-
It depends.
At present, there are few students enrolled in science, and the chance of entering an undergraduate is 99%; Liberal arts are highly competitive, 50%.
If you do well in liberal arts and science, choose science or make your own.
If you are average in arts and sciences, choose science;
If you are good at science, choose science;
If you are worthless, you should choose science.
Because I chose science, it is easier to change to liberal arts in the future, but after choosing liberal arts, it is not impossible to change to science, but it is very troublesome.
From a utilitarian point of view, there is no doubt that it is science, and here's why:
1.The number of students enrolled in science is much larger, and there is a place for basically any score.
2.There are very few liberal arts students recruited by universities, even fewer good liberal arts universities, and the range of career choices after graduation is quite narrow, there are basically no units to recruit liberal arts students, basically only news, newspapers, secretaries and other liberal arts students, and journalism and newspapers are difficult to squeeze into, I don't want to be a secretary, right?
3.Can you go to college without studying science? Joke, the hard life of liberal arts students is that after going to college, advanced mathematics, chemistry foundation, physics foundation, engineering mechanics, linear mathematics, electronic technology, 、、、 these super science courses are not divided into majors, regardless of the basic courses of arts and sciences, as long as they go to college, they have to deal with them within the freshman and sophomore years, and they can't get a graduation certificate in any of them, and liberal arts students will be tired to death.
4.Some people say that liberal arts rely on endorsement, that must be a child who has no similar experience, liberal arts require strong logical analysis skills, the same historical materials are very different in different places, and the current high schools are generally lame, and there are very few liberal arts high schools with strong liberal arts education ability.
-
This needs to be determined by your own preferences.
-
The future of the scholar of literature must be managed by others, and the future of the scholar of science must be managed by others.
-
It's better to study liberal arts, because liberal arts have to think about where a problem can extend. Although science also needs to be considered, there is only one answer for more than 85% of science subjects, such as 1+1=2
-
The biggest difference between arts and sciences lies in the difference between knowledge and thinking, different thinking has different lives, whether it is speaking or doing, or considering problems. We can't simply say whether the liberal arts are better or the sciences are better, the question is like the question of whether an open book is beneficial or not.
Take liberal arts as an example, there are many benefits, such as: people who study liberal arts can speak well, have a wide range of knowledge, and have strong communication skills; It is more conducive to the formation of independent thinking and the ability to distinguish between right and wrong. It is difficult to develop this ability by deriving mathematical theorems, doing physics experiments or designing circuit diagrams, but more by summarizing and accumulating in the humanities (such as learning from history).
Make yourself a more interesting person. Learning more about liberal arts, such as reading literature books, learning painting, movie appreciation, etc., can make you less rigid and interesting, and often make your life more fun.
In fact, whether it is liberal arts or science, the most important thing is to study well, and everything is nonsense if you don't learn well. In learning, you must learn to set goals for yourself (big, small, long, short), so that there will be a direction for learning; Then we must learn to sort out our own learning situation, based on textbooks, combined with the notes we have made, test papers, weak links we have mastered, existing problems, etc., reasonably allocate time, and target and specific to overcome and implement little by little.
You can learn to master the ability of speed reading and memorization, and improve the efficiency of learning and review. Speed reading and memorization is an efficient learning and review method, and its training principle is to activate the potential of "brain and eye" and cultivate the formation of eye-brain direct reflection reading and learning mode. For the practice of speed reading memory, see "Elite Special Whole Brain Speed Reading Memory Training", practice with software, more than an hour a day, a month's time, you can double the reading speed, memory, attention, thinking, comprehension, etc. will also be improved accordingly, and ultimately improve the efficiency of learning and review, and achieve good results.
If your reading and learning efficiency is low, you can practice it well.
Learn to integrate knowledge points. Classify the information you need to learn and the knowledge you need to master, and make it into a mind map or knowledge point card, which will make your brain and thinking clear and easy to remember, review, and master. At the same time, learn to connect new knowledge with what you have already learned, and constantly integrate and improve your knowledge system.
This promotes understanding and strengthens memory.
When doing problems, you should learn to reflect, classify, and sort out the corresponding solution ideas. When you encounter the wrong questions (carelessly do it wrong, you can't do it), it is best to collect these wrong questions, and each subject has an independent set of mistakes (the set of mistakes should be classified), and when we review before the exam, they are the key review objects to ensure that there are no more mistakes and points on the same questions.
It is suitable for students aged 0 8 to enroll in the study, and the most distinctive feature is the curriculum of the institution. >>>More
If you want to turn the tables on these two heroes, you have to look at your own strength Relatively speaking, VN is better AKL meets a strong one on the line Basically pressed to death Even wandering can finish suppressing AKL That is to say, AKL is a hero who wants to pick up heads and develop No head Under the same equipment, AKL's explosion is not stronger than other mages That's why I will see AKL6 level will go to gank to pick up heads and get assists Relatively speaking, it is more difficult to develop But it is very good to develop VN is better to develop Just make up for good soldiers I don't have the same desire for human heads as AKL, even if VN doesn't have good equipment, it's awesome to drive big, AKL can't do it, and if you don't have AKL, it's rubbish.
Dawn almost triumphed over fate.
On the close **, the fate of the famous pseudo-long knife, in fact, the knife is short, not to mention, the knife is still very slow. The only thing that can be regarded as a bright spot is that the palm thunder is fast, and then the knife is applied. The dawn knife feels good, and after the skill, there is enough advancement and fist rotation or to grab the opponent's scissors or paper (if it is not necessary to catch people, it is not recommended). >>>More
1. Friendship is always a sweet responsibility, never an opportunity. >>>More
Asian Large. Comparison of the area of the seven continents (approximately): >>>More