Why is the encyclopedia full of mistakes and omissions, and what liars say is always full of mistake

Because the encyclopedia is all netizens, it is normal to make a little mistake, and you can also modify it yourself.

Encyclopedias can be created by anyone, and there is no hierarchy limit.

The steps to create one are as follows:

1. Open the official website of the encyclopedia first and click the Create Entry button on the right.

2. Enter the name of the entry and continue.

3. Write the content in the blank space and set the directory.

4. Add references and open categories. (The reference materials are very important, it is recommended to use the reports of large portals, the reports of **institutions, and the others are not authoritative for encyclopedias!) ）

5. The last step is to submit the entry.

Because the main body is netizens, some netizens really dare not compliment, which has created an uneven level of encyclopedia entries. Some of them go back with a half-understanding, and write a four-way smile and generosity; some add private goods with ulterior motives to deliberately mislead the public; Some lack the spirit of rigorous verification and correct the original correct content.

Domestic encyclopedias cannot be trusted, whether it is an encyclopedia or other encyclopedias. are not credible, and some specialize in using encyclopedias to mislead people's children. Some terms can be referenced, and some are not even of reference value.

If you have questions, don't read the encyclopedia. To find the sea of words in reality, the editor-in-chief Xia Zhengnong. Much more reliable than encyclopedia. Encyclopedia can't be trusted.

The boss of Yunru Ke on behalf of the encyclopedia service provider is very professional, the encyclopedia is very good, and it was completed soon after giving him the information, and some of the problems that I think are more difficult have been solved for me, and the cloud Ruke on behalf of the encyclopedia service provider has also added **, and added some content, I will come to you later if I have to do it.

I don't know, what is the reason now, I think my knowledge is right?

There is actually a certain convenience of online learning. He checked very quickly. Learning to look up information in real life is too slow.

Except for the entries of professional institutions in the encyclopedia, they are locked. Everything else can be modified. To modify an entry, you must first register as a member.

Then do tasks to level up. Depending on the level, the permission to modify the term is different. When a term is amended, the review body will review it, and if the review is passed, the change will be considered successful.

The next time you open this entry, you can see the modified entry.

So, if you see an entry that is incorrect, you can modify it.

Encyclopedia is available to everyone, which is why this happens. In such a situation, you should raise the version of the entry for the Xiang Bao to shout.

In addition, it is a good idea to bring in an expert, but who will pay for the cost?

This is understandable, after all, the level of people is uneven. Therefore, if you want to really understand history, you should still recommend reading some more professional historical works, and if you want to do this, the level is higher and there are fewer mistakes.

What do you say? If you think that place is incorrect, you can leave a message to the official or encyclopedia, and there is an error correction mechanism to correct the error. There are many problems that are worse than the best, and it is inevitable that there will be mistakes. If the anti-Qing coarse should go to the official, it can solve the problem.

The entries on the encyclopedia can be modified freely, and there will inevitably be many deficiencies, if you feel bad, you can modify it yourself.

In the encyclopedia, except for the entry of the professional machine belt construction, it is locked. Everything else can be modified. To modify the entries, you must first register as a member.

Then do tasks to level up. Depending on the level of Zhilu, the permission to modify the entry is different. When an entry is amended, the review body will review it, and if the review is passed, the change will be considered successful.

The above entries can be modified personally.,Some people also run to the chain to check and modify it when they know a little bit about it.,Mistakes will definitely occur.,You can call the rotation or modify it yourself.,I hope to strengthen the detection of this aspect in the future.。

This is indeed a big question, and many entries are not made up by professionals, so it makes a loophole for some people. A review mechanism should be established for the experts to roll the eggplant, and if the audit is not passed, it should not be released.

In fact, people who really understand history don't do entries at all, and if you have that stupidity and time regrets, it's better to write a book that has a greater impact, so the dust encyclopedia can be used as a reference.

The encyclopedia brothers are all stupid by netizens. Unreliable. FYI, the so-called, "big guy". Tadpole clusters, also unreliable. The big guy is also envious of the amateur. Tadpole regiments are not academics. If there is a problem, go to the sea of words in reality, and the sea of words in reality.

Please specify the problem, such as which specific sentences are inappropriate, what specific content needs to be modified, what banquet lead content needs to be modified into, what are the reference materials, sort these out, and then send it to the encyclopedia tadpole group post bar, where the big guys gather, there will be someone to help you answer the block, of course, the premise is to speak well and express your demands reasonably. Remember personal attacks.

This is really not necessarily, if there are many mistakes and omissions, then can he still deceive people. Don't underestimate the wisdom and linguistic logic of **. They are all clever tongues, they can turn straw into gold bars, say so that you can't help but believe it, say it to make you doubt life, and as a result, you fall for it.

Because people are looking for fun online.

Most of them are in a playful mindset.

So it's good to be happy.

It's normal to like it indiscriminately.

That's why.

This is not a textbook, so why bother, just poke at the approval of others.

There are people who don't have a level, and they are not as talented as you.

Followers only know that they blindly follow the herd and do not ask the facts.

Operate. Team. Control, topic.

Maybe only a few people are like you.

Maybe it's wonderful, and the flaws are not hidden.

Not official, all kinds of domestic encyclopedias, full of errors and loopholes? There are not one or two wrong loopholes, but thousands of them. There are also careerists who use encyclopedias to mislead people's children.

Domestic encyclopedia: (, Sogou, 360, interactive, etc., right?) I can't believe it.

There's no such thing as a free lunch. There must be something wrong with the free lunch of the wheel. You people, who don't spend money and want to see authoritative, objective, impartial, and academic materials, how can you carry them.

You are greedy for convenience, unwilling to spend money, unwilling to bother, unwilling to look up information in reality. You just read the encyclopedia, right?

There are many inauthoritative mistakes and loopholes. If you open the history of the Encyclopedia of 100 systems, you will find an entry, which can be hundreds of times thousands of times. Is this kind of entry still authoritative?

The quality of the person is not high, and there is no academic ethics and academic conscience. There are also some social scum, people with ulterior motives, who specialize in encyclopedias and mislead people's children. Spread misinformation, in short, just refer to it, don't dare to take it as the truth.

It is important to distinguish between parts of the same entry that are more objective. Part of it is moisture. Pay attention to discernment.

DAO students are responsible, good.

The problem is that you don't have the authority of the teacher here, and the folk science and philosophers like elementary school students like them like to play war with you. Further, it's not wrong to say that what these things say, but it's just out of tune or unimportant. Either it's ordinary and true, or it's all kinds of fake, you really want something profound, and it's an accurate expression of profound content, then it's better to try to read academic works or English wikis or sep or related materials (many people should be able to share their slides and notes online), so why bother with this kind of place?

Domestic bai various encyclopedias, error du

There are many loopholes, and there are not one or two wrong loopholes, but tens of thousands of daos. Expert.

There are also some cases where ambitious families use encyclopedias to mislead people's children. Domestic encyclopedias can't believe that there is no free lunch in the world. There must be something wrong with having a free lunch.

How is it possible for you people who want to see authoritative, objective, impartial, and academic materials without spending money. You are greedy for convenience, unwilling to spend money, unwilling to work hard, and unwilling to look up information in reality. You just read the encyclopedia, right?

A lot of the information in the encyclopedia has references.

Do you feel that you can't always answer the idea of the question, or you don't understand it comprehensively, so you will deviate from the topic?

The second step is to carefully review the question and conduct directional scanning.

The key to doing the subjective questions of modern reading is to examine the questions accurately, and if you grasp the key to reviewing the questions, you will find the trick to answering the questions. The examination of modern reading is to carefully analyze the question stem and grasp the requirements of the question, that is, to grasp the various information related to the answer contained in the question stem.

The third step is to screen the combination and express it in a targeted manner.

The reading of literary works is mostly subjective, and its question stem can not only show the area where the question is answered, but also the way in which the question is answered. It is necessary to answer the question from the perspective of the propositioner's "question", and answer what is asked, so that the answer is sufficient, in place, accurate and organized. When integrating, it is important to ensure that the text is coherent.

Keep in mind: 1. Find out the attitudes or tendencies in the stem.

2. Clarify the composition form of the question stem language and determine the language form of the answer.

3. Find out what the author says and what the proposer says in the stem.

4. Change implicit to direct, and change to generalize.

5. Screen, refine, and integrate sentences from the original text to answer.