpersonal relationships make work a difference.

Happiness, promote teamwork, enhance corporate cohesion, and improve work efficiency. To treat others with oneself, to think about others with oneself, to know how to empathize with others in the work, and try to think from the perspective of others. Building good interpersonal relationships and creating a harmonious team atmosphere can often make the work more effective with half the effort.

The herd effect is immediately related to the completion of one's own work and the development trend of the company, which brings the way for successful people to move towards higher completion, and also points the way for those who fail to surpass those who are unsuccessful.

These people who do not have a development plan, a construction plan, and a positive attitude are prone to fall into the negative information circulation system in the process of development, and the situation will become more and more compact and unable to improve; And these people who have a total goal from the beginning, have a plan, and have a positive and motivated psychological state, even if they encounter some difficulties, they can also eliminate obstacles according to continuous diligence, turn into butterflies, and develop from a better and better angle. That polarization is, in fact, a herd effect in career development.

The most obvious harm to personal development caused by the herd effect is the chain reaction it causes. When my career development is not very good, the resources, service platforms and connections I have touched are becoming more and more scarce, and it is difficult to make a difference in personal development when environmental factors, standards and resources are increasingly lacking.

If you put this into the internal investigation of Dongwang, you will find that the herd effect is more pronounced in the larger the company. In addition to the immeasurable difference between the salaries of the employees and the technical backbone of the business process and the peripheral units and auxiliary staff, the resources, promotion opportunities, development trends, service platforms, and personal relationships are also very different.

In order to prevent the herd effect from adversely affecting one's career planning, it is necessary to move forward bravely.

The first is to establish a career choice and shape a clear overall goal.

The second is to get good resources and a good service platform according to their own diligence and promotion.

Third, it is necessary to turn a good attitude into a gold-absorbing tripod of good luck.

Some professionals unusually think that they can protect themselves by staying improvised. In fact, it is difficult to participate in the allocation of high-quality resources, and it is difficult to develop without good resources, and after all, it will not be able to escape the fortune of going out.

If you want to have a bright future, the only thing you can rely on is yourself, so you should have a precise positioning for yourself, and you must understand the development goals of your daily life.