Is it reasonable for the son to have all the real estate deposits, and the daughter has no share in

What is reasonable and what is unreasonable? First of all, don't care if you are a daughter, then since you were born, your parents raised you so big, that is to say, you are pregnant in October.

Conceive in October, and then raise you until you are 20 years old, alimony to your parents.

Can't it? Another aspect is not as good as, for example, the distribution of homestead land in rural areas.

As long as the son reaches the age of 18, then the village committee will move you out of the homestead, so even if the daughter is 50 years old, you are not married, and you will not give you the homestead, that is to say, there is such a rule in the village, can it be said that your family can give you points? Is it divided into homesteads? So sometimes it's not so much to say, it's not easy for your parents to support you, and you should support your parents, from ancient times to the present, customs and habits are like this, and there is no way, because you get married, then the child you give birth to must be your husband's, it is impossible to believe your mother's money, even if you enter the ancestral grave, you can't enter the ancestral grave, so you can only belong to the man's family, let you pay a little alimony, I think it should be.

Of course, this is reasonable, they gave you life, then you have to support your parents. The property is people's own, and they can give it to whoever they want.

The parents leave all their property to their son, but they ask their daughter for alimony. Parents have the right to dispose of personal property, while children have a legal obligation to support their elders.

Legal basis: Article 26 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China provides that parents have the obligation to raise, educate and protect their minor children.

Adult children have an obligation to their parents to support, support and protect them.

Article 1123.

After the commencement of inheritance, it shall be handled in accordance with the statutory inheritance; If there is a will, it shall be handled in accordance with the testamentary inheritance or bequest; Where there is a bequest and maintenance agreement, it shall be handled in accordance with the agreement.

Of course, there is an obligation to support, no matter who your parents give your property to, you are the son of your parents, and you need to bear the obligation of support. It's just that the daughter has more benefits, and at the moral level, the daughter should bear a little more, but this is not stipulated by law. It does not affect the son's maintenance obligations.

There is an obligation to support.

Although it is said that the father's actions are inappropriate, in the eyes of the law, it is the freedom of the family.

And your obligation to support your parents is a legal obligation with no strings attached. Because starting from the most simple humanistic feelings, your parents raised your young, you should raise them old, and raising them old is to repay the kindness of raising you in the past, not because you have to inherit the property of the old man because you raised your parents old.

If you think this way, then parents who have no property do not deserve to live in this world?

The father gave all the property to his daughter, and the son did not get the property and property. But you are still father and son, and you still have the obligation to provide for the elderly. He gave birth to you and raised him young. Property and possessions are negotiable for your family.

Yes. The father gives the property and property to the daughter, and the son also has an obligation to support him. The law stipulates that children have the obligation to support the elderly and cannot fail to fulfill the obligation to support them because they do not have access to property.

According to the principle of fairness, rights and duties are commensurate, and the more property a daughter receives from her parents, the more obligations she bears.

Hello. It is a legal duty and responsibility for a child to support his or her parents, regardless of whether or not he inherits property.

Even if the parents are at fault for abandoning the child, the child has a maintenance obligation to the parent.

Whether a son has an obligation to support depends on whether the father has fulfilled his obligation to support his son when he is growing up.

If the father has support, but the distribution of property is unreasonable, then the son still has to support, after all, it is good to take care of it for decades.

The father gave all the real estate and property to the women's banquet hall, and the son still had the obligation to support him. Because the obligation of maintenance is not linked to the division of property, it is not exempted because of the non-distribution of property, which is based on the hidden line of blood or adoption.

The father gave all the real estate and the property to his daughter before he was buried, and the son also had to do his duty to support the righteous cong liquid, who is the freedom of the parents to give the property? However, it is the duty of children to support the elderly.

When the son is hungry and has the obligation to support us, the parents raised us, of course they are the children to support when they are old, and the father gives all his property to his daughter, and the father must have the idea of disrupting himself, which is also his personal will, and it has nothing to do with support.

The old man's real estate and property are given to the state regardless of the ruler, who has a high reputation? That's the right of the elderly, although the son didn't get anything, but you still have to support your father, because this is your obligation, if you are not kind, then you are breaking the law, it is his duty for the father to support the child, and it is also your duty for the child to support the father, and the property has nothing to do with it.

The father gives all the property and property to the daughter, and the son also has the responsibility and obligation to support the father. Since all the property and property owned by the father is owned by the father, he has the right to distribute the property of the person who disturbs the person, so the maintenance of the elderly has nothing to do with the property, and you have the responsibility and obligation to support the father at all times.

The father gave all his property and possessions to his daughter. Is the son still obligated to support? Of course.

According to the law, children have a maintenance feast. Parental Obligations. In other words, there is no condition for supporting one's father and mother.

It must be borne by itself.

If the father gives all his property and property to his daughter, does the son still have an obligation to support him? You are my son, you will always be your father's son, you have the obligation to support your father, your father gave all the property and property to his daughter, he has his reason, but your obligation to support the rent and rubber is not taken off, as the saying goes, a good woman does not fight for marriage, a good son does not fight for family property, your father gave the family property to you, gave it to your sisters, you must understand your father's hard work, you have to cheer yourself up, you have to fight yourself, you have to fight yourself, you have to fight your own country, Don't rely on the elderly.

Since the father gave all the property to his daughter for the mother's pension, how can he praise the deeds of the woman and the daughter to bear all of you, this is from the human feelings, morally speaking, if from the legal point of view, regardless of whether the property is involved, the girl and son should support the elderly, this is the righteousness and disadvantage of every child. There must be a reason for his situation, why did the father give all the property to his daughter and not to the son, it must be that the relationship between the son's father is not very good, well, this is also not right, no matter what, the son must be the son, the old man must be the old man, well, the father should not give all the property to the daughter. The son shouldn't be handsome, and the father is wrong in both ways.

Legally, no matter who the father gives his property to, the children have the obligation to support, so even if the father gives all the property and property to the daughter, the son also has the obligation to support him.

The father gave all his property to his daughter, no matter who he buried it in. The party that did not give also had the support of the old man. The son was not given a house and property.

But you are still father and son, and you still have the obligation to provide for the elderly. He gave birth to you, and you raised him to be filial to the old. Property and possessions are negotiable for your family.

First of all, you need to understand what the maintenance obligation is.

The distribution of parental property is not directly related to the maintenance obligation.

The following regulations are for your reference:

1. Maintenance obligor.

1. The child who bears the obligation of support must be an adult child. It can be a person who is at least 18 years old and has the ability to do civil work, or a person who is at least 16 years old and under 18 years old but who uses his own economic income as his main livelihood.

2. Adult children must have lived independently, and adult children who have no economic income and are unable to live independently without labor force are not obligors. Although adult children without financial income may be exempted from the obligation to support, they shall also fulfill the obligation to support.

2. What are the conditions for parents to enjoy the right to be supported?

1. Not every parent needs to be supported by surplus, and only when the circumstances stipulated in the law are met, such as: loss of ability to work, no economic income or income insufficient to maintain the basic living standard of the local area.

2. Parents who are unable to work or have difficulties in living have the right to sue the court to require their children to fulfill their obligations when they fail to fulfill their maintenance obligations.

There is an obligation, and the father has the right to dispose of the father's property and property, which has nothing to do with the omission of the righteous idea of maintenance. However, daughters also have the right and duty to support their fathers. It is advisable to ask the brother and sister to negotiate and deal with it. Suggested by netizens, for reference only. Good luck!

Of course, there is an obligation to support. Empathy, your parents raised you since childhood, and that is also the obligation of your parents.

Don't be full of money in your eyes, you are afraid that you have lost your family affection.

There must be a reason why your father's behavior is inappropriate, and you also have the wrong way to destroy the diqin, you can negotiate with your sister or sister to reduce the cost of maintenance.

Legally, morally, it depends on what the father gave his property to his daughter, if you are at fault, then negotiate with the father, who owns the property and who supports him, if he does not agree, it will be resolved through litigation and mediation in the court.

The father gave all the property and property to his daughter, which means that your son is not good? Let your father be completely disappointed in you, that's why you do it.

Although the father gave all the property to his daughter, legally speaking, your son still has the obligation to support, and it is illegal not to support him.

There is still a need to support the elderly, but the degree of contribution may not be so much. It is an obligation but not absolute, and in general, in such a situation, the son also has to support the elderly, but the proportion may be very small.

If this is what you say, then you can offer not to support your parents. It's not that I want my parents' money, it's that my parents are too partial, since you don't treat me as a son, then I can propose not to support you. Whoever gets your property and property is maintained.

It is impossible for a daughter to get all the old man's property without supporting her parents, which is intolerable. Although the son did not get the old man's property, he could still go to see the old man when he had time.

If the father gives all the property and property to the daughter, then the son still has the obligation to maintain him. This maintenance obligation is not about the property and property, but about the relationship between them.

From a legal point of view, children have the obligation and responsibility to support their parents, which has nothing to do with the fact that parents give all their property to their sons and daughters, and they also have to bear this obligation if they do not get property.

If the father has given all his property and property to his daughter, does the son still have an obligation to pay respects? According to the law, the son has an obligation to pay respect, and the son should also have a share in the father's property.

If the father gives all his property to his daughter without the son's consent, then the father's pension and the daughter will have to bear all the responsibility, and the son can have an obligation, but no task.

The obligation to maintain is not related to the division of property, and even if the father gives the property to his daughter, the son also has the obligation to support his parents.

Although the father gave all his property and possessions to his daughter. At that time, I became a son. There is still an obligation to support. After all, it's the father's. Biological son.

Legal Analysis: Children have an obligation to support their parents. From a legal point of view, regardless of whether the parents give property or not, they must support their parents.

Therefore, for patriarchal parents, daughters can only communicate well, so that parents realize the harm caused by their unfairness to their daughters, and according to the law, children have the obligation to support.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 26: Parents have the obligation to raise, educate, and protect their minor children. Adult children have an obligation to their parents to support, support and protect them.

Article 37: Parents, children, spouses, and so forth who bear the guardian's child support, alimony, or maintenance expenses in accordance with law shall continue to perform their obligation to bear the burden after the people's court has their guardianship qualifications revoked.

Article 196:The statute of limitations does not apply to the following claims: (1) requests to stop the violation, remove obstacles, or eliminate dangers; (2) The owner of the immovable property right and the registered movable property right requests the return of the property; (3) Requests for the payment of child support, alimony, or alimony; (4) Other claims to which the statute of limitations does not apply in accordance with law.

Men and women have equal inheritance rights, and adult children have an obligation to support their parents. Property cannot be given only to the son, nor can it be given only to the daughter.

Legal basis. Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 26: Parents have the obligation to raise, educate, and protect their minor children. Adult children have an obligation to their parents to support, support and protect them.

Article 1123: After the commencement of inheritance, it shall be handled in accordance with the statutory succession; If there is a will, it shall be handled in accordance with the testamentary inheritance or bequest; Where there is a bequest and maintenance agreement, it shall be handled in accordance with the agreement.

Article 1126:Men and women are equal in inheritance rights.

Everyone has their own opinion on this issue, and I think both rural and urban people. Their ideas are all different and the same, for example, there is a custom in the countryside, it is indeed a married girl, like water spilled out, then divide the property of the mother's family, that is you, it doesn't matter, than the rural homestead when the boy can give him a homestead after the age of 18, and the girl is called no, that is to say, there is no way, there is no way to do it, that is, you inherit the property of your mother's family, it is impossible. For example, if your mother's surname is Zhang, then the daughter-in-law who marries someone has a child is surnamed Zhang, then the child born after you get married will definitely not be surnamed Zhang, because your surname is that the child born to your family gave birth to the man's surname, so it is said that your mother's property should be left to someone surnamed Zhang, and it is impossible to leave it to a family with a foreign surname.

In fact, there is this custom in China, and it has been like this from ancient times to the present, and there is no way to do it. As a girl, then your parents gave birth to you and raised you in your 20s, then you bully and share your parents' specialties, then I think you are going to marry someone else, so the child you give birth to is not like your mother's surname, and you divide the property in the south, I think it is really not appropriate, then your parents raise you so much, you pay some alimony, this is also okay, not to say that it should not be, do you think that from the birth of you to your 20s, then how much pork did he spend, how many troops? I really don't want you to know sooner or later, because you have a child, and you also know that it is not easy to raise a child, from the child's school to the tuition fee, food, clothing and housing, this is all given to you by your parents, so say some child support, I think it is also very normal, on the other hand, you can think about it, if you divide the property from your mother's family, then your sister-in-law, when the time comes, go back to her mother's house, back to your family's property, are you willing?

So this is a truth, that is to say, your mother's family will not give you a pat, then your family will not give you sister-in-law's property, I think this is also very good, save your property on both sides, for example, you inherit your mother's property, your husband wants to inherit, mother-in-law's property, then you think well, the property inheritance on both sides,